(BIVN) – David Keanu Sai, Ph.D., acting as Chairman of the acting Council of Regency for the Hawaiian Kingdom, has filed a lawsuit against United States President Donald Trump regarding the prolonged American occupation of the Hawai‘ian Islands.
Sai, who will be speaking at a La Ho‘iho‘i Ea event in Kalapana this weekend, filed the lawsuit on June 25 in U.S. Federal District Court in Washington, D.C.
The suit comes on the heels of the February 25 memorandum written by Dr. Alfred M. deZayas – the United Nations Independent Expert under the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights – to members of the judiciary of the State of Hawai‘i advising the courts “should not lend themselves to a flagrant violation of the rights of the land title holders” and “must not enable or collude in the wrongful taking of private lands”, based on the understanding that Hawaii is a “sovereign nation-state in continuity” which is “under a strange form of occupation by the United States resulting from an illegal military occupation and fradulent annexation.”
The conclusion of Dr. deZayas is nothing new to followers of Sai’s work. He has been working at home and abroad to educate the world about the Hawai‘ian Kingdom. Last year, shortly after President Donald Trump took office, we interviewed Sai about a series of topics, including alleged “war crimes” as it relates to international law.
Video by David Corrigan, published Feb. 25, 2017.
Here is the detailed media release from the acting Council of Regency for the Hawaiian Kingdom about the Trump lawsuit, which also names Governor David Ige and U.S. Navy Admiral Philip Davidson as respondents, and lists a multitude of international presidents and prime ministers as nominal respondents:
HONOLULU, 17 July 2018 — On Monday morning, 25 June 2018, the Chairman of the acting Council of Regency for the Hawaiian Kingdom, H.E. David Keanu Sai, Ph.D., filed with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia a Petition for an Emergency Writ of Mandamus against President Donald John Trump. This Petition concerns the illegal and prolonged occupation of the Hawaiian Islands and the failure of the United States to administer the laws of the Hawaiian Kingdom as mandated under Article 43 of the 1907 Hague Convention, IV, Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land (36 Stat. 2199) and under Article 64 of the 1949 Geneva Convention, IV, Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War (6 U.S.T. 3516). The United States has ratified both treaties. The case has been assigned to Judge Tanya S. Chutkan under civil case no. 1:18-cv-01500.Under American rules of civil procedure, a petition for writ of mandamus is an administrative remedy that seeks to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any of its agencies to fulfill their official duties. It is not a complaint alleging certain facts to be true. The Hague and Geneva Conventions obligates the United States, as an occupying State, to administer the laws of the occupied State. There is no discretion on this duty to administer Hawaiian Kingdom law. This duty is mandated under international humanitarian law.Furthermore, according to the U.S. Constitution, treaties, such as the Hague and Geneva Conventions, are the supreme law of the land, and the United States is bound by them just as they are bound by the U.S. Constitution or any of the laws enacted by the Congress. Consequently, the failure of the United States to administer Hawaiian Kingdom laws has created a humanitarian crisis of unimaginable proportions where war crimes have and continue to be committed with impunity. War crimes have no statutes of limitation.The Petition mentions Iraq’s violation of international humanitarian law when it invaded Kuwait on 2 August 1990, and, like the United States, did not administer Kuwaiti law as mandated by the Hague and Geneva Conventions. This led to the formation of the United Nations Compensation Commission (UNCC) by the United Nations Security Council under resolution 687 (1991). The mandate of the UNCC was to process claims and pay compensation for losses or damages incurred as a direct result of Iraq’s unlawful invasion and occupation of Kuwait. In total, the UNCC awarded $52.4 billion dollars for an unlawful occupation that lasted seven months. If this formula is applied to the unlawful invasion and occupation of the Hawaiian Kingdom since 16 January 1893 that compensation amount would be staggering.This law suit comes on the heels of a memorandum, dated 25 February 2018, by the United Nations Independent Expert, Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, to the members of the judiciary of the State of Hawai‘i. The memo’s author, Dr. Alfred deZayas, who served as the Independent Expert until he retired on 30 April 2018, stated:“As a professor of international law, the former Secretary of the UN Human Rights Committee, co-author of book, The United Nations Human Rights Committee Case Law 1977-2008, and currently serving as the UN Independent Expert on the promotion of a democratic and equitable international order, I have come to understand that the lawful political status of the Hawaiian Islands is that of a sovereign nation-state in continuity; but a nation-state that is under a strange form of occupation by the United States resulting from an illegal military occupation and a fraudulent annexation. As such, international laws (the Hague and Geneva Conventions) require that governance and legal matters within the occupied of the Hawaiian Islands must be administered by the application of the laws of the occupied state (in this case, the Hawaiian Kingdom), not the domestic laws of the occupier (the United States).”In the Petition, the Hawaiian Kingdom begins with a preliminary statement concerning international proceedings held at the Permanent Court of Arbitration, The Hague, Netherlands.