Thursday, December 14, 2017

Vol VI No. 681 Part A - Updated article: American Civil War Losers and their Effects on Society Today or Historical and Inbred Anger Influencing Southern U.S. Presidents and Hawaii Since American Civil War Losers and their Effects on Society Today

American Civil War Losers and their Effects on Society Today or Historical and Inbred Anger Influencing Southern U.S. Presidents and Hawaii Since
                                        American Civil War Losers and their Effects on Society Today

                                                                                or

                                     Historical and Inbred Anger Influencing Southern U.S.
                                             Presidents and Hawaii Since 1863


                                                                                  Review by Amelia Gora (2017)


Have you noticed how the Southerner's attitude plays a role in Society today and the moves to Plunder Upon Innocents in the U.S., Hawaii, and Abroad?

The following excerpts about the Northern and Southern perspectives from a book REFLECTIONS AND COMMENTS written by Edwin Lawrence Godkin (1877) under the Chapter:  The South After the War, brought on curiosities leading to the idea that war losers in this case the American Civil War has been influential in Southern born U.S. Presidents attitudes when interacting with "People of Color":

Godkin wrote:  "as one Southerner expressed it to me on my mentioning the change, "Yes, sir, we have been brought into intellectual and moral relations with the rest of the civilized world." All subjects are now open at the South in conversation.

Is this true? it will probably be asked, with regard to the late war. Can you talk freely about that? Not exactly; but then the limitations on your discourse on this point are not peculiar to the South; they are such as would be put upon the discourse of two parties to a bloody contest in any civilized country among well-bred men or women. The events of the war you can discuss freely, but you are hardly at liberty to denounce Southern soldiers or officers, or accuse them of "rebellion," or to assume that they fought for base or wicked motives. Moreover, in a certain sense, all Southerners are still "unrepentant rebels." Doubtless, in view of the result, they will acknowledge that the war was a gigantic mistake; but I found that if I sought for an admission that, if it was all to do over again, they would not fight, I was touching on a very tender point, and I was gently but firmly repelled. The reason is plain enough.

In confessing this, they would, they think, be confessing that their sons and brothers and fathers had perished miserably in a causeless struggle on which they ought never to have entered, and this, of course, would look like a slur on their memory, and their memory is still, after the lapse of twelve years, very sacred and very dear.

I doubt if many people at the North have an adequate notion of the intensity of the emotions with which Southerners look back on the war; and I mean tender and not revengeful or malignant emotions. The losses of the battle-field were deeply felt at the North—in many households down to the very roots of life; but on the whole they fell on a large and prosperous population, on a community which in the very thick of the fray seemed to be rolling up wealth, which revelled as it fought, and came out of the battle triumphant, exultant, and powerful.

At the South they swept through a scanty population with the most searching destructiveness, and when all was over they had to be wept over in ruined homes and in the midst of a society which was wrecked from top to bottom, and in which all relatives and friends had sunk together to common perdition. There has been no other such cataclysm in history.

Great states have been conquered before now, but conquest did not mean a sudden and desolating social revolution; so that to a Southerner the loss of relatives on the battle-field or in the hospital is associated with the loss of everything else.

A gentleman told me of his going, at the close of the war, into a little church in South Carolina on Sunday, and finding it filled with women, who were all in black, and who cried during the singing. It reminded one of the scene in the cathedral at Leyden, when the people got together to chant a Te Deum on hearing that the besieging army was gone; but, the music suddenly dying out, the air was filled with the sounds of sobbing.

The Leydeners, however, were weak and half-starved people, weeping over a great deliverance; these South Carolinians were weeping before endless bereavement and hopeless poverty. I doubt much if any community in the modern world was ever so ruthlessly brought face to face with what is sternest and hardest in human life; and those of them who have looked at it without flinching have something which any of us may envy them.

But then I think it would be a mistake to suppose that Southerners came out of the war simply sorrowful. At the close, and for some time afterward, they undoubtedly felt fiercely and bitterly, and hated while they wept; and this was the primal difficulty of reconstruction. Frequently in conversation I heard some violent speech or act occurring soon after the war mentioned with the parenthetical explanation, "You know, I felt very bitterly at that time." But, then, I have always heard it from persons who are to day good-tempered, conciliatory, and hopeful, and desirous of cultivating good relations with Northerners; from which the inference, which so many Northern politicians find it so hard to swallow, is easy—viz., that time produces on Southerners its usual effects.

What Mr. Boutwell and Mr. Blaine would have us believe is that Southerners are a peculiar breed of men, on whom time produces no effect whatever, and who feel about things that happened twenty years ago just as they feel about things which happened a month ago.


The fact is, however, that they are in this respect like the rest of the human race. Time has done for their hearts and heads what it has done for the old Virginia battle-fields. There was not in 1865 a fence standing between the Potomac and Gordonsville, and but few, if any, undamaged houses. When I passed Manassas Junction the other day there was a hospitable-looking tavern and several houses at the station; the flowers were blooming in the yard, and crowds of young men and women in their Sunday clothes were gathered from the country around to see a base-ball match, and a well-tilled and well-fenced and smiling farming country stretched before my eyes in every direction. The only trace of the old fights was a rude graveyard filled, as a large sign informed us, with "the Confederate dead." All the rest of the way down to the springs the road ran through farms which looked as prosperous and peaceful as if the tide of war had not rolled over them inside a hundred years, and it is impossible to talk with the farmers ten minutes without seeing how thoroughly human and Anglo-Saxon they are.

With them the war is history—tender, touching, and heroic history if you will, but having no sort of connection with the practical life of to-day. Some of us at the North think their minds are occupied with schemes for the assassination and spoliation of negroes, and for a "new rebellion." Their minds are really occupied with making money, and the farms show it, and their designs on the negro are confined to getting him to work for low wages. His wages are low—forty cents a day and rations, which cost ten cents—but he is content with it. I saw negroes seeking employment at this rate, and glad to get it; and in the making of the bargain nothing could be more commercial, apparently, than the relations of the parties. They were evidently laborer and employer to each other, and nothing more."

