WHAT CANCER CANNOT DO!
It cannot cripple Love
It cannot shatter Hope
It cannot corrode Faith
It cannot eat away Peace...
It cannot destroy Confidence
It cannot kill Friendship
It cannot shut out Memories
It cannot silence Courage
It cannot reduce Eternal Life
It cannot quench the Spirit
So my warrior husband, VALE MADULI SR. RIPn LOVE till we are together again. Your heartbroken wife, Vanda.
See More
It cannot cripple Love
It cannot shatter Hope
It cannot corrode Faith
It cannot eat away Peace...
It cannot destroy Confidence
It cannot kill Friendship
It cannot shut out Memories
It cannot silence Courage
It cannot reduce Eternal Life
It cannot quench the Spirit
So my warrior husband, VALE MADULI SR. RIPn LOVE till we are together again. Your heartbroken wife, Vanda.
See More
Gwyneth Paltrow’s online magazine goop shares the wisdom of Medical Medium Anthony William on the root cause of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Fibromyalgia, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Hashimoto's and more. A MUST READ!!! http://bit.ly/1iFWKXH
Pikanini Pake commented on your post.
serious to hilarious..............lol
It is most important to note that Hawaii lands were NEVER ceded and the normalized use of the term "ceded" is incorrect and the precedent set in this otherwise ...accurate summary of Mauna Kea and land ownership is FALSE.
It is also MOST IMPORTANT to note that the "overthrow" of Hawaii is and was an UNLAWFUL OVERTHROW being that treaties existed between the U.S. and Ko Hawaii Pae Aina (The Hawaiian Kingdom).
Therefore the term unlawful, as opposed to illegal should ALWAYS proceed overthrow in regards to Hawaii.
To say overthrow without unlawful or with illlegal or with nothing proceeding this term is an enablement of, and collaboration with, the unlawful occupation, the economic genocide of all of Hawaii, and the ethnocide of kanaka and Ko Hawaii (Hawaii's National Subject Body and its descendants) past, present, and (hopefully not, but...) future.
"Illegal" should never proceed the term "overthrow" in regards to Hawaii, once you are made aware. The term "overthrow" should never be used in regards to Hawaii witout being proceeded by "unlawful." In other words to just state "the overthrow of Hawaii" is false, innacurate and wrong. So is "the illegal overthrow."
Why? "For something to be considered ‘illegal’, there has to be a specific law passed by a legislative authority, such as a local or national government that expressly makes it illegal. Something that is ‘unlawful’ is contrary or goes against the established law, without there being a specific law enacted by a legislative authority. So it seems illegal has more to do with internal laws and unlawful has more to do with external legal agreements like treaties.
On a separate note, although I am not a despicable lawyer but act as my own lawyer as Sacred Mauna Kea Hui's founder, I want to clear up some confusion in the case of what is called "common law." These set of mandates and regulations, called "common law," if adopted by a country's legislative entity, would fall under legal and not lawful.
(Source: http://www.differencebetween.net/…/difference-between-ille…/)
"The boundaries of Hawaiʿi as promulgated by Kamehameha III were clear. The 1846 law named the islands and the channel waters as the dominion of the Kingdom. After the overthrow in 1893, the Provisional Government claimed the same dominion as belonged to the Kingdom. Likewise, the Republic of Hawaiʿi in 1894 as successor to the Provisional Government held the same dominion as both the Kingdom and the Provisional Government. the Territory in 1898 could not claim the dominion of its predecessor, the Republic of Hawaiʿi. The Republic had never ceded its dominion to the U.S. Unlike the Provisional Government and the Republic there was no basis by which the U.S. could claim the dominion held by the Republic of Hawaiʿi." (2015, Chang, pdf pp. 34-35 http://blog.hawaii.edu/aplpj/files/…/09/APLPJ_16_2_Chang.pdf)
#OverthrowOHA
See MoreTherefore the term unlawful, as opposed to illegal should ALWAYS proceed overthrow in regards to Hawaii.
To say overthrow without unlawful or with illlegal or with nothing proceeding this term is an enablement of, and collaboration with, the unlawful occupation, the economic genocide of all of Hawaii, and the ethnocide of kanaka and Ko Hawaii (Hawaii's National Subject Body and its descendants) past, present, and (hopefully not, but...) future.
"Illegal" should never proceed the term "overthrow" in regards to Hawaii, once you are made aware. The term "overthrow" should never be used in regards to Hawaii witout being proceeded by "unlawful." In other words to just state "the overthrow of Hawaii" is false, innacurate and wrong. So is "the illegal overthrow."
Why? "For something to be considered ‘illegal’, there has to be a specific law passed by a legislative authority, such as a local or national government that expressly makes it illegal. Something that is ‘unlawful’ is contrary or goes against the established law, without there being a specific law enacted by a legislative authority. So it seems illegal has more to do with internal laws and unlawful has more to do with external legal agreements like treaties.