“When the South China Sea Tribunal cited in its award on jurisdiction the Larsen v. Hawaiian Kingdom case held at the Permanent Court of Arbitration (“PCA”), that should have garnered international attention, especially after the PCA acknowledged the Hawaiian Kingdom as an independent state and not the fiftieth State of the United States of America. The Larsen case was a dispute between a Hawaiian national and his government, who he claimed was negligent for allowing the unlawful imposition of American laws over Hawaiian territory that led to the alleged war crimes of unfair trial, unlawful confinement and pillaging.”Chairman Sai served as Agent for the Hawaiian government in Larsen v. Hawaiian Kingdom, PCA Case no. 1999-01. Before forming the ad hoc tribunal, the PCA acknowledged the Hawaiian Kingdom’s continued existence as an independent State and that the Hawaiian Kingdom would access the jurisdiction of the PCA as a non-Contracting Power pursuant to Article 47 of the 1907 Hague Convention for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes.Chairman Sai stated, “the United States, as an occupier, is mandated to administer Hawaiian Kingdom law over Hawaiian territory and not its own, until they withdraw. This is not a mere descriptive assumption by the occupying State, but rather it is the law of occupation. And this was precisely what the Larsen v. Hawaiian Kingdom arbitration was founded on—the unlawful imposition of American laws.” In 2001, Bederman and Hilbert reported in the American Journal of International Law:“At the center of the PCA proceedings was…that the Hawaiian Kingdom continues to exist and that the Hawaiian Council of Regency (representing the Hawaiian Kingdom) is legally responsible under international law for the protection of Hawaiian subjects, including the claimant. In other words, the Hawaiian Kingdom was legally obligated to protect Larsen from the United States’ “unlawful imposition [over him] of [its] municipal laws” through its political subdivision, the State of Hawaii. As a result of this responsibility, Larsen submitted, the Hawaiian Council of Regency should be liable for any international law violations that the United States had committed against him.”The Tribunal was comprised of three renowned international jurists, namely, Judge James Crawford, SC, current member of the International Court of Justice, Judge Christopher Greenwood, QC, former member of the International Court of Justice, and Dr. Gavan Griffith, former Australian Solicitor General.Larsen sought to have the Tribunal adjudge that the United States had violated his rights. He then sought the Tribunal to adjudge that the Hawaiian government was liable for those violations. Although the United States was formally invited, by the Hawaiian government, to join in the arbitration on 3 March 2000, it chose not to. The United States absence thus raised the indispensable third-party rule for Larsen to overcome. In its award (para. 7.4), however, the Tribunal acknowledged the Hawaiian Kingdom’s lawful political status since the nineteenth century.“[I]n the nineteenth century the Hawaiian Kingdom existed as an independent State recognized as such by the United States of America, the United Kingdom and various other States, including by exchanges of diplomatic or consular representatives and the conclusion of treaties.”After returning from oral hearings held at The Hague in December of 2000, the Council of Regency adopted a policy of education and exposure of the Hawaiian Kingdom’s lawful political status as an independent State. The Council made this decision to address the American policy of denationalization—Americanization that was implemented throughout the schools in the islands since 1906. Denationalization is a war crime. Within three generations, Americanization had effectively obliterated the national consciousness of the Hawaiian Kingdom in the minds of Hawai‘i’s people. This denationalization has resulted in a common misunderstanding that since President Barrack Obama was born in Hawai‘i, he was born within the United States. He was not. He was born in the Hawaiian Kingdom to an American mother and a Kenyan father. As such, he was born an American citizen by parentage—jus sanguinis, but not as a natural born citizen—jus soli.It would take 18 years of education and exposure to prompt the Hawaiian government to file the Petition for Emergency Writ of Mandamus. The Petition was filed with the Federal Court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §1331 (federal question jurisdiction), 28 U.S.C. §1651(a) (writ of mandamus), and 5 U.S.C. §702 (waiver of sovereign immunity). The Petition also names as nominal respondents twenty-eight countries that had diplomatic relations with the Hawaiian Kingdom to include treaties, and five international agencies. All of the respondents received a copy of the filed Petition, through the United States Postal Service, with a cover letter noting that a summons would be forthcoming.They include the United States, the Indo-Pacific Command, the State of Hawai‘i, Australia, Austria, the Bahamas, Belgium, Belize, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Cuba, France, Germany, Guatemala, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Peru, Portugal, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. Also included was the United Nations Secretary General, the President of the United Nations General Assembly, the President of the United Nations Security Council, the President of the United Nations Human Rights Committee, and the Chairman of the Permanent Court of Arbitration’s Administrative Council.In his letter to the United Nations Secretary General, Chairman Sai invoked the law of State responsibility. Chairman Sai stated:“As an internationally wrongful act, all States shall not ‘recognize as lawful a situation created by a serious breach within the meaning of Article 40, nor render aid or assistance in maintaining that situation (Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, 2001),’ Article 40 provides that a ‘breach of such an obligation is serious if it involves a gross or systemic failure by the responsible State to fulfill the obligation.’ By letter to United States President Donald John Trump dated 5 July 2018, the Hawaiian Kingdom gave notice of claim and invoked responsibility of the United States, in accordance with Article 43, for a serious breach of an obligation to comply with international humanitarian law.”Chairman Sai then made the following request to the Secretary General:“As a State not a member of the United Nations, but a member of the Universal Postal Union since 1882, being a specialized agency of the United Nations, I should be grateful if you would have this letter and the full text of its enclosures circulated as an official document of the General Assembly and of the Security Council.”The United States has been in an illegal state of war against the Hawaiian Kingdom since 1893On 9 March 1893, President Grover Cleveland, at the request of Queen Lili‘uokalani, conducted an investigation into the overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom government that occurred on 17 January 1893. Her Majesty notified the President that the overthrow of her government was committed by the United States diplomat assigned to the Hawaiian Kingdom, John Stevens, and by the unauthorized landing of United States armed forces.President Cleveland appointed James Blount, former Chairman of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, as Special Commissioner. Commissioner Blount arrived in Honolulu on 31 March 1893 and initiated his investigation the following day. After sending periodical reports to Secretary of State Walter Gresham in Washington, D.C., Blount completed his final report on 17 July 1893. On 18 October 1893, Gresham submitted his report to the President. Gresham concluded:“The Government of Hawaii surrendered its authority under a threat of war, until such time only as the Government of the United States, upon the facts being presented to it, should reinstate the constitutional sovereign… Should not the great wrong done to a feeble but independent State by an abuse of the authority of the United States be undone by restoring the legitimate government? Anything short of that will not, I respectfully submit, satisfy the demands of justice.”The following month, on 18 December 1893, President Grover Cleveland notified the Congress of the findings and conclusions of his investigation. President Cleveland stated:“And so it happened that on the 16th day of January, 1893, between four and five o’clock in the afternoon, a detachment of marines from the United States steamer Boston, with two pieces of artillery, landed at Honolulu. The men, upwards of 160 in all, were supplied with double cartridge belts filled with ammunition and with haversacks and canteens, and were accompanied by a hospital corps with stretchers and medical supplies. This military demonstration upon the soil of Honolulu was of itself an act of war, unless made either with the consent of the Government of Hawaii or for the bona fide purpose of protecting the imperiled lives and property of citizens of the United States. But there is no pretense of any such consent on the part of the Government of the Queen, which at the time was undisputed and was both the de facto and the de jure government. In point of fact the existing government instead of requesting the presence of an armed force protested against it.”The President concluded:“By an act of war, committed with the participation of a diplomatic representative of the United States and without authority of Congress, the Government of a feeble but friendly and confiding people has thus been overthrown. A substantial wrong has thus been done which a due regard for our national character as well as the rights of the injured people requires we should endeavor to repair.”When President Cleveland concluded that by an act of war committed against the Hawaiian Kingdom on 16 January 1893, which led to the unlawful overthrow of the Hawaiian government the following day, he acknowledged the situation under international law transformed from a state of peace to a state of war. Only by way of a treaty of peace could a state of war be transformed back to a state of peace. To explain this transformation, Chairman Sai, as Hawaiian Ambassador-at-large, authored a memorandum titled The Larsen v. Hawaiian Kingdom Case at the Permanent Court of Arbitration and Why There Is An Ongoing Illegal State of War with the United States of America Since 16 January 1893 (16 October 2017). This memorandum has been translated into Farsi, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Russian and Spanish.On the very same day the President notified the Congress of the illegal overthrow of the Hawaiian government, an agreement of restoration and peace was negotiated between the new U.S. diplomat assigned to the Hawaiian Kingdom, Albert Willis, and the Queen. Negotiations began on 13 November and lasted until 18 December 1893. However, due to political wrangling going on in the Congress, the President was unable to fulfill the United States’ obligation under the agreement of peace with the Queen. Five years later in 1898, the United States fraudulently annexed the Hawaiian Islands during the Spanish-American war and fortified it as a military outpost. Hawai‘i currently serves as headquarters for the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command.In 2013, the New York Times reported North Korea’s announcement that “all of its strategic rocket and long range artillery units ‘are assigned to strike bases of the U.S. imperialist aggressor troops in the U.S. mainland and on Hawaii.” The Hawaiian Kingdom’s existential threat has been heightened today by the rhetoric of U.S. President Donald Trump and North Korea’s Kim Jong-un.Instead of establishing a system to administer Hawaiian Kingdom law in 1893, the United States maintained their installed insurgency, calling itself the Provisional government, who, under the protection of U.S. troops, unlawfully seized control of the Hawaiian government apparatus. In 1894, these insurgents renamed themselves as the Republic of Hawai‘i. Six years later, the U.S. Congress changed that name to the Territory of Hawai‘i. And in 1959, Congress changed that name to the State of Hawai‘i. The U.S. Congress could no more establish a government in the Hawaiian Kingdom by enacting domestic statutes, than it could establish a government in Germany or in the United Kingdom.Since the United States’ admitted unlawful overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom government in 1893, there has been no lawful government in the Hawaiian Islands until the Hawaiian Council of Regency was established in 1995. The unlawful overthrow of the Hawaiian government 125 years ago, however, did not affect the continuity of the Hawaiian Kingdom as an independent State under international law. The Hawaiian Kingdom continued to remain in existence just as Iraq continued to exist despite its government being overthrown in 2003 by United States armed forces.