Reference:
http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/7257/pg7257-images.html


Highlighted Information or the Dynamics of Southern Attitudes

"Southerners are a peculiar breed of men, on whom time produces no effect whatever, and who feel about things that happened twenty years ago just as they feel about things which happened a month ago."

"Some of us at the North think their minds are occupied with schemes for the assassination and spoliation of negroes, and for a "new rebellion." Their minds are really occupied with making money, and the farms show it, and their designs on the negro are confined to getting him to work for low wages."

"They were evidently laborer and employer to each other, and nothing more."


Add the Southern States:

"Eleven states left the United States in the following order and formed the Confederate States of America: South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Texas, Virginia, Arkansas, North Carolina, and Tennessee."


Add the U.S. Presidents Since 1861 (Confederate States of America formed) through 2017:

Name of President                                              State Born In

15. James Buchanan                                              Pennsylvania
16. Abraham Lincoln                                            Kentucky
17. Andrew Johnson                                             North Carolina                      Confederate State
18. Ulysses S. Grant                                              Ohio
19. Rutherford B. Hayes                                        Ohio
20. James Garfield                                                 Ohio
21. Chester A. Arthur                                            Vermont
22. Grover Cleveland                                             New Jersey
23. Benjamin Harrison                                           Ohio
24. Grover Cleveland                                             New Jersey
25. William McKinley                                            Ohio                          20th Century
26. Theodore Roosevelt                                          New York - banking influence
27. William Howard Taft                                        Ohio
28. Woodrow Wilson                                              Virginia                              Confederate State
29. Warren G. Harding                                            Ohio
30. Calvin Coolidge                                                 Vermont
31. Herbert Hoover                                                   Iowa
32. Franklin D. Roosevelt                                         New York - banking influence
33. Harry S. Truman                                                 Missouri
34. Dwight D. Eisenhower                                       Texas                                  Confederate State
35. John F. Kennedy                                                 Massachusetts
36. Lyndon B. Johnson                                             Texas                                  Confederate State
37. Richard M. Nixon                                               California
38. Gerald R. Ford                                                    Nebraska
39. James Carter                                                       Georgia                               Confederate State
40. Ronald Reagan                                                    Illinois              
41. George H. W. Bush                                             Massachusetts-lived in Texas Confederate State
42. William J. Clinton                                               Arkansas                             Confederate State
21st Century
43. George W. Bush                                                  Connecticut -lived in Texas  Confederate State
44. Barack Obama                                                     Kenya or Kingdom of Hawaii
45. Donald J. Trump                                                 New York

References:  
https://www.whitehouse.gov/1600/Presidents
bing.com
other researches by Amelia Gora


Hawaii/Kingdom of Hawaii/Hawaiian Kingdom/Hawaiian archipelago 

Pirates

Charles Reed Bishop                                  Born In:  New York - banking influence
William Little Lee                                      Born In:  New York - banking influence

Governors Appointed by the U.S. President

Sanford B. Dole                                           Born In:  Hawaii/Kingdom of Hawaii  Status:  Usurper
George R. Carter                                          Born In:  Hawaii/Kingdom of Hawaii  Status:  Usurper
Walter F. Frear                                             Born In:  California
Lucius E. Pinkham                                       Born In:  Massachusetts
Charles J. McCarthy                                     Born In:  Massachusetts
Wallace R. Farrington                                  Born In:  Maine
Lawrence M. Judd                                        Born In:  Hawaii/Kingdom of Hawaii  Status:  Usurper
Joseph Poindexter                                         Born In:  Oregon
Ingram Stainback                                          Born In:  Tennessee                  Confederate State
Oren E. Long                                                Born In:  Kansas
Samuel Wilder King                                     Born In:  Hawaii/Kingdom of Hawaii  Status:  Usurper
William F. Quinn                                          Born In:  New York
Elected by the People                                  
William F. Quinn                                          Born In:  New York
John A. Burns                                             Born In:  Montana
George Ariyoshi                                          Born In:  Hawaii/Kingdom of Hawaii
John D. Waihee III                                     Born In:  Hawaii/Kingdom of Hawaii

Ben Cayetano                                              Born In:  Hawaii/Kingdom of Hawaii
Linda Lingle                                                Born In:  Missouri
Neil Abercrombie                                       Born In:  New York
David Ige                                                     Born In:  Hawaii/Kingdom of Hawaii


Note:  U.S. President Cleveland Gave Hawaii Back to Queen Liliuokalani Twice: In 1894 and 1897
See:  http://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/2017/11/overview-of-us-president-cleveland-gave.html

U.S. President McKinley had the Army, Navy, and Federal personnel "develop" the Territory.
U.S. President McKinley "Proclaimed" Hawaii to be a Territory of the U.S.

In 1912, the Territory's Attorney General documented that 'the Territory is the successor of the Kingdom of Hawaii'.

See:  Updating the ILLEGAL U.S. Documented in Hawaii -A Review- by Amelia Gora (2016)

SUMMARY

Hawaii became infiltrated with People of Color haters.

Kamehameha III passed the anti-slavery law in 1852.

The U.S. passed their anti-slavery law in 1865 or 13 years later.

There were only a few word changes.

The philosophies of the Confederate States were taken on by those arriving in Hawaii.

It was the sugar planters of Hawaii who moved over to the Mexican's territory, then had the U.S. assist in claiming lands of the Mexicans.

The territory was renamed Texas and they were part of the Confederate States who fought the Union Army.

The attitudes taken on in the Hawaiian Islands and the U.S.:

"Southerners are a peculiar breed of men, on whom time produces no effect whatever, and who feel about things that happened twenty years ago just as they feel about things which happened a month ago."


"Some of us at the North think their minds are occupied with schemes for the assassination and spoliation of negroes, and for a "new rebellion." Their minds are really occupied with making money, and the farms show it, and their designs on the negro are confined to getting him to work for low wages."



