1 year ago.
Clifford Kapono
TELL ME WHY YOU LIED
From the most causal of observations it appears, the US Constitutionʻs 14th Amendment is compromised with tax revenues going to native Hawaiians bifurcated by a predominately non-Hawaiian government which benefits the majority in Hawaii who are Japanese. Herein the racial obfuscation of designated US Federal Revenue is continually violated under its constitution.
Interestingly enough, the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits most discrimination on the basis of race and gender (and also alienage and national origin), but only when practiced by the government. But the more significant question ask why these racial practices exist?
Why is it that the US Federal Government looks to financially support interest directly impacting native Hawaiians by blood quantum and the state recognizes this practice with their amended position on quantum but recognizes the race as Native Hawaiian? Why do Hawaiians have agencies designated specifically for Hawaiians ie., Department of Hawaiian Homes and Office of Hawaiian Affairs which are state agencies and Queens Hospital and Kamehameha Schools which also give preference to Hawaiians? Why?
Is it because Hawaiians technically are still a foreign entity to the United States therein equally foreign to the 50th State of the United States? It would appear that Hawaii is a foreign entity to the US which would sanction the exceptions of national and international practices that are contiguous with politics in Hawaii. For example, if Hawaii is part of the United States as its 50th State, then where in America can a foreign entity do business without the presence of the US State Department? Answer: nowhere. And, if this is so, then where is the US State Department on Mauna Kea where there are numerous foreign entities doing business on the mountain? Secondly, how is it that US Federal Taxes paid by US citizens are earmarked for native Hawaiian on a race based argument in clear violation of the US Constitution?
The only way these conditions can occur are if Hawaii is a foreign country to the US. Herein, taxes paid to Hawaii would come under the Foreign Assistance Act, and those foreign countries onMauna Kea would be out of US jurisdiction so the US State Department would not be relevant.
Given the extensive population of brilliant legal minds in America, with exemplary jurisprudence in both domesticated international law, it is highly unlikely that someone screwed up legally by not recognizing the aforementioned infractions of law. So why are Na Kanaka bound to a tertiary role as citizens of the US with no claim to our assets unless by governmental oversight without contractual capacity? When Na Kanaka are outraged at the malfeasance of state governance by multiple examples of dereliction of duty, where fiduciary responsibilities have been compromised and only allowed by Hawaii Revised Statutory Law that somehow satisfies federal statute relative to the rules of occupation, we the native people of Hawaii are denied an appellate process under our sense of law and self identity as we exercise our freedom of speech and expression.
I get the economic argument that if assets are not employed for the general good, then an oversight ruling is necessary to meet the goals of general welfare. What I donʻt get is why Na Kanaka are prejudiciously treated in violation of both 5th and 14th Amendments to the US Constitution in our democratic attempt at exercising our 1st Amendment rights. How does that work under a democracy?
This current state of confusion can no longer arrest Na Kanaka for our goals of "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" an equally well-known phrase in the United States Declaration of Independence, which this phrase gives three examples of the "unalienable rights" which the Declaration says it has been given to all human beings by their Creator, and which governments are created to protect.
He nana e na kanaka makou. kuʻe kakou. imua !
jus sayʻn©
No comments:
Post a Comment