DISCUSSION:
The Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii/He Mokupuni Pae Aina o Hawaii/Ko Hawaii Pae Aina/ Hawaiian archipelago/Hawaiian Islands/Hawaii/Sandwich Islands
The Hawaiian Government existed since 1810 which was recognized as a Monarchy government.
Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli made the Hawaiian Government into a Constitutional Monarchy in 1840.
Three (3) parts of the Hawaiian Government exists:
(1) Sovereign - heirs and successors - Permanent part of government
(2) House of Nobles - heirs and successors - Permanent part of government
(3) House of Representatives - Temporary, voted in part of government
Note: The permanent parts of the Hawaiian Government made up of Kamehameha's heirs and successors has always existed.
The House of Representatives were made up of most of the usurpers who dethroned Queen Liliuokalani.
Permanent Treaty of Friendship and Amity ratified in 1850
Note:
Post Office Beginnings Left out from Sai's Brief:
The Postal Mailings appears in the 1849 Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation between the United States of America and the Kingdom Hawaii, Ratified and signed by Zachary Taylor, President of the United States of America, on February 4, 1850, and Ratified and signed by Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli in 1850.
See Article XV of the above Treaty regarding the Post Office.
"Article XV
So soon as Steam or other mail packets under the flag
of either of the contracting parties, shall have commenced
running between their respective ports of entry, the contracting parties agree to receive at the post offices of those ports all mailable matter, and to forward it as directed, the destination being to dome regular post office of either country, charging thereupon the regular postal rate as established by law in the territories of either party receiving
said mailable matter, in addition to the original postage of
the office whence the mail as sent. Mails for the United
States shall be made up at regular intervals at the Hawaiian Post Office, and dispatched to ports of the United
States, the postmasters at which ports shall open the
same, and forward the enclosed matter as directed, crediting
in the Hawaiian Government with their postages as established by law and stamped upon each manuscript or
printed sheet.
All mailable matter destined for the Hawaiian Islands
shall be received at the several post office in the United
States and forwarded to San Franclsco or other ports on
the Pacific coast of the United States, whence the post
masters shall despatch it by the regular mail packets to
Honolulu, the Hawaiian government agreeing on their part
to receive and collect for and credit the Post Office Department of the United State with the United States rates
charged thereupon. It shall be optional to prepay the postage on letters in either country, but postage on printed
sheets and newspapers shall in all cases be prepaid. The
respective post office department of the contracting parties shall in their accounts, which are to be justified annually, be credited with all dead letters returned."
See: https://www.hawaiiankingdom.org/treaty_us-1849.shtml
Reference for the ratification of the Treaty by Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli - Speech of 1851:
Protectorate over the Hawaiian Islands
The Hawaiian Government was under a three way protectorate as proclaimed by Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli in 1854:
PROCLAMATION.
Whereas, It has come to my knowledge from the highest official sources, that my Government has been recently threatened with overthrow by lawless violence; and whereas the representatives at my Court, of the United States, Great Britain and France, being cognizant of these threats, have offered me the prompt assistance of the Naval forces of their respective countries, I hereby publicly proclaim my acceptance of the aid thus proffered in support of my Sovereignty. My independence is more firmly established than ever before.
Keoni Ana.
Palace, 8th December, 1854.
By the King and Kuhina Nui.
Reference:
the Hawaiian Legislature, by Kamehameha IV
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net
Title: Speeches of His Majesty Kamehameha IV. To the Hawaiian Legislature
Author: Kamehameha IV
Release Date: August 31, 2008 [EBook #26501]
Language: English
Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 Protectorate for Hawaii in 1892 - prior to the Planned, Premeditated dethronement of Queen Liliuokalani in 1893:
SUMMARY
Sai is inaccurate about the U.S. at War with the Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii.
The parties to the treaties with the U.S. existed in 1850 and exists now because the Kamehameha descendants existed then and exists now.
The treaty of 1850 is a permanent friendship and amity treaty.
In 1854, Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli proclaimed that the United States, France, and Great Britain were protectorates.
In 1892, while Queen Liliuokalani was in place, a Protectorate for Hawaii was documented.
U.S. President Cleveland Gave Hawaii Back to Queen Liliuokalani in 1894 and 1897.
Legally, it was a done deal.
U.S. President Cleveland and the bankers developed the "Scarce Money Policy" introducing exhorbitant amounts of interest rates on Mortgages - 220%, Rail - 125%, etc. which appears to be the standard policy applied to citizens who became economic slaves.
Reference:
U.S. President William McKinley disregarded the Opposition to Annexation by Queen Liliuokalani and her 40,000 subjects (only 20,000 signatures to date found).
U.S. President William McKinley directed the Army, Navy, and Federal personnel to help develop the Territory of the United States/Territory of Hawaii.