"They were evidently laborer and employer to each other, and nothing more."

Several Examples are shown below of some of the U.S. Presidents with animosities towards People of Color:

http://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/2017/12/us-presidents-unresolved-issuesand.html
U.S. Presidents Unresolved Issues....and Remembering the HORRORS by Some.... Part 1 of 2

http://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/2017/12/us-presidents-unresolved-issuesand_13.html
U.S. Presidents Unresolved Issues.............and Remembering the HORRORS... Part 2 of 2



Updated:  ILLEGAL U.S. Documented in Hawaii  - A Review- 

                                                                                       by Amelia Gora (2016)

HAWAII REPORTS, Volume 11 - IN RE AH HO, et. al. shows on page 665 "In the exercise of the power conferred by the first of these two provisions, the President of the United States, on August 12, 1898, directed by proclamation, that "the civil, judicial and military powers in question shall be exercised by the officers of the Republic of Hawaii, as it existed just prior to the transfer of sovereignty, subject to his power to remove such officers and to fil vacancies," and after reiterating the second of these and other provisions of the Resolution, further directed that, "under these various provisions, the Government of the islands will proceed without interruption." The intention of Congress was to continue the existing government of the islands in operation without interruption, except in so far as it might be inconsistent with the Constitution or treaties of the United States or with the terms of the Resolution. Subject to this limitation only, the judicial power was to continue as it existed just prior to the transfer of sovereignty."
"Article 82 of the Constitution of Hawaii vested the judicial power of the Republic in one Supreme Court and in such inferior Courts as the Legislature might, from time to time, establish; and Article 85 provided: "The Judicial power shall extend to all cases in law and equity, arising under the Constitution and Laws of the Republic, and Treaties; to all cases affecting Public Ministers and Consuls, and to all cases of Admiralty and Maritime Jurisdiction."....
Reference:
HAWAII REPORTS, Volume 11, RH 345.4 H31 v.11 (date of the case is January 1899)
Review: 
1215 - Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli secured our lands through the Magna Carta under English Common law, the oldest binding law.
1791 - Our lands put in perpetuity by Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli, and the United States recognized it.  Reference:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MO6zyAoG-QM
1826 - Biernes, Switzerland maintains info that we are a neutral Kingdom with no standing Army and we are Hawaii Ko Pae Aina.
1840 - First Constitution of Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli.
1848 - Total perpetuity of lands "omau mau" was made by Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli through the Alodio lands conveyed to our people and to aliens, they were conveyed only Fee Simple - 30 years.
The Alodio lands were the highest Alodio patents in the World.  All Titles are preserved in Kingdom of Hawaii laws.
Our commerce is locked in by the gold standard.
1849/1850 - Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli had metes and bounds recognized in the Treaty of the Kingdom of Hawaii and the United States of America.  Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli documented our metes and bounds in this Treaty.
1860 - United States has no laws that affect Hawaii.
1871 - United States Corporation did not want us to be here in 2000.
The bankers made a Secret U.S. Constitution.  See: 




Oct 6, 2015 - Uploaded by Actof1871
Dont own video Educational purposes Trans Pacific Partnership that Congress will sign in two months will give ...
World Bank Whistle blower Karen Hudes joins Gary Franchi in studio to reveal the truth about the secret US ... 

1875 -  Reciprocity Treaty for Pearl Harbor was signed.  The Treaty was to expire in 1894.  The Claim by the U.S. owning Pearl Harbor is a fraud.  The Alodio Titles belongs to the Families of Kamaikui/Grace Kamaikui and Mataio Kekuanaoa.
1883 - Gold Standard, commerce locked in by Kamehameha V.  
Postal Union important.

1892 -  Premeditation to take over the Kingdom of Hawaii is recorded.  See:  http://www.opednews.com/Diary/More-Evidence-on-Pearl-Har-by-Amelia-Gora-110607-440.html  theiolani.blogspot.com  http://myweb.ecomplanet.com/GORA8037  
1893 - Researcher Shane Lee found the Pearl Harbor Coaling Station article revealing Premeditation on the part of the U.S. in the New YorkTimes newspapers dated 1893 - January 9, 1893 posted - he found it in 1997 thereabouts.
Criminal invasion and dethronement of Hawaii's Queen Liliuokalani.  We were invaded by the USS BOSTON with gatling guns, Horitzer cannons.  The U.S. military surrounded her and held her at gunpoint.
Evidence of Genocide against our Hawaiian people posted showing that Tongues of our people were pulled, cut off.  800 subjects were beheaded according to oral history.  See:  http://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/2016/11/genocide-repost-hawaiians-got-their.html
150+ were recorded to have been beheaded by guillotine on the Big Island.  Other articles posted at  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkUxPlwombA

