Friday, September 14, 2018

Opinions Shared About Self Proclaimers Such as Keanu Sai, Leon Siu, et. als.

The following are opinions of a person who used to be with us and defends the Self Proclaimers:


San Tah

Thu, Sep 13, 12:34 AM (1 day ago)
to me
I do not know how Hawaiian Kingdom can resolve its occupancy  problem without international support . Obviously the oviously the us courts for profit  have  no inretest and will resist any change in the status que.  They stole it and hold it to this day by force of arms and propaganda to keep the popular opinion devoid of the true HISTORICAL facts of the armed robbery of a country only a small minority are aware of the truth of the  historical facts . 
Whitehouse e-mail...........fyi

Amelia Gora Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 5:21 PM

To: San Tah

Bcc: Amelia Gora

Hi,

Sai among the others who self proclaim themselves are in the business of taking monies from poor Hawaiians.

If you noticed, more than 400 people gave monies to him and he ran with it.......

His partner Donald Lewis  is on the lam.......and changes his phones regularly to not get arrested.......due to affiliations with the PERFECT TITLE SCAM........

The Whitehouse letter is an admission by Trump that he will be operating with Rule of Law and the U.S. Constitution.......

Remember the time when GW Bush said that the "U.S. Constitution was just a Damn piece of paper?"  Check it out:

President George W. Bush is on the record as having said the Constitution of this United States is "just a piece of paper.". This same president has condoned torture and reserved the right to waive habeas corpus when he thinks it is necessary.


How can the answer be improved?
Tell us how
 Keanu Sai is NOT our family.....
aloha.

1822 -  Secret Treaty of Verona Contributor:  Wolfram Graetz


           The Secret Treaty of Verona was signed by Austria, France, Russia, Prussia, United States and the Vatican.  Reference from the Congressional files uncovered by researcher Wolfram Graetz.  The move towards One World Order/New World Order is indicated here:

EXTRACT FROM THE 1916 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD SENATE

Senator Owen: I wish to put in the Record the secret treaty of Verona of November 22, 1822, showing what this ancient conflict is between the rule of the few and the rule of the many. I wish to call the attention of the Senate to this treaty because it is the threat of this treaty which was the basis of the Monroe doctrine. It throws a powerful white light upon the conflict between monarchical government and government by the people. The Holy Alliance under the influence of Metternich, the Premier of Austria, in 1822, issued this remarkable secret document:

AMERICAN DIPLOMATIC CODE, 1778-1884

The undersigned, specially authorized to make some additions to the treaty of the Holy Alliance, after having exchanged their respective credentials, have agreed as follows:
ARTICLE 1. The high contracting powers, being convinced that the system of representative government is equally as incompatible with the monarchical principles as the maxim of the sovereignty of the people with the divine right, engage mutually, in the most solemn manner, to use all that their efforts to put an end to the system of representative governments, in whatever county it may exist in Europe, and to prevent it being introduced in those countries where it is not yet known.
ARTICLE 2. As it can not be doubted that the liberty of the press is the most powerful means used by the pretended supporters of the rights of nations to the detriment of those of princes, the high contracting parties promise reciprocally to adopt all proper measures to suppress it, not only in their own States but also in the rest of Europe.
ARTICLE 3. Convinced that the principles of religion contribute most powerfully to keep nations in the state of passive obedience which they owe to their princes, the high contracting parties declare it to be their intention to sustain in their respective States those measures which clergy may adopt, with the aim of ameliorating their own interests, intimately connected with the preservation of the authority of the princes and the contracting powers join in offering their thanks to the Pope for what he has already done for them, and solicit his constant cooperation in their views of submitting the nations.
ARTICLE 4. The situation of Spain and Portugal unite unhappily all the circumstances to which this treaty has particular reference. The contracting parties, in confiding to France the care of putting an end to them, engaged to assist her in the matter which may the least compromit [sic] them with their own people and the people of France by means of a subsidy on the part of the two empires of 20,000,000 of francs every year from the date of the signature of this treaty to the end of the war.
ARTICLE 5. In order to establish in the Peninsula in the order of things which existed before the revolution of Cadiz, and to insure the entire execution of the articles of the present treaty, the high contracting parties give to each other the reciprocal assurance that as long as their views are not fulfilled, rejecting all other ideas of utility or other measure to be taken, they will address themselves with the shortest possible delay to all the authorities existing in their States and to all their agents in foreign countries, with the view to establish connections tending toward the accomplishment of the objects proposed by this treaty.
ARTICLE 6. This treaty shall be renewed with such changes as new circumstances may give occasion for, either at a new congress or at the court of one of the contracting parties, as soon as the war with Spain shall be terminated.
ARTICLE 7. The present treaty shall be ratified and the ratifications exchanged at Paris within the space of six months.
Made at Verona the 22nd November, 1822.
for Austria: METTERNICH
for France: CHATEAUBRIAND
for Prussia: BERNSTET
for Russia: NESSELRODE
Senator Owen: "This Holy Alliance, having put a Bourdon prince upon the throne of France by force, then used France to suppress the condition of Spain, immediately afterwards, and by this very treaty gave her a subsidy of 20,000,000 francs annually to enable her to wage war upon the people of Spain and prevent their exercise of any measure of the right of self-government. The Holy Alliance immediately did not same thing in Italy, by sending Austrian troops to Italy, where the people there attempted to exercise a like measure of liberal constitutional self-government; and it was not until the printing press, which the Holy Alliance so stoutly opposed, taught the people of Europe the value of liberty that finally one country after another seized a greater and greater right of self-government, until now it may be fairly said that nearly all the nations of Europe have a very large measure of self-government.
"However, I wish to call the attention of the Senate to this important history in the growth of constitutional popular self- government. The Holy Alliance made its powers felt by the wholesale drastic suppression of the press in Europe, by universal censorship, by killing free speech and all ideas of popular rights, and by the complete suppression of popular government. The Holy Alliance having destroyed popular government in Spain, and Italy, had well-laid plains also to destroy popular government in the American Colonies which had revolted from Spain and Portugal in Central and South America under the influence of the successful example of the United States."
"It was because of this conspiracy against the American Republics by the European monarchies that the great English statesman, Canning, called the attention of our government to it, and our statesmen then, including Thomas Jefferson, who was still living at that time, took an active part to bring about the declaration by President Monroe in his next annual message to the Congress of the United States that the United States would regard it as an act of hostility to the government of the United States and an unfriendly act, if this coalition, or if any power of Europe ever undertook to establish upon the American continent any control of any American republic, or to acquire any territorial rights.
"This is the so-called Monroe Doctrine. The threat under the secret treaty of Verona to suppress popular government in the American republics is the basis of the Monroe Doctrine. This secret treaty sets fourth clearly the conflict between monarchial government and popular government, and the government of the few as against the government on the many."
(Senator Owen, Congressional Record 1916)
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 3:40 PM San Tah <igetuwant@gmail.com> wrote:
 11th fThe whitehouse letter in canned propaganda bullshit for the gullable .trump.is President of  a  corp. For profit.  You say I'm a protected person under the Hawaiian Kingdom but I do not feel protected  at all .no one is protecting me from police kidnapping  and ransom no one comes to court  and protects me against is domestic law in a occupyed country  no one does anything or protects me when all my Things are stolen .  Etc.  etc.   I do not see you legally petetioning the international courts to protect me. You say the land is legally yours but you do not occupy it after you send notice kick anyone off the land that is yours you claim.  The u ited States will do e eeythi g above and below the table to remain in possession  get a judge to quash all legal actions before they answer appear etc. It their m.o.  they do not want it to be aired in court they be we want it to get past their JUDGES period  if your so legally smart why are u not fight in the international courts making you position known??? Being the presence with the legal filings  a house decided and keeping it self that way. The USA corporation can not pay the trillions in damages  so the play legal laberant to stall forever and it has worked for a 100 plus years  keeping the Hawaiians divided  fighti g aming them selfs putting each others efforts down. Make the USA fight  real easy.


