Friday, August 2, 2019

LAW FAIL: 1) IDENTITY THEFT, 2) NO JURISDICTION - ILLEGAL U.S. LAW APPLICATIONS ON PRIVATE PROPERTIES OF THE KAMEHAMEHA'S FROM A NEUTRAL, FRIENDLY NATION - the Hawaiian Kingdom 3) FAIL TO APPLY HAWAIIAN KINGDOM LAWS


LAW FAIL:  1)  IDENTITY THEFT, 2) NO JURISDICTION - ILLEGAL U.S. LAW APPLICATIONS ON PRIVATE PROPERTIES OF THE KAMEHAMEHA'S FROM A NEUTRAL, FRIENDLY NATION - the Hawaiian Kingdom 3) FAIL TO APPLY HAWAIIAN KINGDOM LAWS
                                             Review by Amelia Gora (2019)

 The following are the three (3) major Law Fails made by Aliens in the Hawaiian Islands:

1.  IDENTITY THEFT


In 1912, the Case PA PELEKANE, the "territory" of Hawaii claimed to be the "successor of the Kingdom of Hawaii.

This is a case of Identity Theft.

The "successors of the Kingdom of Hawaii/Hawaiian Kingdom" is Not the Territory of the United States.

The Kamehameha's are the true heirs and successors of the Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii.

Reference:  HAWAIIAN REPORTS, PA PELEKANE, 1912, Supreme Court Law Library, Archives, Main Library, Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaii.


2.  NO JURISDICTION

Global Legal Monitor


Home | Search | Browse All Jurisdictions | Browse All Topics | Browse All Authors | RSS | Top Recent Articles


United States: Supreme Court Rules that U.S. Apology for Overthrowing Hawaiian Monarchy Does Not Affect Hawaii Public Lands

(Apr. 10, 2009) The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on March 31, 2009, that a 1993 Congressional resolution apologizing for the role of the United States in overthrowing the Hawaiian monarchy in 1893 does not affect the right of the State of Hawaii to sell public lands.
U.S. officials participated in the 1893 overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii. In 1898, the U.S. annexed Hawaii and obtained ownership of all public and crown lands. In 1959, when Hawaii became a state, the U.S. granted the state government all lands it had obtained in 1898, to be held by the state as a public trust. Hawaii state law authorizes the state to sell the public lands, provided the proceeds are held in trust for Hawaiian citizens. A 1993 joint resolution by the U.S. Congress apologized for the role of the U.S. in overthrowing the Hawaiian monarchy. The resolution provided that nothing in the resolution was “intended to serve as a settlement of any claims against the United States.” (Joint Resolution to Acknowledge the 100th Anniversary of the Overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii, Public Law No. 103-150, 107 Stat. 1510 (1993), available at http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=103_cong_bills
&docid=f:sj19enr.txt.pdf.)
Hawaii's Housing Finance and Development Corporation (HFDC) received approval to remove a tract of former crown land from the public trust and redevelop it, upon compensating the Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA), which manages funds from the use or sale of ceded lands for the benefit of native Hawaiians. Relying on the apology resolution, OHA demanded that, in addition to monetary compensation, the payment include a disclaimer preserving native Hawaiian claims to the lands. When HFDC declined, citing the difficulty in obtaining title insurance when land title is clouded, OHA sued to enjoin the sale of the parcel until final determination of native Hawaiians' claims. The state trial court entered a judgment against OHA. The Supreme Court of Hawaii vacated that judgment, ruling that the 1993 apology resolution dictated that it enjoin all sales of lands ceded to the U.S. in 1898 until resolution of the claims of native Hawaiians to those lands. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.
The Court first ruled that it had jurisdiction in this matter, because the Hawaii Supreme Court's decision rested on federal law, the 1993 apology resolution. The Court then held that the apology resolution did not strip Hawaii of its sovereign authority to sell the lands the U.S. granted the state upon its admission to the Union. The Court said that neither of the two substantive provisions of the apology resolution – one that apologized for the role of the U.S. in overthrowing the Hawaiian monarchy, and another that disclaimed that the resolution served to settle any claims against the U.S. – affected Hawaii's right to sell the land granted it by the U.S. when Hawaii was admitted as a state. The Court also ruled that the numerous “whereas” clauses at the beginning of the resolution did not have operative effect on Hawaii's rights to sell public lands. (Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs, No. 07-1372 (Mar. 31, 2009), available at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/08pdf/07-1372.pdf..)
Author: Luis Acosta
Jurisdiction: United States
Date: April 10, 2009
 Reference:  http://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/2017/09/vol-vi-no-668-part-1a-exposing-false.html

Public Notice/Legal Notice:  Cease and Desist Ige, Alien Agent Introducing Harm to Our Neutral, Friendly People posted by Amelia Gora, a Royal person, Representative of our Royal Families, Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, Konohiki/Royal Families Konohiki, House of Nobles member, Judicial Tribunal Judge, Hawaiian Kingdom Supreme Court Judge, Land owner, Landlord, Representative of the Hawaiian Genealogical Society (2019))

