Translate

Wednesday, May 2, 2018

Vol VII No. 701 - Part 2a: The U.S. Department of Interior And the B.I.A./Bureau of Indian Affairs Have NO SAY in the Hawaiian Islands - A Reminder to Many

Historical Preservation BIA and ACHP (106)

Amelia Gora Wed, May 2, 2018 at 4:57 AM

To: Ruthie Caudill

Hello Ruthie and others,

It's disturbing that the BIA is contacted when in reality, the Royal Families exists in the Hawaiian Islands and the conspiracies/piracies engaged in by the U.S. support of terrorists in the Hawaiian Islands gives no reason for the U.S. to further hide the facts that we are a separate, recognized nation.

It is issues of genocide.  It is issues of FALSE FLAG OPERATIONS, and kanaka maoli/kanaka Hawaii maoli are NOT Tribal peoples as defined by a nations that have Treaties documented between the King his heirs and successors and the U.S. President Zachary Taylor.

People don't understand that we are a Constitutional Monarchy government and not an ill fated Bureaucracy fulfilling Indian Affairs............Oppositions are documented to the Minister of Interior as seen in the films below:


2:59:22
July 2, 2014 the United States Department of the Interior meeting in Keaukaha to take public testimony on 5 questions regarding



Leon Siu, a Native Hawaiian award-winning composer, recording artist, performer and producer, one half of Leon & Malia, Siu is


Department of Interior Native Hawaiian Recognition Hearing Seattle, WA August 1, 2014 The U.S. Department of Interior has no


Host Kaui Lucas speaks with Jonathan Osorio (Kamakakūokalani Center for Hawaiian Studies, University of Hawai'i) about the


Department of Interior Native Hawaiian Recognition Hearing Seattle, WA August 1, 2014 The U.S. Department of Interior has no


The Department of Interior will be in the islands to meet about possibly establishing a government to government relationship
CC



A fiery meeting took place at the State Capitol as the U.S. Dept. of Interior listened to public comment on est

****************************************** 



Published on Aug 2, 2014

Subscribe 32
Department of Interior Native Hawaiian Recognition Hearing Seattle, WA August 1, 2014

The U.S. Department of Interior has no jurisdiction over the Hawaiian Kingdom and its citizens both Hawaiian and non-Hawaiian by ethnicity. Approximately 34 people were in attendance. 9 testified against Fed Wreck. 7 testified in favor of Fed Wreck which included the parents of Derek Kauanoe OHA Governance Manager. Both of them should have recused themselves from commenting to avoid any semblance of partiality or bias.

No to Fed Wreck.

Long live the Hawaiian Kingdom
!

*****************

The Department of Interior has No Say, the Bureau of Indian Affairs has No Say.....

I have watched the ongoing comments about the requests for the Indian Affairs and I add ALL of you Have No Say.

There was No Annexation, Opposition is documented over time, and Piracy(piracies) conspiracies are documented.

Our King documented that the U.S., and Great Britain has disabilities and they cannot own lands in the Hawaiian Islands.

We have an alodio land system and pirates have maneuvered to change the descriptions of our alodio system to a mere American Fee Simple status.





A video about the present day plundering of the Kingdom of Hawaii.




http://VoicesOfTruthTV.com - Imagine the surprise University Of Hawai`i Professor Williamson Chang got when he discovered the


The symposium, "I Ka Pono: The Future of Hawaiian Sovereignty," examines the resurgence of Native Hawaiian nationalism today






http://VoicesOfTruthTV.com - Imagine the surprise University Of Hawai`i Professor Williamson Chang got when he discovered the



The symposium, "I Ka Pono: The Future of Hawaiian Sovereignty," examines the resurgence of Native Hawaiian nationalism today


Premeditation Evidence, Conspiracies, Piracies documented.............lots of Evidence showing the U.S. moved to Pirate our lands, assets, gold, etc.       We are occupied, and we now have our House of Nobles, Judicial System, etc. in place.   Deoccupation is one of the goals.            Aole Pono.  Thank you Ruthie for some of your efforts in helping to expose more criminal activities in the Hawaiian Islands.  aloha.

On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 2:34 AM, Ruthie Caudill <ruthiejim13@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear William Dancing Feather,

Thank you for your answer.

Kanaka do not have BIA and have lost through illegal Conveyance, lands that are of significant  Historical value.

There is no Historic Preservation Officer to oversee this process.

Thank you for clarifying the BIA’s role.

Regards,

Ruthann Caudill



On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 8:11 AM William C. Dancing Feather <wdancingfeather@achp.gov> wrote:
Dear Ms. Caudill,

Thank you for contacting the ACHP. I don’t understand what you mean by “full BIA status”. The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) has Section 106 responsibilities when it determines it has an undertaking that might affect historic properties. That determination then starts the Section 106 process where the BIA is required to consult with the appropriate Tribal Historic Preservation Officer and or the State Historic Preservation Officer and others to identify historic properties and to avoid, minimize, or mitigate any effects the undertaking may have on identified historic properties.

If you have specific questions about the Section 106 process the ACHP provides a citizens guide to the 106 process located at http://www.achp.gov/citizensguide.html with a pdf file available for download. The ACHP also provides various classroom, webinars, and on-demand E-Learning courses available at http://www.achp.gov/training.html. To understand how BIA’s maintains its Section 106 responsibilities you must direct your questions to BIA and contact the agency directly.

If you have any questions about the 106 process please let me know.
Thank you again for contacting the ACHP.

Wm. Dancing Feather
Native American Program Analyst
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
202.517.0195
ACHP offers NEW free and low-cost e-learning courses for the public, applicants, and NEPA-106 practitioners.








From: Ruthie Caudill [mailto:ruthiejim13@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2018 12:54 AM
To: William C. Dancing Feather; Ruthie Caudill

Subject: Fwd: Full BIA for 106

Dear William C. Dancing Feather,

Valerie is out of office and I am trying to find out about full BIA status and the effect that has with 106.

Thanks,

Ruthann Caudill


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ruthie Caudill <ruthiejim13@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, May 2, 2018 at 12:38 AM
Subject: Full BIA for 106
To: Valerie Hauser <vhauser@achp.gov>, Ruthie Caudill <ruthiejim13@gmail.com>

Hi Valerie,

I have been talking with the Kanaka about full BIA.

It is like pulling teeth.

I am trying to explain the benefits (Conveyance, Forming own Government, Burial Protections, etc.)

I am having some success but am also hitting walls.

The Kanaka I think get full 106 with BIA on their Federal Crown Lands, Royal Patents Conveyance.

Can you please help me better understand?

Thanks,

Ruthann Caudill
***********************************
facebook post:


No comments: