Sean HayworthtoAha Aloha 'Aina
I'd like to pose this question here because there are more educated people than I who potentially have better understandings to these issues than I do.
Yesterday I read an interesting article in the post, written by Bob Sigall Talking about the "Late Great" Robert Holt. Describing how he "Purchased the ahupuaa of makaha" from Abner Paki.
As a lot of us have been enlightened to, land "tenure/ownership/stewardship" was delegated differently in the classic kanaka structure then officiated and legitimized on paper through the Royal Patents (RP) Granted by then King Kamehameha III through first going to the Board of Land Commissioners to acquire a Land Commission Award (LCA).
My question is: "How does one sell land that hasn't been acquired yet?"
Abner Paki LCA dated "Maraki" (March) 19, 1855
Abner Paki Dies June 13, 1855
Abner Paki finally received RP December 13, 1855.
Abner Paki LCA dated "Maraki" (March) 19, 1855
Abner Paki Dies June 13, 1855
Abner Paki finally received RP December 13, 1855.
How did Abner Paki "Sell" Makaha ahupuaa when he didn't officially acquire rights until after his passing? And why would he go through all the effort of acquiring an in•a•LIEN•able RP just to sell/alienate it directly afterward?
Unless!!!
He didn't actually sell anything?
Maybe Mr Holt had help from his friend "Judge" Hermann Widemann (Like Holt st. And Widemann st. In makaha?), the owner of Waianae Sugar Company. And they had a "Covenant" secret agreement to acquire the lands then alienating the land. That means that it would condition every property in makaha? Meaning that Everyone would have to agree and perpetuate this private-privy "covenant"?
He didn't actually sell anything?
Maybe Mr Holt had help from his friend "Judge" Hermann Widemann (Like Holt st. And Widemann st. In makaha?), the owner of Waianae Sugar Company. And they had a "Covenant" secret agreement to acquire the lands then alienating the land. That means that it would condition every property in makaha? Meaning that Everyone would have to agree and perpetuate this private-privy "covenant"?
So I looked into our deed (in makaha) to find a sneaky clause/covenant "Deleting Thereform... any preference... based on race or familial status."
So if someone was "unconscionable" (unaware), of a predated title (Royal Patent) wouldn't that be misrepresentation or otherwise a FRAUD(?!?) That everyone is required to without seeing the actual written covenant/contract/compact agreement?!? Which voids everything in makaha?!?
Where are the conveyance Documents that show the "purchasing" of the makaha ahupuaa?
This is not an attempt to create chaos, confusion, hate, dishonor or any other form of negative energy to anyone of any family or anything like that. I like anyone else trying to live in honor am just searching for the truth.
Can anyone share some insight?
Mahalo nui
Sean
Sean