Alien Ige is Not the land owner, the entity State are Identity thieves documented -see 1912 HAWAIIAN REPORTS - Pa Pelekane case, Supreme Court/Archives/Main Library....am awaiting France's response because the U.S., France, and Great Britain have a Protectorate over the Hawaiian Islands since the time of Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli.  The Royal Families are here which means that the Hawaiian Kingdom never went away.  Also, Dr. DeZayas letters shows the criminal issues that Ige et. als. face...there is No Annexation, legal research by Professor Williamson Chang also shows that it is illegal.....planned/premeditation found shows that the U.S. looked to annex Hawaii since 1840 or the time of U.S. Presidents Tyler, Taylor, Fillmore, Pierce, Johnson, Grant, and Harrison ----  the Protectorates are documented....can Alien Ige show jurisdiction over lands that our House of Nobles - Hawaiian Kingdom are assigned to take care of.....we found the Deeds for the Crown Lands and Government lands....and Alien Ige is Not on It!  and can Alien Ige show his allegiance to the U.S. Constitution upon entering his job with the entity State .....and can Alien Ige refute the facts that the 1849/1850 Treaty of the Hawaiian Kingdom has a Supremacy Clause - Treaties are the Supreme Law of the land...... and as Mahealani Asing Kahau pointed out recently, can Alien Ige, et als. produce their FAR's - demand to see their

Foreign Agent Registration Statement
& Anti-Bribery Statement in accordance to the Foreign Agent Registration Act of 1938....did you know that the U.S. gave the protectorate to the Provisional government, a conspiracy set up by William O. Smith, Charles Reed Bishop, Lorrin Thurston, Sanford B. Dole, Curtis Iaukea, Celso Moreno, Boyd, Booth, Robert Wilcox, Mott-Smith, Akaka in Washington, D.C., et. als.  also, the additional facts that our Queen Liliuokalani was under duress nulls and voids all claims, conspiracies also nulls and voids all claims......the court of original jurisdiction remains the Hawaiian Kingdom courts as found in research... all nations have to comply with the Cease and Desist order because U.S. President Trump is on record that he believes and applies 'Rule of Law' and the U.S. Constitution in the email that the Whitehouse sent to me.  The issues of a permanent friendship treaty and the evidence of Protectorates, treaties with other nations cannot be negated by Alien Ige who can be charged with piracy, pillaging, racketeering in a peaceful neutral friendly nation with the intent to utilize warring activities on private properties of our Royal Families who are heirs and successors of Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli…….Is Alien Ige knowing that he is a documented squatter on our Royal Families lands and there are ramifications of his actions.....does Alien Ige know that he and others are Not part of the permanent treaty?  We are Not the ones who have done wrong.  Does Alien Ige know that he and others are blatantly in violation of the U.S. Constitution and can be arrested, etc.  See Article XIV of the Treaty of 1850, and see Article 6 of the U.S. Constitution.  Also, Alien Ige will have to show his claim to jurisdiction, and present his FAR Foreign Agent Registration Statement & Anti-Bribery Statement in accordance to the Foreign Agent Registration Act of 1938.  Lastly, my filings of the Affidavit/Lien No. 96-177455 filed on 12/17/96 (281 pages) at the Bureau of Conveyances, Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaii has irrefutable evidence of genealogies, crown land owners, premeditation evidence, etc. and I was told that it was a Lien on all of the islands......in addition, we are the heirs of not only the lands but also the seas around the islands as documented by Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli as recently found in deeds......So Alien Ige has much to defend himself against the legal, honest claims of our Royal Families.  This is posted as a Legal Notice on Facebook and posted to U.S. President Trump, et. als. as well.  p.s. Alien Ige is now faced with the crimes against our innocent people including our Royal Families who descend from Kalaniopuu, Kamehameha, Kaumualii, John Young, and Isaac Davis et. als. descendants.....and Charles Reed Bishop had only a life interest which was lost upon his death, both he and Bernice Pauahi were conspirators/treasonous persons documented, which means that the Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates / KSBE Trustees are Not the landowners and they too are subjects to crimes against our Royal Families.  Wicked, truly wicked.



3) FAIL TO APPLY HAWAIIAN KINGDOM LAWS 

Read the following letters:
Dr. Alfred DeZayas 2nd Letter, and the First Letter to Routhe Bolomet Validating the Existence of the Hawaiian Kingdom etc.

                                                                   posted by Amelia Gora (2019)

https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn%3Aaaid%3Ascds%3AUS%3A294a398c-cf2c-4623-8841-2aaf7cf3145b

Dr. Alfred DeZayas 1st Letter

SUMMARY

Conspiracies, premeditation to takeover a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation is documented.

The above are some of the many issues found which shows the piracy(s), pillaging, genocide, racketeering against a neutral, friendly nation called the Hawaiian Kingdom which became a recognized nation by the U.S., Great Britain, France, Belgium, etc.

The above shows some of the failures documented by the U.S. which was recognized as a protectorate with Great Britain, and France.

Treaties are also documented.

The Law Fails are hereby shown above with evidence found in research, etc.

aloha.
*************************************





at

No comments:

Post a Comment