Sunday, December 8, 2019

Vol VII No. 782 - Part 3

TMT doesn’t own Mauna Kea they are a renter.
The guy that owns the house next to me rents to crack heads. Do I fight the crack heads or the owner of the house?
Always thought it was about the decision makers and NOT TMT.


Like

Comment
Comments


  • Steven Wilson the owner, but theres a difference between the two renters with the cracks heads the owners can lose their house and face charges
    2
  • Rodney Calio Jr. Gotta fight them both! They both feed off each other.
    6
  • Luke Ka'akau Jr. You fight both because as long as TMT wants to hold out, the government and Ige will likely stand firm with them. Once TMT decides to go, Ige them will fold. So the renter has more of a say than we are made to believe in this situation.
    Write a reply...

  • Christian Martin Wow!
    Really smart!
    Didn’t think it was that complicated.
    What if you get any politician that is going to run for office to sign a pledge?
    All officials from school board to governors otherwise black ball them!
    1
    • Ti Harrison Christian Martin it would be an incredible feat if any politician honored their pledges. They run on one platform & then do the polar opposite after the election. Signing pledges is akin to the verbal promises they break all the time. It's infuriating.
  • Image may contain: one or more people, people standing, sky, cloud, outdoor, nature and text
    5
  • Monica Mone't MAUNA KEA is private property. It is owned by the Blood relations of HRH King Kamehameha III. These lands known in history as the Crown Lands and I am the senior Mahu Wahine heir to these lands. My family ever since the illegal overthrow have been trying to get these lands restored to our family estate, the Kamehameha Estate. What we have learned in the past 127 years is that we can not make this happen alone. It will take the will of you the La Hui, with your moral claims and I as your Mo'i with my legal claims to these lands to petition the Congress and the Federal Government for the return of these lands. It is our hope that these lands will be used as a land base for the 2nd coming of, or the Restoration of the Kingdom of Hawaii. As Mo'i is my right and wish to give every square inch of my Crown Lands to you the La Hui, the Hawaiian Community. It comprises just short of one million acres. All that I ask in return is that you recognize me and swear your allegiance to the living Kamehameha Family. The possibilities are endless as to what we can do to make our culture flourish once again. The New Zealand Government gave back to the Maori Queen their ancestral lands. Let us prey that America will treat us with as much dignity and respect. Many American Indian and Alaskan tribes have been given their Sovereignty, how then can they deny us ours. Signed Ka Mo'i Wahine HRH Nahienaena for more info go to FB Restoration of the Kingdom of Hawaii.👑
    1
    • Amelia Gora let's see...there's a Sam Monet...any relationship to you? His name Monet was changed from MONIZ a Portuguese name.... know that line is a Kualii/Kahoohanohano and no mention of being a Kamehameha.....specific families are Kamehameha's....there's a genealogy gauntlet for all claiming to be a Kamehameha...just letting you know.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zUoPz90UA8
      The Kamehameha Waltz
      youtube.com
      The Kamehameha Waltz
      The Kamehameha Waltz

    Write a reply...



  • David Hekili Bell If the crackheads are trying to go to their rented house over your property you sure as hell can "fight" them
  • Bella Moopuna Your analogy is flawed because the owner who is renting to crackheads stole the property from my ohana. So i have to fight two sources of problems.
    4
  • Rona E Kahoonei TMT can decide that it’s not a proper place for them to build. If it’s sacred land and means too much to the people of Hawaii. Not a good comparison.....
  • Yuko Seki Not the simple. TMT also should pursue morally correct astronomy.
Write a comment...

Ku Kia’i Mauna! He keeps saying Mauna, Mauna. Even our younger keiki generation knows!!! 🔺❤️🔺❤️🔺

Comments
Someone is typing a comment...
Write a comment...

Clifford Kapono






















OHANA WEALTH
The wealth of a nation is founded on it’s people and those inherent to that nation are its beneficiaries. Those Hawaiians who are claiming sovereig...nty and independence, exactly how do they define that wealth factor a “native driven economic expression” to happen? To claim something as sacred, you must understand it’s inherent wealth and be able to translate that wealth into an expression of prosperity. Clearly those sacred trust for native Hawaiians have not benefited those defined as beneficiaries to the same degree of wealth as those who manage it.
Where are the native Hawaiian families here in Hawaii that have and continue to benefit themselves and the native Hawaiian community that defines them? There are wealthy families here in Hawaii but are they native Hawaiians and how did these people prosper? Why is it that so many corporations here in Hawaii prosper under the guise of being a Hawaiian business?
Family-controlled firms internationally now make up 19% of the companies in the Fortune Global 500, which tracks the world’s largest firms by sales. That is up from 15% in 2005, according to new research by McKinsey, a consulting firm (which defines such firms as ones whose founders or their families have the biggest stake, of at least 18%, plus the power to appoint the chief executive). Since 2008 sales by these firms have grown by 7% a year, slightly ahead of the 6.2% a year by non-family firms in the list. McKinsey sees these trends continuing for the foreseeable future.
This is largely because of rapid growth in big developing economies where family ownership is the norm among large businesses. Since 2005 the countries that have most increased their share of the Fortune Global 500 are Brazil, China, Russia, South Korea and Taiwan. By 2025, McKinsey forecasts, there will be more than 15,000 companies worldwide with at least $1 billion in annual revenues, of which 37% will be emerging-market family firms. In 2010 there were only 8,000 firms worldwide of this size, and only 16% of them were family-controlled and from emerging markets.
Around 85% of $1 billion-plus businesses in South-East Asia are family-run, around 75% in Latin America, 67% in India and around 65% in the Middle East. China (where the proportion is about 40%) and Sub-Saharan Africa (35%) stand out for their relatively low share of family firms, because in both cases many large firms are state-owned.
So, where are the Maoli or Maori wealthy families? We critically need to redefine what this cry for sovereignty and independence means aside from cultural protesting and academic curriculum bantering that clearly lacks competitive global wealth.
jus sayʻn ©
See More

Comments

No comments:

Post a Comment