U.S. President William McKinley's term showed that the United States became two (2) governments: The United States which operated with recognized nations who had treaties; and the American Empire which operated with territories, a lesser status than nations.
Reference: Peacock vs. Republic of Hawaii, HAWAIIAN REPORTS (1899), Supreme Court Law Library/Archives/Main Library, Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaii
U.S. President William McKinley "Proclaimed" Hawaii to be a Territory of the United States/Territory of Hawaii.
Congress and U.S. President William McKinley moved with recklessness and injustice.
Reference: Republic of Hawaii v. Edwards, HAWAIIAN REPORTS (1899), Supreme Court Law Library/Archives/Main Library, Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaii
A Legal Notice was sent to U.S. President Trump with an intense look at the history.
Reference: https://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/2019/06/hawaiian-kingdomkingdom-of-hawaii-legal.html
Remembering Kamehameha, a Birthday article with an intense look at our history:
Reference: https://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/2019/06/royal-tidings-no-2019-0611-royal.html
The planned, premeditated moves by the U.S., Great Britain is documented. This move is also called a piracy, pillaging, racketeering, fraud, conspiracy, etc. and could even be added to the documented False Flag operations as well.
As for the history being a War Crime, War, Conflicts....this is Genocide documented with moves against a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation which has documented treaties in place as well as Protectorates by the U.S., Great Britain, and France.
Sai is Not our Royal Families Representative and is self-appointed with a military/Psyops background who appeared on the Hawaiian issues from the time of the stolen Kaai - a funerary basketry containing our ancestors iwi/bones stolen from the Bishop Museum.
He has taken monies from many innocent kanaka maoli and has not returned it.
How do you have war crimes against a nation that was never at war?
The issues with the U.S., Great Britain are of utilizing monies, lands, etc. belonging to a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation whose people did no wrong.
The issues are based on bankrupt nations who funded Wars against the American people in the American Civil War 1863 - 1865.
The inappropriate funding of monies to support Wars in America due to support of slavery, etc. is what happened.
The U.S., and Great Britain became bankrupt and knew the status of the Hawaiian Kingdom with loads of gold, resources, land, etc. and became a target.
The Hawaiian Kingdom passed the anti-slavery law in 1852. Friend to Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli, et. als. was U.S. President Abraham Lincoln who was assassinated.
The U.S., Great Britain with the bankers/J.P. Morgan bankers, Bank of England developed the CFR/Council on Foreign Relations which planned the United Nations.
War it is not, but a Plundering Upon Innocents, Failure to follow the Rule of Law, and the U.S. Constitution, and the maintenance of treaties, and Protectorates.
Civilized operations and remedies are rents, including back rents, lands assumed without right are due back to our Hawaiian Kingdom, Royal Families, and all with alodio/alodial titles.
Peace among civilized nations are foremost, and all nations that have permanent, friendship treaties are still recognized by our Royal Families and kanaka maoli who did no wrong.
Although many democrats absolutely hate U.S. President Donald Trump, he does believe in Rule of Law, and the U.S. Constitution.
By the way, the military obtained most of the lands by fraud, deceit, treason, corruption by legal eagles/attorneys who were in collusion in harnessing the interests of our Royal Family members and assuming Private Properties and transferred through sales to the U.S. Government, etc.
So, the conflicts, genocide activities are based on the Trustees who connived, maneuvered, conspired against the Hawaiian Kingdom's private property owners, etc.
The issues are economic issues, the business of Wars being had with the documented assumption of assets, lands, water, minerals of a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation whose people did no wrong.
Military operatives love getting kanaka maoli to War....examples are Dr. Boyle, et. als.
aloha.
p.s. Conspiracies are documented.
References: https://he-mokupuni-pae-aina-o-hawaii.blogspot.com/2019/03/exposing-conspiracies-in-hawaii-since.html
References:
St. Thomas Law Review by Professor Boyle and Whistleblower ...
St. Thomas Law Review by Professor Boyle and Whistleblower's Leuren Moret, Aaron Ardaiz (dec.), and Amelia Gora's Comments on Professor Boyle ... These crimes by the ‘Agents’ and Dr. Boyle were of the “Federal Level” as well as “Local” since they were violations of the US Constitution which historically, to those of us in Native ...
U.S. Was a Protectorate over Hawaii - Legal Issues; A Last ...
Out of the Archives - Honolulu: U.S. Was a Protectorate over Hawaii (which means there are legal issues about our lands on the international level, etc.) and There was a Last Treaty made with U.S. President Grover Cleveland...but Where is it?Royal Tidings: Rule of Law Fail: Protectorate over the ...
May 04, 2019 · Researched by Amelia Gora (2019) New-York tribune. (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, December 28, 1872, Page 4, Image 4 ... This is documented Rule of Law Fail because the United States, France, and Great Britain are Protectorates over Hawaii/Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii/Sandwich Islands.Hawaiian Kingdom: Exposing Conspiracies In Hawaii Since ...