1897 - Queen Liliuokalani took Hawaii back 4 million acres of Kingdom of Hawaii land, documented through the Red Ribbon document.  See references below.
President Cleveland Gave Hawaii Back to Queen Liliuokalani.http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf…
1898 - United States Senate violated our Neutrality.  See:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MO6zyAoG-QM
Joint Resolution does not apply to us.  It is a domestic law of the 48 States - the contiguous states.
1899 - The United States of America became two nations:  (1) United States and (2) American Empire.
Reference:  PEACOCK vs. Republic of Hawaii Case (1899), HAWAII REPORTS, Archives, Main Library, and Supreme Court Law Library, Honolulu, Oahu.
 President McKinley "directed" and "proclaimed" Hawaii to be a Territory
1900 - Organic Act - there's no metes and bounds.
1903 - Sanford B. Dole took away the Hawaiian language - Genocide.
1904 - U.S. President Cleveland Gave Hawaii Back to Queen Liliuokalani before he left office
1912 - PA PELEKANE Case shows Identity Theft.(HAWAII REPORTS)
1915 - Queen Liliuokalani was placed on the throne for one day. (Paradise of thePacific Magazine)
1921 - Hawaiian Homelands illegal.  Kuhio was only a Prince Regent
1933 - "The United States went “Bankrupt” in 1933 and was declared so by President Roosevelt by Executive Orders 6073, 6102, 6111 and Executive Order 6260 [See: Senate Report 93-549, pgs 187 & 594 under the “Trading With the Enemy Act” {Sixty-Fifth congress, Sess. I, chs. 105,106, October 6, 1917}, and as codified at 12 U.S.C.A. 95a}. The several States of the Union then pledged the faith and credit thereof to the aid of the National Government, and formed numerous socialist committees, such as the “Council of State Governments”, “Social Security Administration” etc., to purportedly deal with the economic “Emergency”. These Organizations operated under the “Declaration of INTERdependence” of January 22, 1937, and published some of their activities in “The Book Of The States.” The 1937 Edition of The Book Of The States openly declared that the people engaged in such activities as the Farming/Husbandry Industry had been reduced to mere feudal “Tenants” on their Land [Book Of The States, 1937, pg. 155]."  Reference:  http://myweb.ecomplanet.com/GORA8037/ article by John Nelson, Legal Researcher.
1939 - Army Navy and Federal officials developed the Territory - celebration of 40 years newspaper
1988 - President Reagan's era, it was found that there is no treaty that holds the Kingdom of Hawaii to the United States....they are making the Archipelago as a National Park - they have no treaty.  Oct. 4 - they could not find the laws.
There is no treaty of cession, there was no war.  Queen Liliuokalani acquiesced.  
Researcher Kilikina Kekumano  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2dfm7MeXfM
1997 - Governor Cayetano began to sell Magnesium to China by allowing them to mine our minerals.
1998 - Williamson Chang began his legal research on the Joint Resolution, etc.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkUxPlwombA  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZWO0you8JM
2001 -  Kilikina Kekumano began her research in Maryland.
2010+ - Williamson Chang Reveals the Illegal Joint Resolution of July 7, 1898.  See:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZWO0you8JM    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkUxPlwombA
Kilikina Kekumano found Queen Liliuokalani's Opposition to Annexation "red ribbon documents" - it is a lien.  She maintains that we are Hawaii Ko Pae Aina.
2015 - Misprison of Treason/Treason committed by Nai Aupuni/Na'i Aupuni, et. als. -  Kilikina Kekumano.
Nai Aupuni /Na'i Aupuni is there to steal Everything that you have, committing a crime, Misprison of Felony, Treason/Misprison of Treason, Genocide,   Misprison of Felony is committed by the Department of Interior.  See:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MO6zyAoG-QM
2016 http://amelia-gora.blogspot.com/ update - Rents sent to the State, Federal....Rents becomes Land Lord Liens, etc.
Nai Aupuni/Na'i Aupuni, the Military et. als. are Not our Friends.
Summary
President McKinley "directed" and "proclaimed" Hawaii to be a Territory. Too late though because President Cleveland Gave Hawaii back to Queen Liliuokalani years earlier.
Identity Theft documented in the 1912 Pa Pelekane Case.
Research proves that the U.S. is illegal in the Kingdom of Hawaii.
aloha.
more references:
p.s. The identity thieves/imposter government or the non-government sued some of us in Court, over the Crown Lands, which really belongs to Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli, 'himself, his heirs and successors forever, exclusively' not the developed Territory which turned into a State through Executive Order of U.S. President Eisenhower with documented opposition by one of Kamehameha's descendants, heirs, and successors named Harold Abel Cathcart, first cousin of some of our great grandmother Mele Kauweloa.
Evidence found recently shows that U.S. President Cleveland Gave Hawaii Back to Queen Liliuokalani. See: President Cleveland Gave Hawaii Back to Queen Liliuokalani https://docs.google.com/leaf? id= 0B6Gs4av5Se1wN2JkZjMxMzEtMDIyN i0...
Opposition to Annexation was documented. See: Opposition to Annexation - page 1 (researcher Kiliwehi Kekumano found the true Opposition in Maryland) https://docs.google.com/leaf… to Annexation Page 2 https://docs.google.com/leaf…... Opposition to Annexation page 3 https://docs.google.com/leaf… to Annexation - page 4 https://docs.google.com/leaf….
Joint Resolution is Not a Treaty. Annexation by the U.S. was illegal. U.S. is an Occupier, an Illegal Occupier See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2dfm7MeXfM and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjELyim8q80
U.S. President Cleveland left office in 1897 and U.S. President William McKinley became President. McKinley was shot and died from gangrene after the Army, Navy, and Federal personnel "developed the territory".
Identity theft was identified in the PA PELEKANE case of 1912. Reference: HAWAIIAN REPORTS, 1912, Archives/Main Library/Supreme Court Law Library, Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaii.
Other references and other information:
Premeditation to take over Pearl Harbor - Page 1 (found by researcher Shane Lee) https://docs.google.com/leaf…... Premeditation to take over Pearl Harbor - page 2 https://docs.google.com/leaf…... Opposition to Annexation - page 1 (researcher Kiliwehi Kekumano found the true Opposition in Maryland) https://docs.google.com/leaf… to Annexation Page 2 https://docs.google.com/leaf…... Opposition to Annexation page 3 https://docs.google.com/leaf… to Annexation - page 4 https://docs.google.com/leaf…...
SAYS GOVERNMENT SUPPORTS TRUSTS; Mr. Hitchcock Condemns System of Army and Navy Contracts. ARMOR PLATE AS EXAMPLE Beef Trust, Shipbuilding Trust, and Railroads Cited -- Bates Calls Cleveland a Receptive Candidate.
WASHINGTON, Feb. 20. -- That the Federal Government, which is supposed to be after the trusts, is making large contracts with them and paying them the people's money, was charged by Representative Hitchcock (Dem., Neb.) in the course of a vigorous criticism of the army and navy expenditures in the H...
query.nytimes.com
Articles on Hawaii and the American Civil War





