On a separate note, although I am not a despicable lawyer but act as my own lawyer as Sacred Mauna Kea Hui's founder, I want to clear up some confusion in the case of what is called "common law." These set of mandates and regulations, called "common law," if adopted by a country's legislative entity, would fall under legal and not lawful.
(Source: http://www.differencebetween.net/…/difference-between-ille…/)
"The boundaries of Hawaiʿi as promulgated by Kamehameha III were clear. The 1846 law named the islands and the channel waters as the dominion of the Kingdom. After the overthrow in 1893, the Provisional Government claimed the same dominion as belonged to the Kingdom. Likewise, the Republic of Hawaiʿi in 1894 as successor to the Provisional Government held the same dominion as both the Kingdom and the Provisional Government. the Territory in 1898 could not claim the dominion of its predecessor, the Republic of Hawaiʿi. The Republic had never ceded its dominion to the U.S. Unlike the Provisional Government and the Republic there was no basis by which the U.S. could claim the dominion held by the Republic of Hawaiʿi." (2015, Chang, pdf pp. 34-35 http://blog.hawaii.edu/aplpj/files/…/09/APLPJ_16_2_Chang.pdf)
#OverthrowOHA
Hoʻoulu ka Lāhui/Race/ Ethnicity/Resistance to a Drive for White Hegemony/and More
Mahalo a nui to Emilia Kandagawa for passing me this incredibly interesting archive find—an 1884 petition of 78 Hilo subjects promoting the idea of immigration from India to the Hawaiian Kingdom.
Brings up some fascinating questions....
...
Mahalo a nui to Emilia Kandagawa for passing me this incredibly interesting archive find—an 1884 petition of 78 Hilo subjects promoting the idea of immigration from India to the Hawaiian Kingdom.
Brings up some fascinating questions....
...
My quick drive-by translation—not for any official or research purposes—is included below.
[Petition of the District of Hilo put before the Nobles and Representatives assembled at the Hawaiian Kingdom Legislature.
[We, subjects of His Majesty the King of the Hilo District of Hawaiʻi , humbly request to allow the entrance of "Indians" into the Hawaiian Kingdom in order to increase the Hawaiian nation and we believe that this will grow the lahui because of thier like skin color to that of the Hawaiian race and this will be a blessing for the Kingdom.]
So, this seems to be a continuation of Mōʻī Kalākaua's attempts to find compatible races to help increase the Kanaka 'Ōiwi population. But the petition comes not from the government but to the government from these people from Hilo. My first question question is how have these petitioners come up with "Lahui Inia?" Was there a someone in town who they knew and liked/respected? Was it a committee? A political group? Was it this representativeʻs idea and he got support? all research I dont have time for.. but am thankful to have been shared the info with. hhjj
[Leg records, petitions, 1884, Hawaiʻi State Archives]
See More[Petition of the District of Hilo put before the Nobles and Representatives assembled at the Hawaiian Kingdom Legislature.
[We, subjects of His Majesty the King of the Hilo District of Hawaiʻi , humbly request to allow the entrance of "Indians" into the Hawaiian Kingdom in order to increase the Hawaiian nation and we believe that this will grow the lahui because of thier like skin color to that of the Hawaiian race and this will be a blessing for the Kingdom.]
So, this seems to be a continuation of Mōʻī Kalākaua's attempts to find compatible races to help increase the Kanaka 'Ōiwi population. But the petition comes not from the government but to the government from these people from Hilo. My first question question is how have these petitioners come up with "Lahui Inia?" Was there a someone in town who they knew and liked/respected? Was it a committee? A political group? Was it this representativeʻs idea and he got support? all research I dont have time for.. but am thankful to have been shared the info with. hhjj
[Leg records, petitions, 1884, Hawaiʻi State Archives]
Any Ideas on effectively communicating with politicians on local corporate activities that "We the people" are against ??
Aina Clean up day 'Ohikililo.
Clean up Kupuna's Final resting place. Date March 10th 2018 Saturday 10 am til pua hana. Bring gloves and water.
We may do a pot luck so if you can bring some mea'ai Mahalo
Clean up Kupuna's Final resting place. Date March 10th 2018 Saturday 10 am til pua hana. Bring gloves and water.
We may do a pot luck so if you can bring some mea'ai Mahalo
Click for more
45 Years Ago Schoolhouse Rock! Was Released
…
12,297,637 Views
Who Remembers? added a new episode on 
Facebook Watch.
🎶 I'm just a bill. Yes, I'm only a bill and I'm sitting here on Capitol Hill. 🎶
Facebook Watch.🎶 I'm just a bill. Yes, I'm only a bill and I'm sitting here on Capitol Hill. 🎶
No comments:
Post a Comment