On Sep 13, 2018 2:04 PM, "San Tah" <igetuwant@gmail.com> wrote:
Amelia I need to bring something to your attention you perhaps do not grasp the only one legally fighting in the internatio al arena is "not you" but Dr. SHI  attacking him for what you say is him taking a hit in federal court was antisapated by those legal minds  he has to exist his remedies  their  before taking them on at the Hague. Do you think they just going to say "my bad" and hand it all back . Anyone fighting for Hawaii is on your side yet you are and keep the hoiae divided  in factions the USA could not be happier with you on their side to attack Dr. Sui.  Please show me your people in that arena mounting any legal challenge I would like to meet them Read their breifs.   Because they must be I visible  . Where is your well written leg briefs  you funded and filed ???? 


On Sep 13, 2018 2:16 AM, "Amelia Gora" <hawaiianhistory@gmail.com> wrote:
fyi........btw Rule of Law, U.S. Constitution is the agenda for President Trump........the treaties are the supreme law of the land, Article 6 of the U.S. Constitution............which is why Trump is hated right now by former criminal based Presidents......

and.........we are the bloodlines of bernice Pauahi and our great great great grandmother is "next of kin" in Probate........in other words, we are the true owners of the entire estate......charles reed bishop had only a life interest........liens are in place....... till next time.....take care.


---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Amelia Gora <hawaiianhistory@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 1:31 AM
Subject: Whitehouse e-mail...........fyi
To: Amelia Gora <hawaiianhistory@gmail.com>





Royal Tidings No. 2018-0913 Royal Families news on the web - Sharing a Preview of What's to Come...




Royal Tidings No. 2018-0913 ROYAL FAMILIES news on the web  

Thursday, September 13, 2018



IMPORTANT KEEPER! - Why U.S. President Trump Is Unpopular ---Because He Believes In Rule of Law AND the U.S. Constitution!: U.S. President Trump's Message via e-mail dated August 8, 2018 From The White House

IMPORTANT KEEPER! - Why U.S. President Trump Is Unpopular ---Because He Believes In Rule of Law AND the U.S. Constitution!:  U.S. President Trump's Message via e-mail dated August 8, 2018 From The White House

                                                             The following message was sent to me and for some reason many people want a copy of this!

                                                                           posted by Amelia Gora (2018)


fyi...….from President Trump...…….

Now do you see why the Haters hate him....including former Presidents Clinton, Bush, Obama?

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: The White House <noreply@whitehouse.gov>
Date: Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 11:42 AM
Subject: Response to Your Message
To: hawaiianhistory@gmail.com <hawaiianhistory@gmail.com>


The White House, Washington
Thank you for taking the time to express your views regarding our Nation’s judiciary.
The rule of law, including equality under the law and protection of individual liberties, is America’s cornerstone. As President, I am committed to nominating judges who will support the Constitution and apply the law as written.
As part of my pledge to stand for the rule of law, I promised the American people that I would nominate individuals to the Supreme Court who will faithfully adhere to our Constitution and the laws of our great Nation. In keeping with that pledge, shortly after my inauguration, I nominated Justice Neil Gorsuch, a dedicated constitutionalist, to replace the late, great Justice Antonin Scalia. On July 9, 2018, to fill the vacancy created by Justice Anthony Kennedy’s retirement, I was pleased to nominate Judge Brett Kavanaugh of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Judge Kavanaugh has impeccable credentials, unsurpassed qualifications, and a proven commitment to the Constitution and its protections. In the coming months, I look forward to working with the United States Senate as it fulfills its constitutional duty of advising on my nomination and deciding whether to provide its consent.
Thank you again for writing. To learn more about my decision to nominate Judge Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, please visit www.WhiteHouse.gov/JusticeKavanaugh. I am confident that like Justice Gorsuch, Judge Kavanaugh will decide court cases based on the law and not his personal policy preferences or ideology.
Sincerely,
Donald Trump
Privacy Policy | Contact the White House
*********************

This was my response:

IOLANI - The Royal Hawk

Translate

Powered by Google TranslateTranslate

Friday, August 10, 2018


Hawaiian Kingdom Legal Response No. 2018-0810 Responding to your Rule of Law Message from Amelia Gora, a Royal person, Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, etc.









