Saturday, November 19, 2016

More Reasons Why the entity/the Identity Thieves State of Hawaii is Not a Legitimate State

More supporting evidence for Williamson Chang Kili Kekumano, Tane Inciong et. als.: Why Hawai’i is Not a Legitimate State: What the Birthers Missed
Posted on June 13, 2011 by The Global Realm
Why Hawai’i is Not a Legitimate State: What the Birthers Missed By THOMAS NAYLOR CounterPunch.org June 10 – 12, 2011 In the brouhaha over whether President Barack Obama was born in Hawaii or not, few seem to realize, that in the eyes of many historians and legal scholars, Hawaii is not a legitimate state of the United States of America. If the government of Hawaii had not been illegally overthrown in 1893 by the U.S. Marines through a classic act of Manifest Destiny and American-style gunboat diplomacy, Hawaii would still be an independent, sovereign nation today. Notwithstanding a series of clever illegal moves by the U.S. government, Hawaii cannot be considered a legally bona fide state of the United States. In 1898 the United States unilaterally abrogated all of Hawaii’s existing treaties and purported to annex it on the basis of a Congressional resolution. Two years later the U.S. illegally established the so-called Territory of Hawaii on the basis of the spurious Organic Act. After a period of prolonged belligerent occupation by the U.S., Hawaii was placed under United Nations Charter, Article 73, as a “non-self-governing territory” under the administrative authority of the United States. Then in 1959 the U.S. falsely informed the U.N. that Hawaii had become the 50th state of the United States after an illegal plebiscite. Among those allowed to vote in this invalid election were members of the U.S. military and their dependents stationed in Hawaii. In other words, Hawaii’s occupiers were permitted to vote on its future. In November 1993, President Bill Clinton signed Public Law 103-150 apologizing to the 140,000 Native Hawaiians, who call themselves Kanaka Maoli, for the January 17, 1893, invasion of Hawaii deposing Queen Liliuokalani which led to Hawaii’s illegal annexation by the United States and eventually to statehood in 1959. This apology implicitly recognized the unrelinquished inherent sovereignty and right of self-determination of the Native Hawaiian people. Whether it was his intention or not, President Bill Clinton clearly raised the expectations of the Kanaka Maoli that one day Hawaii might once again be viewed as an independent nation-state. The downtrodden Kanaka Maoli, who make up less than 12 percent of Hawaii’s population, “die younger, earn less, go to jail more frequently, and are more likely to be homeless than any other ethnic group in the islands,” according to the Honolulu Weekly. If Barack Obama were born in Hawaii, and his birth certificate says that he was, then why has he shown so little interest in the plight of Native Hawaiians? Bill Clinton has done a lot more for the Kanaka Maoli than Barack Obama, even though Obama pretends to be a compassionate liberal. At one level, it matters not whether President Obama was born in Hawaii, Kenya, Indonesia, or Saudi Arabia. The real issue is how does he behave. Therein lies the rub. Not unlike his friend Donald Trump, Obama has a very strong predisposition towards violence and war, caters almost exclusively to the rich and powerful, and palls around with the right wing government of Israel. Hawaii became an alleged state of the United States as a result of a foreign policy based on full spectrum dominance and imperial overstretch – the same foreign policy employed by Obama over a century later in places like Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Pakistan, and Palestine. President Obama’s benign neglect of the Hawaiian victims of American nineteenth century imperialism says more about who he is than the name of the country on his birth certificate. Thomas H. Naylor is Founder of the Second Vermont Republic and Professor Emeritus of Economics at Duke University. His books include: Downsizing the U.S.A., Affluenza, The Search for Meaning and The Abandoned Generation: Rethinking Higher Education http://www.counterpunch.org/naylor06102011.html
July 5, 2011 public post:
To Everyone,
The entity State of Hawaii FAILS to Protect the Lives, Safety of all of their own citizens, and all visitors, foreigners, including all Hawaiian Nationals, Hawaiian subjects, sovereigns, Hawaiian Royal families due to the depleted uranium, toxins, experimentation, GMO’s, etc., which is why the Hawaiian Kingdom/Ko Hawaii Pae Aina did return.
As a Royal family member, one of the owners of the Crown Lands, Halawa Ahupuaa, etc., I hereby maintain opposition to the Governor Abercrombie, et. als. in all of their acts, deeds against our Sovereigns, Royal families, subjects/citizens, foreign citizens, etc.
This is a public record posted by Amelia Gora, Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, Royal Families House of Nobles, one of the land owners of Washington Place, the land which the entity State Capitol sits on, the Palace Grounds/the Iolani/Iolani Palace, Halawa Ahupuaa, etc.
I further maintain that our ancestors continued Opposition against the U.S./Americans who did premeditate the criminal dethronement of Hawaii’s Queen in 1893.