Mar 23, 2019 · Researched by Amelia Gora (2019) ... France and Great Britain are also on record as having a Protectorate over Hawaii. A Created, Fraudulent Entity Created by Proclamation With the Proclamation made by the U.S. President McKinley in 1898 based on a fraud annexation, U.S. President McKinley had declared that the Territory was a created Territory ...Images of protectorates over hawaii by amelia gora
bing.com/imagesTribunal Affairs: Special Legal Notice - Protectorates ...
Hawaiian Kingdom No. 2015 - 1008 Protectorate Nations Pending; Royal Families Land Assignments for Kanaka Maoli, etc. from Amelia Gora, Royal Person, Royal Family Member, One of Kamehameha III - Kauikeaouli's Heirs and Successor, Judicial Tribunal Member, Land Owner, Title Owner, Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, House of Nobles Member, Konohiki, Hawaiian Genealogical Society RepresentativePremeditation to Take Over Hawaii By the United States
Premeditation to Take Over Hawaii By the United States ITATION EVIDENCE compiled by Amelia Gora.....aloha. Posted by Amelia Gora on May 25, 2012 at 2:00am in Politics; View DiscussionsAmelia Gora-Kanaka Maoli Truth : Remembering the Criminal ...
Jan 17, 2018 · Remembering the Criminal Dethronement of Queen Liliuokalani - 125 Years Ago or The Kingdom of Hawaii Exists ... * Premeditation to take over Queen Liliuokalani and the Kingdom of Hawaii is documented. ... Reply by Amelia Gora: Kingdom of Hawaii/Hawaiian Kingdom Legal Notice No. 2017-1214: Opposition to Rat Poisons dropped on Waianae, etc ...Diary: PIRATES IN THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS - MORE EVIDENCE ...
Jul 06, 2011 · The entity State of Hawaii FAILS to Protect the Lives, Safety of all of their own citizens, and all visitors, foreigners, including all Hawaiian Nationals, Hawaiian subjects, sovereigns, Hawaiian ...Hawaiian Genealogies References: Kamehameha Descendants ...
Mar 14, 2015 · Report prepared by Amelia Kuulei Gora, one of Kamehameha’s descendants, a Royal Person, not subject to the Laws, OPPOSING WARS, maintaining the claims of all of Kamehameha’s descendants as one of the Representatives of the Hawaiian Genealogy Society affiliated with the Kingdom of Hawaii –Neutral status. Dated: March 11, 2003.Bernice Pauahi Bishop's Documented "Next of Kin": Kalola ...
Dec 14, 2014 · Bernice Pauahi Bishop's Documented "Next of Kin": Kalola (w) and Her Family or Kuini Liliha's Family or The True Families of Bernice Pauahi Bishop, Not the Treasonous, Conspirators, Pirates, Pillagers Claiming to be the Trustees of an Illegal, Fraudulent Trust Supported by the U.S.Annexation - he-mokupuni-pae-aina-o-hawaii.blogspot.com
Mar 08, 2018 · Darkness over Hawaii: ... Bishop Estates/ Kamehameha Schools Guilty of Fraud, Conspiracy, Piracy, etc. Legal news from the offices of Amelia Gora, a Royal person, Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, House of Nobles Member, Judicial Tribunal Judge, one of the four (4) Judges elected by the Sovereigns heirs and successors and the House of Nobles ...You also looked at these sites
Only you can see this-
https://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/2019/03/us-was-protectorate-over-hawaii-legal.html · Jun 05, 2019
-
https://he-mokupuni-pae-aina-o-hawaii.blogspot.com/2018/03/annexation-sham-set-uplegally-no.html · Jun 05, 2019
-
https://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/2018/11/in-land-of-poi-treason-by-charles-reed.html · Jun 05, 2019
-
References:
Kamehameha’s Descendants, His 20 Moopuna/Grandchildren
Documented Today
| Kamehameha I | |
|---|---|
 |
by Amelia Gora, one of Kamehameha’s descendants (2013 updated 2017)
The following are Kamehameha’s grandchildren found in research:
Children of son Pauli Kaoleioku/Kaoleioku:
1) Pauahi – Ruth Keelikolani’s mother
2) Konia – the true Bernice Pauahi’s mother
3) Hanuna (k) – Kapule(k); Kini (w); Poohina (w); and Hookahe’s 
father
father
4) Keola (k) – research incomplete
Children of Kalanihelemaiiluna Paki:
5) Abner Paki
6) Kalaniulumoku
Child of Kanekapolei (w):
7) Kikau
Child of Kahiwa Kanekapolei (w):
8) Kepilino
Children of Maulili:
9) Kahue
10) Pohihi
Names found recently under the “moopuna” of Kamehameha:
11) Keawe
12) Mahoe
13) Kekipi
14) Nalimu/Kailakanoa
15) Kahalaoa
16) Opunui
17) Papa
Children of Kanakaole/Keliikanakaole (k)
18) John Kapena
19) Sam Kapena
20) Umiokalani
Not listed
Children of Keliiokahekili
There are 20 of Kamehameha’s grandchildren documented today. Research remains incomplete.