  

 

 



U.S. President Donald Trump

Secretary of State  
Governor David Ige - entity State of Hawaii
Mayors - entity State of Hawaii
Judges - entity State of Hawaii
Honolulu Police Department l- entity State of Hawaii
Sheriffs Department - entity State of Hawaii, et. als.  



Many Interested others  



Greetings,  



I've received a letter from your office about a new Judge in town.



It is not the response that I've expected based on the numerous official letters/legal messages sent to your office for a proper response.



The most recent letter called for the arrests of "Princess Abigail Kawananakoa" for fraud, lies, defrauding our Royal Families; James Wright - a descendant of usurper Gerritt Parmele Judd - a documented conspirator, pirate, genocide activist, and Judge Browning who promotes fraud, criminal claims by the entity State of Hawaii representative Attorney General, et. als. claiming to be supporting the Receiver Wright in selling lands, assets, etc. belonging to our Royal Families.



I have also filed Honolulu Police Reports for "Princess Abigail Kawananakoa", Kamehameha Schools/KSBE/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates Trustees, et. als. for fraud, lies, etc.

Kamehameha Schools/KSBE/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates Trustees


The trustees claimed to be the heirs in Land Court Case #1228, which is a Fraud.


Update

The trustees cannot be heirs.  It is documented in the Tilden Trust from the U.S. Supreme Court.
Reference:  


  1. https://www.nypl.org/sites/default/files/archivalcollections/pdf/...
    Source: Received from the Tilden Estate and Trust, 1927-1930. Abstract: The Tilden Trust was incorporated in 1887 after the death in 1886 of Samuel J. Tilden, attorney, governor of New York in 1874 and 1875, and U.S. presidential candidate in 1876.
  2. Tilden Trust - Wikipedia

    Through several legal deals, the trust was still founded, and had a fund of two and a quarter million dollars. By that time, the money was not enough to fund a complete library, and in 1895, the Tilden Trust was merged with the Lenox Library and Astor Library to form the New York Public Library.
*****************

The following is the recent status of the U.S. Views on the ICC/International Criminal Courts:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-45474864#_=_

John Bolton threatens ICC with US sanctions




Media playback is unsupported on your device


Bolton: 'The ICC is dead to us'

Media captionBolton: "The ICC is dead to us"

The US has threatened sanctions against the International Criminal Court (ICC) if it goes ahead with prosecutions against Americans.
The court is currently considering prosecuting US servicemen over alleged detainee abuse in Afghanistan.
National Security Adviser John Bolton called the court "illegitimate" and vowed the US would do everything "to protect our citizens".
The US is among dozens of nations not to have joined the court.

What is the ICC?

The court investigates and brings to justice people responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes, intervening when national authorities cannot or will not prosecute.
The ICC was established by a UN treaty in 2002, and has been ratified by 123 countries, including the UK.
However several countries, including China, India, and Russia, have refused to join.
Some African countries have called for withdrawal from the court over perceived unfair treatment of Africans.

Why is John Bolton opposed to it?

The US has been critical of the ICC since it was established - and Mr Bolton has been particularly vocal in his opposition to the court.
In his speech on Monday in Washington, Mr Bolton attacked two areas of the court's work.
AdChoices
ADVERTISING
The first was ICC prosecutor Fatou Bensouda's request last year for a full investigation into alleged war crimes in Afghanistan, which would include any committed by US military and intelligence officials.
A 2016 report from the ICC said there was a reasonable basis to believe the US military had committed torture at secret detention sites in Afghanistan operated by the CIA, and that the Afghan government and the Taliban had committed war crimes.