Sincerely,
Amelia Gora
copies to interested othersJune 6, 2011 Additional Facts added to the records which continues to affect all in the Hawaiian Islands/Hawaiian archipelago/Ko Hawaii Pae Aina/Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii, Hawaii, the United States and the World in the past, present and future: 1840 - “In 1840 new laws came into operation relative to property in land, taxation, and other important subjects. Restrictions on the fisheries were removed, and a new plan of taxation adopted. These measures are calculated to encourage industry by more completely securing the rights of property and labour.” “The welfare of the Sandwich Islanders now depends upon their progress in industry and the useful arts, and in general intelligence. Their political independence is guaranteed; they are masters of their native land; and cannot be exterminated or trampled upon as if they were defenceless barbarians….” Reference: THE PENNY MAGAZINE, June 11, 1842, purchased from the United States. Family Collection. 1848 - King Kamehameha III had separated his private lands from those of the government to safeguard them from Western takeover. In debate in the Privy Council, June 6, 1848, G.P. Judd had stated that it was necessary for the King to divide his private lands from the lands of the government because, “If no explanation of this kind is made, it will mix matters later on, and some of the foreigners will come later on and say they have an interest in the lands too.” Reference: California Law Review, Vol. 63:848, Neil M. Levy – Professor Levy traces the historical displacement of Native Hawaiians from their land and explores the problems of preserving the landholdings and cultural heritage of the Native Hawaiian Community. He suggests that the problems require legislative solutions similar to those afforded to Native Americans and Alaskan Natives. September 16, 1884: 80,000 American Citizens Held In Bondage – How Slaves are Obtained Throughout the World and Sold in the Sandwich Islands: “Mr. Benedick and twenty-nine others were “consigned” to Bishop & Jones plantation, which is known as the “Missionary Plantation.” “This is owned by the Rev. Mr. Bishop and the Rev. M. Jones, two Methodist ministers, well known in the Islands. These men went out there as poor missionaries a few years ago, but are now enormously wealthy. Rev. Mr. Bishop is the leading banker of Honolulu, and employes a dozen clerks in his banking house alone, while the Rev. M. Jones still preaches the Gospel all over the Islands. “When Mr. Benedick and his twenty-nine associates arrived at the plantation, they were conducted to a large building where between 200 and 300 men, women, and small children were congregated, and informed that these would be their quarters. There was but one room in the building, which was entirel open, so that a person standing in any part of the building could take in the whole room at a glance, and all —men, women, and cildren—slept together, without bedding or covering of any kind. If they preferred they would sleep out in the open “corral” or stockade around the house. The climate being very mild, this can be doen with unpuity; still many would have referred to have clothes to wear, but these were difficult to obtain, and enormously expensive, as the labors are allowed only twenty-five cents for each full day s work, while dues for the most trivial offenses, and dock-ages under various pretenses, are so outrageously enormous and frequent that all the laborers are kept heavily in debt, and unable to pay up, even by working unremittingly for years.” Note: The people were kept naked. Contrary to most of the writings, this news article shows that the missionaries who leased lands from the Hawaiian Kingdom were breaking laws of the Hawaiian Kingdom during this period, because laws banning slavery was passed 13 years before the U.S. passed theirs shortly after the American Civil War ended in 1865. The Hawaiian Laws were passed in 1852. The slave vessels were anchored off island, and the people were transported at sea to their plantation destinations….Wicked. Reference: THE PACIFIC COMMERCIAL ADVERTISER, SEPTEMBER 16, 1884 November 4, 1884: Varigny’s article appeared in the PACIFIC COMMERCIAL ADVERTISER. A coup d’tat occurred in 1864 – Kamehameha V’s period, which extinguished the 1852 Constitution. King William Lunalilo was proclaimed “King of the Hawaiian Archipelago” The U.S. saw it as a push for Annexation when Lunalilo moved to re-establish the 1852 Constitution. The United States were set to “establishing an entrepot and a naval station at the mouth of Pearl river, distant about ten miles from Honolulu. The United States were to be free to construct the necessary buildings and dockyards and to place them in charge of a director. The lands conceded were to become American National property, ruled by the United States, who were to possess all sovereign rights within their limits, without any intervention on the part of the local Government. On the other hand, the American Government were to concede free admission, subject to no duties, of the products of the soil and the industry of the Hawaiian Islands into the territory of the Union.” The American businessmen “understood that from the day on which the United States should officially set foot on the Islands the absorption of the rest of the Kingdom would be only a question of time.” Annexation was attempted in 1853; 1872; 1874; and “Annexation, even by indirect ways, is therefore once more indefinitely adjourned.” Reference: THE PACIFIC COMMERCIAL ADVERTISER, NOVEMBER ,1984. 