The Civil War and Hawaii

Disunion
Disunion follows the Civil War as it unfolded.
Almost 5,000 miles and half an ocean away from the killing fields of Gettysburg, Chickamauga, or Spotsylvania, Hawaii and Hawaiians might be assumed to have not played a role in the Civil War. Yet regardless of proud protestations of neutrality by the Hawaiian monarchy – the islands were not American territory at the time – many of the islands’ residents participated in the conflict, on both sides. And for good reason: though they lived on one of the most geographically isolated island chains in the world, Hawaiians kept abreast of international events, knowing that the outcome of the war could greatly affect Hawaii as well.
The presidential election of Abraham Lincoln received a positive response in Hawaii, with the Hawaiian-language newspaper Ka Hoku Loa writing that America was “blessed” to have him at such a problematic time. Nevertheless, the Lincoln administration was worried about Hawaiian neutrality and what it saw to be growing British influence in the islands. Understandably preoccupied with more pressing domestic matters, Lincoln and Secretary of State William H. Seward did what they could. Seward replaced the boorish and tactless American commissioner to Hawaii, Thomas Dyer, with the more capable James McBride, and promoted McBride to minister, making him the highest-ranking foreign official in the kingdom.
Later, after the passing of King Kamehameha IV Alexander Liholiho in 1863, Lincoln sent a personal four-page letter to the new monarch, Kamehameha V Lot Kapuāiwa, professing Lincoln’s sorrow, while congratulating the king and extending offers of support from “Your Majesty’s Good Friend.”










Photo
King Kamehameha V
King Kamehameha VCredit Hawaii State Archives
However, the Hawaiian monarchy had its own reasons to improve relations with the United States, as it wanted a new trade treaty. To that end, Kamehameha V sent an emissary, Chief Justice E. H. Allen, to Washington in 1864. In June, Allen met with Lincoln, Seward and other politicians to discuss the prospects for a new treaty. He returned to Hawaii frustrated yet optimistic, without a treaty in hand but reporting that Lincoln and Seward were receptive to the idea. The only problem, Seward told Allen, was that the “civil war renders such negotiation inconvenient and inexpedient.” Still, the secretary of state promised, “at no very distant period … the subject will be resumed with pleasure.” Private correspondence revealed that Seward planned to request a “port, sufficient for a wharf and buildings for a naval depot” in what appeared to be a forebear of Pearl Harbor.
Similar geopolitical wrangling played out in the newspapers. Mid-19th-century newspapers were unabashedly slanted, and the Hawaiian press was no different. Many papers were published in Hawaiian, English or a combination of the two. The Hawaiian-language press was to varying degrees anti-monarchy and quasi-independent, but over all it was pro-Union. The Polynesian was one of the biggest and the self-proclaimed “official organ of the Hawaiian government.” It was a curious combination of abolitionism and states’ rights advocacy that liked to reprint articles from England in favor of neutrality. Engaging in a bit of yellow journalism, The Polynesian used the Civil War as a proxy fight against The Pacific Commercial Advertiser, its main rival and voice of American business interests in Hawaii. For example, in January 1863, The Polynesian claimed that The Pacific Commercial Advertiser had “never approved” of Lincoln’s removal of Gen. George B. McClellan, unlike The Polynesian, and now Lincoln and The Polynesian had been vindicated by Union advances on the battlefield.
Hawaiians themselves decidedly favored the North. Union victories were celebrated, and a Honolulu bookstore sold red, white and blue envelopes that read “Union must be preserved” alongside copies of “Uncle Tom’s Cabin.” Neighbors of a Southern-born woman living in Honolulu ripped up a Confederate flag she had hung from her veranda. In fact, support for Lincoln in Hawaii was greater than in the United States – he did better in 1860 and 1864 mock elections with American expats in Hawaii than among the Northern voting public. American residents on Hawaii island threw a grand Fourth of July celebration in 1861, complete with bands, the firing of guns, and toasts to Lincoln and the Union.
Perhaps too caught up in the revelry, a Hilo merchant named Thomas Spencer organized about 40 Hawaiians into a volunteer auxiliary corps that pledged its support should Lincoln call upon them. The group was later dubbed “Spencer’s Invincibles” and drilled in military tactics. The Pacific Commercial Advertiser reported that “all the company now wants is a chance of a shot at Jeff Davis’ bloodhounds,” and that the men hoped that Hawaii’s proclamation of neutrality “will not spoil the fun.” The Hawaiian government did in fact disband the group, but the monarchy could not stop others from joining the fray.
More than 100 people from Hawaii fought on both sides of the Civil War. Arguably the most famous was the Union general Samuel C. Armstrong. Born on Maui to missionary parents who ran a school for Hawaiian children, after the war Armstrong used that educational experience as the inspiration for his founding and running of the Hampton Institute, which trained African-Americans as teachers and engineers. It was at the Hampton Institute that Booker T. Washington received his education, and he used his alma mater as a model for his Tuskegee Institute.
However, unlike the white Armstrong, native Hawaiians who fought for the Union risked segregation because of their skin color. One volunteer, Prince Romerson, served in the Fifth Massachusetts Volunteer Cavalry, an all-black regiment, and mustered out as a sergeant. Exceptions did occur, though: Henry Hoolulu Pitman, son of the Hawaiian Chiefess Kinoole O Liliha, was a private in the 22nd Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry, a white regiment, who was captured and died in Richmond’s Libby Prison.
A few Hawaiians also found themselves fighting for the South. Probably more for employment than the Southern cause, about 10 Hawaiian seamen joined the crew of the Shenandoah, a Confederate raider that wrought havoc throughout the Pacific. Interestingly, the saga of the Shenandoah played an important part in the larger story of the later overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy. Indiscriminate in sinking both American and Hawaiian whaling vessels, the Shenandoah did not directly cause the demise of the whaling industry in the Pacific, but it did hasten it. With whaling ships becoming scarcer and voyages to find whales longer and more cost-prohibitive, commercial agricultural plantations came into their own in Hawaii. After dabbling in cotton, rice and other products, planters found sugar to be the cash crop of choice. Commercially active in Hawaii since the 1830s, the Hawaiian sugar industry saw one of its greatest expansions during the Civil War era. As a result of the Union boycott of Southern sugar, Hawaiian sugar exports to the United States rose 175 percent a year from 1860 to 1866, while prices jumped over 500 percent.
Related
Disunion Highlights
Fort Sumter
Explore multimedia from the series and navigate through past posts, as well as photos and articles from the Times archive.
However, the rise in sugar profits sowed the seeds for the overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy. Eerily prophetic, The Pacific Commercial Advertiser reported that the Lahina Sugar Company paid more in taxes on sugar than the Hawaiian king’s salary, which caused the paper to speculate, “We don’t advise the Lahina Sugar Company to purchase his sovereignty – that would be treason or treachery, we don’t know exactly which.” Either way, the sugar industry in Hawaii gradually gained political and economic power in the kingdom, eventually instituting a form of contract labor that verged on slavery.
The consolidation of wealth and power generated on these plantations proved fertile ground for white businessmen and their ilk, some of whom were Civil War veterans, who favored American annexation of the islands and ultimately overthrew the kingdom of Hawaii in a coup d’état on Jan. 17, 1893. The war that strengthened the United States as a country laid the foundation for the destruction of the kingdom of Hawaii, and inextricably bound the two for centuries yet to come.
Follow Disunion at twitter.com/NYTcivilwar or join us on Facebook.