US troops in Logar, Afghanistan Image copyrightReuters
Image caption US personnel in Afghanistan could be subjected to ICC investigations
Mr Bolton said neither Afghanistan nor any government signatory to the ICC's statute had requested an investigation.
However, ICC prosecutors also have the ability to take independent action, although any prosecutions must be approved by a panel of judges.
The second area Mr Bolton addressed was the Palestinian move to bring Israel before the ICC over allegations of human rights abuses in Gaza and the occupied West Bank - a move dismissed by Israel as politicised.
Mr Bolton said the Palestinian move was one of the reasons the US administration had decided to close the Palestinians' diplomatic mission in Washington.
In his tirade against the court, Mr Bolton said it:
  • Was a threat to "American sovereignty and US national security"
  • Lacked checks and balances, claimed "jurisdiction over crimes that have disputed and ambiguous definitions" and failed to "deter and punish atrocity crimes"
  • Was "superfluous" as the US administration did "not recognise any higher authority than the US Constitution"
Mr Bolton said: "We will not co-operate with the ICC. We will provide no assistance to the ICC. We will not join the ICC. We will let the ICC die on its own. After all, for all intents and purposes, the ICC is already dead to us."
White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders backed Mr Bolton, saying President Donald Trump would use "any means necessary to protect our citizens [and] those of our allies from unjust prosecution from the ICC".

What steps could the US take?



Judges at the ICC at the trial of Congolese warlord Bosco Ntaganda, 28 August 2018 Image copyrightReuters
Image caption The court in The Hague was founded in 2002 by a treaty known as the Rome Statute
ICC judges and prosecutors would be barred from entering the US and their funds in the US would be targeted.
"We will prosecute them in the US criminal system. We will do the same for any company or state that assists an ICC investigation of Americans," Mr Bolton said.
More "binding, bilateral agreements" would be signed to stop countries submitting US citizens to the court's jurisdiction.

What has the response been?

The ICC has pledged to "continue to do its work undeterred, in accordance with... the overarching idea of the rule of law".
"The ICC, as a judicial institution, acts strictly within the legal framework of the Rome Statute and is committed to the independent and impartial exercise of its mandate," it said in a statement, referring to the treaty that established the ICC.
Liz Evenson, associate international justice director at Human Rights Watch, told AFP news agency that Mr Bolton had shown "callous disregard for victims of atrocity crimes" and that the US was "more concerned with coddling serial rights abusers... than supporting impartial justice".

How have previous US administrations dealt with the ICC?

The US has had a varied history with the ICC.
The US signed a treaty to establish the ICC in 2000, under President Bill Clinton's administration.
The US said it strongly supported "international accountability" but believed the treaty, known as the Rome Statute, had "significant flaws" that still needed addressing.
However, the US never ratified the treaty.


Bill Clinton, Barack Obama and George W Bush in discussion at a event in April 2013 Image copyrightThe White House
Image caption Presidents Bill Clinton, Barack Obama and George W Bush all took different approaches to the ICC
In 2002, shortly before the court was formally established, President George W Bush's administration told the UN that the US would not join the ICC.
President Barack Obama took a more positive approach to the ICC. He sought to develop co-operation with the ICC and sent observers to the court, although his administration also opted not to ratify the Rome Statute.

'America First' writ large

By Tara McKelvey, BBC White House reporter
As a diplomat, John Bolton was famously bellicose: he once said if the UN building in New York "lost 10 storeys, it wouldn't make a bit of difference".
And he's made clear how he stands on carrot-and-stick diplomacy, saying: "I don't do carrots." As national security adviser, he's been more aggressive than the president at times - and has been reined in.
On Monday, though, Mr Bolton made his first major address as national security adviser and showed he's in sync with the president.
In threatening to take sanctions against ICC judges, he is helping to reinforce the president's "America First" policy.
************************************************************
facebook:




iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com
The following are opinions of a person who used to be with us and defends the Self Proclaimers: San Tah Thu, Sep 13, 12:34 ...

No comments:

Post a Comment