1887 – “With no legal method of overriding the monarch, there seemed no hope in initiating desirable reforms by legislative methods…” Note: Royal persons are not subject to the laws and is documented in the Probate of Victoria Kamamalu, Kahn Collection, etc., Archives, Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaiian Islands. Reference: THE UNITED STATES AND THE HAWAIIAN KINGDOM – A Political History by Merze Tate (1965) Yale University 1895 - “In a communication addressed to the WASHINGTON EVENING STAR, February 12, Colonel Palmer defines as follows the status of the ex-queen as regards the government of Hawaii: “Do I mean that the queen of Hawaii has never given a legal abdication, that she is still the lawful ruler, even if she forbears to enforce her legitimate rights? I do mean exactly that. On January 7, 1895, she was arrested for no specific charged offense, taken by force, and confined alone in the Iolani palace. … She was told that those she dearly loved, personal friends, were awaiting execution, and the only act which would save their lives was an act of abdication to be signed by her. * * * To save those she loved, she executed the document you publish. It was an act consummated under the plainest kind of duress, void even had it been legally executed.” “But the signature is worthless. * * * It is not the official signature. There was no such person recognized as Liliuokalani Dominis, and there is no such person to this day. * * * No question is ever settled until it is settled right; and that the whole Hawaiian matter should be properly reviewed is the opinion of a great many of the people of the United States.” REFERENCE: AFFAIRS IN ASIA, 1st Qr., 1897, articles purchased from Greece. Note: Shortly after the purchase, and posting on the internet, there was a huge fire that ravaged the part of Greece where the article was from, and currently there are ongoing issues in Greece as this Opposition letter is being prepared. Family Collection. 1897 - The parties who dethroned Queen Liliuokalani in 1893 were the same ones who “had conducted the revolution of 1887, and the monarchy was even more helpless in their hands now than at that time, when Cleveland’s own Minister, Merrill, had the naval forces landed “for the protection of American life and property,” just as Stevens did in 1893. Note: These were documented treasonous persons/Pirates. The plans were actually Premeditated and orders were given to take over the Hawaiian Islands by Congress, the U.S. President Benjamin Harrison who had Premeditated the criminal assumption of a neutral, friendly, non-violent, Monarchy based government. See Premeditation documents at this link, last paragraph:
****************************** *********** Premeditation to Assume Pearl Harbor Coaling Station/the Hawaiian Islands – a Standing Order by Congress Eight (8) days BEFORE DETHRONING QUEEN LILIUOKALANI in 1893: Page 1: https://docs.google.com/leaf? id= 0B6Gs4av5Se1wZmFmMWE3YjEtNTAwM y0… Page 2: https://docs.google.com/leaf? id= 0B6Gs4av5Se1wN2RlYzdiOWMtNWJkY S0… ****************************** ******
” On January 14th, 1893, she (Queen Liliuokalani) made her notable attempt to destroy that Constitution and replace it with one giving herself nearly absolute power. She made a most strenuous attempt to proclaim her new constitution, and desisted, furious with anger, only after sever hours’ struggle with her nearest advisers, who knew that it would be fatal to her throne.” The foreign community were aroused and “They promptly organized a Provisional Government and abolished the monarchy.” Note: In the last sentence, what really happened was they organized their preplanned, premeditated set up under the “Provisional Government” and recognized the fact that a monarchy was in existence because Queen Liliuokalani did destroy the Constitution and therefore moved the Constitutional Monarchy back to the Monarchy started by Paiea/Kamehameha in 1810. The facts lies in the words of the period. Reference: THE INDEPENDENT, New York, Thursday, January 14, `897, COL. XLIX, No. 2511, purchased from the United States, Family Collection. September 10, 1898 – The Illegal Annexation Ceremony correspondence documented: “…they feel a sympathetic thrill for the kindly people whose place among the nations is soon to become vacant.” About the Hawaiians/kanaka maoli, “They are kindly, peaceable people, teachable and law abiding.” Note: The Hawaiians/kanaka maoli alone were law abiding for Pirates, criminal racketeers, frauds, genocide activists, deceptive, Mafia types who helped to plan the dethronement of Queen Liliuokalani from a neutral, non-violent, friendly nation Opposed the moves to annex the Hawaiian Islands and supported by her 40,000 subjects/citizens versus the 1500 Americans and their paid off supporters. See:
************************ Annexation Opposition by Queen Liliuokalani found by researcher Kiliwehi Kekumano: https://docs.google.com/leaf? id= 0B6Gs4av5Se1wOGJmZjg4MmQtNWRjM S0… Annexation Opposition (page 2) https://docs.google.com/leaf? id= 0B6Gs4av5Se1wNWVlMTc0MjEtZWZiZ S0… Annexation Opposition (page 3) https://docs.google.com/leaf? id= 0B6Gs4av5Se1wY2RjYzZmNjQtMjUxY i0… Annexation Opposition (page 4) https://docs.google.com/leaf? id= 0B6Gs4av5Se1wNmY2Mzk3ZTctZDEyM y0… ***************************
http://libweb.hawaii.edu/digicoll/annexation/petition.html
Kue: The Hui Aloha Aina Anti-Annexation Petitions, 1897-1898
at

No comments:

Post a Comment