Jeffrey Allen Smith is an assistant professor of history at the University of Hawaii, Hilo. Research assistance for this article was provided by Robert Franklin, Scott Hampe and Noah Gomes.

*****************************


PARASITES IN PARADISE: American Civil War Generals In the Hawaiian Islands Documented

PARASITES IN PARADISE


False Flag Operations: American Civil War Generals Operating In the Hawaiian Islands


                                                   researched by Amelia Gora (2017)
The following American Civil War Generals were found in the Hawaiian Islands:
1)  General Marshall
2) General Armstrong/General Samuel Armstrong
Reference:

The Pacific commercial advertiser. (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, January 02, 1892, Image 2

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn85047084/1892-01-02/ed-1/s...

Page 
3)  General  W.H. Dimond

Reference:

The Pacific commercial advertiser. (Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands) 1885-1921, November 15, 1893, Image 5

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn85047084/1893-11-15/ed-1/s...

Page 
4)  Walter Gresham
5)  Alfred Hartwell
6)  Carl Schurz
7)  Robert E. Lee
8)  General Schofield
SUMMARY
The above American Civil War Generals have been uncovered in the Hawaiian Islands. This is evidence of premeditation, conspiracies, piracy etc.
Research incomplete.

Informing many because..............
  
Something STINKS...............(.and I know it's NOT ME) WICKED TO THE MAX!
aloha.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzcv5TJkJBA  Fifteen Men (Bottle of Rum)
References:
 PIRATES OF THE PACIFIC:  Charles Reed Bishop and Friends by Amelia Gora (2001)
http://www.911review.com/articles/anon/false_flag_perations.html

History of 
American False Flag Operations

The leaders of smaller and less industrialised nations are not madmen (whatever the media claims). They also are generally better informed than their citizens. In a war an attacker does not need equal forces compared to the enemy. The attacker needs a 5-fold local superiority, or better. No one begins wars without very definite objectives and a quick victory in sight. If a war with more even military balance erupts, someone has been mislead and walked into a trap (usually arranged by third party).
After the American war of Independence (1776-1779), and an English challenge to that independence (1812-1814) no single nation has planned an offensive war against the USA. It is probable that a strong coalition of Anglo-French-led European nations planned to split the USA into two states through diplomatic recognition of the Confederate states possibly followed up by naval blockade embargoing the Union. At that time the British Empire was the strongest naval power, and the French the second strongest. The events led, however, into the Civil War (1860-1865) and due to the Russian intervention 1863 (1863) on the Union's side, those European plans were quietly abandoned.
Mexican wars 1819, 1846-48: Long series of operations, commencing with the annexion of Florida (1819) and followed by a declaration of independence of Texas from Mexico (1836). Provocative troop movements near the U.S. southern border caused an incident which led to war. (It is said the US built a fortification 150 km inside the Mexican border.) The annexation of Texas by the USA and the conquest of California, New Mexico, and nearby territories followed. Mexico had a weak government at that time, because after Napoleon conquered Spain (1809) their former colonies soon revolted. Mexico had been a colony of the Spanish kingdom but now they revolted and formed a republic. There were a series of revolts, not just one.
Spanish-American war, 1898: The surprise explosion of the battleship Maine at Havana, Cuba. 255 of the crew died. The Hearst press accused the Spanish, claiming that the explosion was caused by a remote-controlled mine. The USA declared war on Spain, and conquered Philippines, Guam and Cuba. Subsequent investigations revealed that the explosion originated inside the Maine and that it was either an accident, such as a coal explosion, or some type of time bomb inside the battleship. Divers investigating the shipwreck found that the armour plates of the ship were blown bending outwards, not inwards.
World War I, 1914-1918: A U-boat torpedo hit ocean liner Lusitania near Britain and some 1200 people, including 128 Americans, on board lost their lives. Subsequent investigations revealed that the major explosions were inside the Lusitania, as it was secretly transporting 6 million pounds of artillery shells and rifle ammunition, as well as other explosives on behalf of Morgan banking corporation to help their clients, the Britain and the France. It was against US laws to transport war materials and passengers in the same ship.
World War 2, 1939-1945: A U-boat torpedo hit the ocean liner Athenia near Britain with some 1100 passengers, of which 311 were Americans. The sea was calm and only 118 people on board lost their lives. The ship was sunk because it behaved like a military transport, blackened out and zigzagging. This incident wasn't enough to precipitate war, and the Germans also refused to be provoked by several American acts of war. Americans confiscated German merchant ships, and Americans started to support the British with various lend-lease items, US volunteer pilots joined the RAF and some RAF pilots were trained in the US, US gave the British 50 old but usable WW1 destroyers and 20 modern torpedo boats, tanks, light bombers, fighter aircraft like P-40s and so on. American destroyers also escorted the convoys bound to Britain, and attacked German U-boats even far away from those convoys. The US did not maintain a neutral stance attitude towards the warring nations.
The US naval intelligence, chief of Japan desk planned and suggested "8 insults", which should bring Japan into war with the US. President Roosevelt executed this plan immediately and also added some other insults, enraging the Japan. The most serious one was a total blockade of Japanese oil imports, as agreed between the Americans, British and the Dutch. FDR also declared an all-out embargo against the Japan and forbade them the use of Panama canal, impeding Japan's access to Venezuelan oil.
The Flying Tigers volunteer air group successfully fighting the Japanese in China with some 90 fairly modern P-40Bs was another effective provocation that is not generally acknowledged by historical accounts of World War 2, most of which fail to mention any air combat action prior to 7th December 1941. But at that time the Japanese had already had lost about 100 military aircraft, mostly bombers, to the Tigers. After Pearl Harbor these squadrons were some of the the hardest-hitting ones in the US service.
The attack on Pearl Harbour followed some 6 months later. Having broken the Japanese encryption codes, the Americans knew what was going to happen, when and where, but the president did not dispatch this information to Pearl Harbor. Americans even gave their friends the British 3 Magic decrypting machines which automatically opened encrypted Japanese military traffic. But this same information was not available to the commanders of Hawaii. The movement of the fleet was also visible in the very effective radio direction finding network. Japan had an alliance with Germany, and the Germans upheld their promises by declaring the war against the USA right after the Japanese declaration.
Two scapegoats, the navy commander Admiral Husband Kimmel, and the army commander Lt. General Walter Short were found incompetent and demoted as they were allowed to retire. Short died 1949 and Kimmel 1958. In 1995, the US Congress re-examined this decision and endorsed it. Then in 2000 some archive information came to light and the US Senate passed a resolution stating that both had served in Hawaii "competently and professionally". In 1941 they were denied vital information, and even on presidential orders purposefully mislead into believing that the Japanese feet could be expected from the southwest. These commanders have yet to be rehabilited by the Pentagon.
Korean War, 1950-1953: South Korean incursions (the Tiger regiment etc.) into North Korea (1949) led to contrary claims and into war. The cause of this war propably was covert action involving leaders of Taiwan, South Korea and the US military-industrial complex (John Foster Dulles has been mentioned as an organizer of the hostilities.) After the unpublished hostilities in 1949, the communist powers were strongly backing North Korea.
Chiang Kai Sek was being abandoned, isolated and falling prey to the powerful communist Chinese operations. The right-wing South Korean ruler was expected to loose the soon-to-be-elections. The American military-industrial complex went into high gear again, and huge government orders for equipment were flowing in.
The American-led UN forces had difficult times early in the war, but after sufficient forces arrived they advanced victoriously and penetrated deep into the North Korea. The strong Chino-Russian intervention into the war once again turned the tides, the Chinese with vast armies on ground, and the Soviets less visibly with large numbers of aircraft, nearly costing the UN forces the war.
Finally the front stabilised along the original 38th parallel armistice line. The war resulted in the death of 3 million Korean Chinese and the destruction of virtually all of the Korean cities, and left Taiwan in strong American protection and South Korea firmly in the hands of the right-wing president Syngman Rhee. Some 55,000 Americans lost their lives.
Vietnam War: "The Tonkin incident", where American destroyer Maddox was supposedly attacked twice by three North Vietnamese torpedo boats in 1964 in the Gulf of Tonkin never happened. What was happening at the time were aggressive South Vietnamese raids against the North in the same general area. Huge American presence wasn't decisive and President Nixon negotiated a "peace with honour" in 1973. This war was lost, when North Vietnam finally conquered South Vietnam in 1975.
Grenada invasion: The Grenadian leader, Maurice Bishop, favouring the left and having invited Cubans to help build the infrastructure including by extending the airport to accomodate long range Soviet aircraft, was deposed and executed in October 19, 1983. Six days later the US invaded, with the proffered reason that the American medical students studying in the Grenada were in danger due the Cuban presence. The new leader supported by the US favoured more traditional values and the right.
War on Drugs: The war was launched by Richard M Nixon sometime around June 17,1971. The drug problem was found bad within the army in Viet Nam around 1968 prompting action was required towards the end of the war. Nowadays it is estimated that the military will never win the War on Drugs. The street prices of illicit drugs did not change significantly in the USA despite the military action in foreign drug-producing countries. The Colombian experience, with local military supported by the US, has shown that peace is more important than war against drugs. The Colombians have successfully negotiated some 1000s of guerrilla fighters back into the society and out of jungle.
This "war" actually seems to be a pretext for military invasions into less developed countries, where covert "bad" drug lords on behalf of western intelligence services are producing drugs into US and first world markets. This operation produces huge incomes, generating black budget money for those intelligence services managing the global drug operations.
Panama invasion: The incident between American and Panamanian troops led to invasion. The leader Noriega was changed and the earlier Carter administration plan to hand control of the canal over to Panama was cancelled. The strategic importance of the canal has surpassed any more just thinking in the US global domination policy.
US-Israeli sponsored war between Iraq and Iran, 1980-1988: The US has built power bases in the Middle East in Iran starting with the CIA-organised coup 1953, where Iranian prime minister Mossadeq was replaced with the Shah of Iran Reza Pahlavi and he by his son Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. Iran was equipped with the best western military equipment, including the American F-14 fighters with Phoenix missiles and the British Chieftain MBTs. Unfortunately there was in 1979 a coup of ayatollah Khomeini replacing the Shah and founding an Islamite nation.
After this, the US warmed up relations with their good Iraqi friend Saddam Hussein, and started to build a nation capable of challenging the Iran. Iraq acquired large numbers of effective weapons including factories able to produce older versions of gas warfare agents. These would later be called WMDs, which of course they were not, being the WW1-vintage weapons.
The war broke out and was fought to exhaustion because third-party powers, especially Israel, were carefully monitoring the power balance supplying more weapons to the side which seemed to be loosing. "Too bad they both cannot loose" is how Kissinger evaluated this situation.
Desert Storm (First Gulf war), 1991): Hussein asked for permission from the US (via their ambassador April Gillespie) and got an answer that the US does not care Arab quarrels. That was a trap, and after Saddam occupied Kuwait, George Bush Sr. mobilised a coalition of some 40 nations to "liberate Kuwait" and to smash the recently-built Iraqi military power base. This also involved a media hoax, where the daughter of Kuwaiti US ambassador played nurse on TV and testified to "witnessing" Iraqi soldiers throwing babies out of incubators in Kuwait.
War on Terror: The war was launched by Bush administration October 2001. The war was claimed to be the response on terrorism, especially the 9-11 incidents. Most of the people in the world today know that these reasons are false and that those events were based on MIH type (make it happen) inside job.
Enduring Freedom (Afghanistan invasion), 7.10.2001-: Without any evidence, the former CIA-asset, a Saudi-Arabian Osama bin Laden was claimed to be the mastermind behind the 9/11 strikes at the WTC and the Pentagon. Such a complex operation, if actually executed which it was not, in this case would be much beyond the capabilities of anything in Afghanistan. Only some top ten intelligence services in the world could hope to be successful in such an operation involving forgery, infiltration, living "underground" in a foreign non-Muslim country, coordination of moves, illegal arms, hi-quality flight training, accurate aircraft navigation in no-visibility conditions and so on. Perhaps even less, because the friends of the US (at that time, still most of the world) would also have been interested in stopping the attack.
Enduring Justice (Second Gulf war), 20.3.2003-: later known with less irony as Operation Iraqi Freedom The claimed reason of the attack was that Iraq was a clear and present danger to the US with wmd's available within less than an hour after the decision to assemble them has been made. Since no wmd's were found, and after the Iraqi also scrapped some 800 long range Scud style missiles before the US coalition attack, the reason for the invasion was changed into "bringing the democracy into Iraq".