Conclusion
The ramifications of finding/documenting the above is that Abercrombie, Lingle, Ige, Governors, the Courts, the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates/Kamehameha Schools Trustees, OHA/Office of Hawaiian Affairs Trustees, etc. should not be too eager in claiming what is not theirs.
The descendants/ heirs of all listed above are the true land owners, true Title owners of the Crown Lands, the Alii Nui lands, etc. and all are directed to sue the Title Companies, the Banks, the State of Hawaii, etc. to recoup monies paid to occupiers, etc.
The above are part of the Royal Families, and Royal Families are not subject to the laws.
The above are also protected by the Treaty of 1850, International Laws through the Minister of Foreign Relations/Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs/Relations/Department as accorded in the Landais Case and the Flanchet Case(s) documented in the Supreme Court Law Books, Volumes I, and Volume II.
Treaties supersedes State laws, etc. The Treaty of 1849 applies only to Kamehameha’s family(ies) including Kamehameha III’s families, and his descendants are part of the grandchildren listed above.
The Treaty of 1849 locks in the U.S. Constitution of 1849 also. 30 States are locked in to the U.S. Constitution of 1849.
Queen Liliuokalani was given Hawaii Back by U.S. President Cleveland twice (2x).
1894
U.S. President Cleveland Gave Hawaii back to Queen Liliuokalani:
“When Mr. Willis started he (U.S. President Cleveland) gave him two letters. One was addressed to Dole, President of the Provisional Government, in which he addressed Dole as “Great and good friend,” and at the close, being a devout Christian, he asked “God to take care of Dole.” This was the first letter. The letter of one President to another; of one friend to another. The second letter was addressed to Mr. Willis, in which Mr. Willis was told to upset Dole at the first opportunity and put the deposed Queen back on her throne. This may be diplomacy, but it is no kin to honesty.”
Reference:
—The Inter-Ocean, Chicago, February 2, 1894. Author: Orator, Lawyer Robert Ingersoll
1897
U.S. President Cleveland Again Gave Hawaii back to Queen Liliuokalani.
see: President Cleveland Gave Hawaii Back to Queen Liliuokalani https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B6Gs4av5Se1wN2JkZjMxMzEtMDIyNi00YW…
The non- annexed (No Treaty of Annexation) State of Hawaii, OHA/Office of Hawaiian Affairs, Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates Trustees/Kamehameha Schools, etc. are truly Not the land owners, not the Title owners in the Hawaiian Islands, the Hawaiian archipelago.
Cease and Desist.
Rents and Lease are due/overdue, etc.
The U.S. government needs to take back their Pirates under International laws.
This posting is made so that the whole world can see that the true land owners, the true Title owners, etc. are here, were here at the time of the wrongful dethronement of Queen Liliuokalani in 1893, and we are peoples of genocide activities by belligerent, aggressive occupiers who have done wrong to our people over time through genocide, rape of our environment, mucking up our lands, water, etc.
This posting documents the facts that we are surrounded by Pirates occupying our neutral, friendly, non-violent nation.
The criminal occupation has affected our ancestors and our families over time and we continue to be surrounded by Pirates who have continued their lawless approach on a neutral nation whose gold, resources have been a gain to bankrupt nations namely the U.S., England supported by the J.P. Morgan bankers, the Bank of England, etc.
Rents and leases are due to the true land owners, the true Title owners who exists today, descendants of those who existed in 1884 (the death of Bernice Pauahi Bishop, etc.), etc.
No Rail. No GMO’s. No Depleted Uranium, No weaponry in a neutral non violent nation, No mucking up of lands, waters, seas, waterways, etc.
All of the above are true, correct to the best of my research, best of my knowledge.
aloha.
Reference:
Contact e-mail: theiolani@gmail.com
Contact address: P.O. Box 861781, Wahiawa, Oahu, Hawaii 96786
United States Financial Policy Forces Men to do Business on Credit...example: Rail 129%, Mortgages 220%, etc.
https://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/2019/05/banking-racket-confiscating-properties.html
U.S. Government and Banking Racket: Confiscating Properties Through Foreclosures For Failing to Pay off the Mortages
Appears that the intent of the U.S. Government and the Bankers is that most of the people will be sucked into buying homes, owe mortgages with an excessive amount of interest and the people are not expected to follow through and complete the payments, resulting in foreclosures, and bankruptcy.
See the following article for examples of the percentages charged:
United States Financial Policy Forces Men to do Business on Credit...example: Rail 129%, Mortgages 220%, etc.
OBSERVATIONS AND COMMENTARIES:
by Amelia Gora (2019)
Note that this policy was utilized by U.S. President Cleveland's time. It appears that this policy has also been utilized by other Presidents over time.
The interest rates, however, does not remain the same.
The U.S. Government and Bankers are certainly making monies off of the Rail, the Mortgages, Loans, etc.
The expenditures for the purposes of Businesses for War is another area that many are making monies from.
The American people are the fall guys from their loans, credit, and also become victims for their support of a system that cares little for their soldiers whose lives are not valued as persons, but just and expendable piece of meat to plunder upon others with the goal of obtaining wealth, etc.
