the Judge Amano has no jurisdiction and she is not even part of a government know that they are 1) identity thieves and 2) Cleveland Gave Hawaii Back to Queen Liliuokalani .....know they are a non-government because they cannot maintain an imposter position as we speak... the following post is reason why everything should be shut down:
At first my thought was Naiwi! Oh no! But as with most things, knowledge came back to me after "sleeping on it". In August during the "pre". Contested Case Hearings for Mauna Kea, Mr. Wurdeman told the judge a couple of dates in October and a couple in November where he had prior commitments. One was personal in November but the 3 days in October were Supreme Court cases in Honolulu, judge Amano said put it in a document and put it in the online library so that I can see it. Mr, Wurdeman did just that filing his document of "Issues of dates not available in October and November. October 3rd we find ourselves listening to the proposed schedule of hearing dates, who was doing the proposed schedule? UH lawyer, of course he is! He had it all laid out giving everyone 24 hours for filing written responses. There were objections to this schedule that is easy for the corporate side to do with a team of lawyers but not too easy for those representing themselves (pro se)! Mr. Wurdeman objected noting the time it would take to prepare responses and adding his requests for dates he was unavailable. Judge Amano called a ten minute recess.
When we came back in session, the judge announced the schedule... exact same schedule proposed by UH! More discussion and objections about not having enough time to prepare responses to witness testimony with the 24-48 hour turnover. Mr. Wurdeman restated the dates he was unavailable and why, the judge told him to submit the name of the Judge and the Supreme Court Hearing number and she would talk to that judge. Hmmm sounded OK ... maybe. And the judge was not changing her mind about UH Schedule EXCEPT for two weeks of November 14 through 28th when SHE would not be available... Oh OK.
Mr. Wurdeman again requested his four days. Her response a strick NO. Naiwi stated it is common practice to set dates with consideration for other existing court dates. Now I am not a court expert but I have seen that a lot; court people comparing dates for a mutual open date. Amano says No it is not! The judge sets the dates. Naiwi asks if she will call the Supreme Court judge soon then she responds the only thing I will be doing is sending him a written statement of when you are appearing at this hearing!
Having been at every hearing so far and witnessed the prejudice against those who are standing for Mauna Kea and in favor of Corporate interests, I have to agree with the statement of Stephanie Tabbata : "Maybe we are in the wrong place. Maybe this contested hearing is only for corporations. People without heart!"
No comments:
Post a Comment