Observations and Comments

Confederate States or American Civil War Losers are Problematic,and breeds animosities against People of Color.  Their positions in Society have strong influences affecting innocents.

Warmongering promoted by the Confederate States history influences U.S. Presidents, Judges,et. als. who unknowingly move towards the  influences because of their
ancestral backgrounds in operating large plantations, animosities towards all people of color,
The move to terminate the lives of the 'useless, and needless eaters' promotes the Genocide activities of the One World Order/New World Order objectives.

Although many U.S. Presidents are descendants of England's Royal Families, they are part of the American Government which began because the People created the Government.

The people have the power to change their government.

Unlike the Constitutional Monarchy governments such as Hawaii/Kingdom of Hawaii/ Hawaiian Kingdom, we help in reminding others of the Rule of Law, Treaties are Contractual agreements, and we are Not the ones who did wrong.

Reminders that Genocide activities engaged in to eliminate the masses by Depleted Uranium use, Rat Poison drops, Radiation spread in the Hawaiian archipelago, Contaminating Water via Jet fuel storage in Halawa, etc., Telescope buildings erected for military purposes, including laser use, etc. is Not O.K.

Respect for life is important for all, and the lack of shows in the Confederate approach with destruction intended on innoccents.

This kind of attitude is supported by those who move to Rule the World without law, and expect to survive under God's watchful eyes.

All people needs to be vigilant, maintain peace, and take back your governments with rules of law or operate in a good way aligning with the Union (not Confederate) mentality.

May God help all Innocents who have not done wrong.

Research incomplete.


aloha.





References

Why the Pearl Harbor took place

Robert B. Stinnett: Day of Deceit: the Truth about FDR and Pearl Harbor, 2000
Mark Emerson Wiley: Pearl Harbour - mother of all conspiracies
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/pearl.html

Cordell Hull's Ultimatum to Japan

What the US usually knew in advance (books)

Fredrick W. Winterbotham: The Ultra secret, 1974
Bradley F. Smith: The Ultra-Magic Deals, 1992
F.H.Hinsley: British Intelligence in the WW2 (4 large volumes), 1988

How to create innocent-looking wars

How wars are made

http://tacklingthetoughtopics.net/default.htm
Especially these items: World War 1, World War 2, Korean War, The Vietnam War

How to create distant future wars

The Best Enemy Money Can Buy by Antony C. Sutton
Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution by Antony C. Sutton
Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler by Antony C. Sutton
The out-of-print book: From Major Jordan's Diaries (Google this item)

Overthrow: America's century of regime change from Hawaii to Iraq - Stephen Kinzer

Statue of Saddam Hussein being toppled, Iraq 2003
"Regime change" did not begin with the administration of George W. Bush, but has been an integral part of U.S. foreign policy for more than one hundred years. This book is a chronicle of US intervention since 1893.
Starting with the toppling of the Hawaiian monarchy in 1893, the United States has not hesitated to overthrow governments that stood in the way of its political and economic goals. The invasion of Iraq in 2003 is but the latest example of the dangers inherent in these operations.
In Overthrow, Stephen Kinzer tells the stories of the audacious politicians, spies, military commanders, and business executives who took it upon themselves to depose foreign regimes. He details the three eras of America's regime-change century--the imperial era, which brought Cuba, Puerto Rico, the Philippines, Nicaragua, and Honduras under America's sway; the cold war era, which employed covert action against Iran, Guatemala, South Vietnam, and Chile; and the invasion era, which saw American troops toppling governments in Grenada, Panama, Afghanistan, and Iraq.
AttachmentSize
Overthrow_ America's Century of Regime C - Kinzer, Stephen.epub4.04 MB
Overthrow_ America's Century of Regime C - Kinzer, Stephen.mobi3.45 MB

Posted By

Tyrion
Sep 13 2013 17:31

No comments:

Post a Comment