A wicked racket with disregard for human life generally.
That is the democracy way of life.
It appears the policies of the Royal government from the Hawaiian Kingdom, a Constitutional Monarchy form of government has a more honest, direct approach to taking care of it's people/ subjects.
Although the alodio system is locked in, anyone marrying into the land owners and have children will continue to own the lands, have less monies owed to bankers, etc.
Also, in a neutral, non-violent, friendly nation, and treaties in hand means no lives lost through wars and so contrary to the United States and the Bankers Businesses of War, Plundering, Racketeering, etc.
aloha.
**************************
United States Financial Policy Forces Men to do Business on Credit...example: Rail 129%, Mortgages 220%, etc.
1896
https://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/2019/05/president-roosevelts-period-showing.htmlPresident Roosevelt's Period Showing the Scarce Money Policy of 1896 - President Cleveland's Time
1897
https://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/2019/05/scarce-money-policy-and-existing-gold.html
Scarce Money Policy and the "existing gold Standard" Policy
Reference:
Kamehameha’s Descendants, His 20 Moopuna/Grandchildren
Documented Today
| Kamehameha I | |
|---|---|
|
by Amelia Gora, one of Kamehameha’s descendants (2013 updated 2017)
The following are Kamehameha’s grandchildren found in research:
Children of son Pauli Kaoleioku/Kaoleioku:
1) Pauahi – Ruth Keelikolani’s mother
2) Konia – the true Bernice Pauahi’s mother
3) Hanuna (k) – Kapule(k); Kini (w); Poohina (w); and Hookahe’s father
father
4) Keola (k) – research incomplete
Children of Kalanihelemaiiluna Paki:
5) Abner Paki
6) Kalaniulumoku
Child of Kanekapolei (w):
7) Kikau
Child of Kahiwa Kanekapolei (w):
8) Kepilino
Children of Maulili:
9) Kahue
10) Pohihi
Names found recently under the “moopuna” of Kamehameha:
11) Keawe
12) Mahoe
13) Kekipi
14) Nalimu/Kailakanoa
15) Kahalaoa
16) Opunui
17) Papa
Children of Kanakaole/Keliikanakaole (k)
18) John Kapena
19) Sam Kapena
20) Umiokalani
Not listed
Children of Keliiokahekili
There are 20 of Kamehameha’s grandchildren documented today. Research remains incomplete.
Conclusion
The ramifications of finding/documenting the above is that Abercrombie, Lingle, Ige, Governors, the Courts, the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates/Kamehameha Schools Trustees, OHA/Office of Hawaiian Affairs Trustees, etc. should not be too eager in claiming what is not theirs.
The descendants/ heirs of all listed above are the true land owners, true Title owners of the Crown Lands, the Alii Nui lands, etc. and all are directed to sue the Title Companies, the Banks, the State of Hawaii, etc. to recoup monies paid to occupiers, etc.
The above are part of the Royal Families, and Royal Families are not subject to the laws.
The above are also protected by the Treaty of 1850, International Laws through the Minister of Foreign Relations/Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs/Relations/Department as accorded in the Landais Case and the Flanchet Case(s) documented in the Supreme Court Law Books, Volumes I, and Volume II.
Treaties supersedes State laws, etc. The Treaty of 1849 applies only to Kamehameha’s family(ies) including Kamehameha III’s families, and his descendants are part of the grandchildren listed above.
The Treaty of 1849 locks in the U.S. Constitution of 1849 also. 30 States are locked in to the U.S. Constitution of 1849.
Queen Liliuokalani was given Hawaii Back by U.S. President Cleveland twice (2x).
1894
U.S. President Cleveland Gave Hawaii back to Queen Liliuokalani:
“When Mr. Willis started he (U.S. President Cleveland) gave him two letters. One was addressed to Dole, President of the Provisional Government, in which he addressed Dole as “Great and good friend,” and at the close, being a devout Christian, he asked “God to take care of Dole.” This was the first letter. The letter of one President to another; of one friend to another. The second letter was addressed to Mr. Willis, in which Mr. Willis was told to upset Dole at the first opportunity and put the deposed Queen back on her throne. This may be diplomacy, but it is no kin to honesty.”
Reference:
—The Inter-Ocean, Chicago, February 2, 1894. Author: Orator, Lawyer Robert Ingersoll
1897
U.S. President Cleveland Again Gave Hawaii back to Queen Liliuokalani.
see: President Cleveland Gave Hawaii Back to Queen Liliuokalani https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B6Gs4av5Se1wN2JkZjMxMzEtMDIyNi00YW…
The non- annexed (No Treaty of Annexation) State of Hawaii, OHA/Office of Hawaiian Affairs, Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates Trustees/Kamehameha Schools, etc. are truly Not the land owners, not the Title owners in the Hawaiian Islands, the Hawaiian archipelago.
Cease and Desist.
Rents and Lease are due/overdue, etc.
The U.S. government needs to take back their Pirates under International laws.
This posting is made so that the whole world can see that the true land owners, the true Title owners, etc. are here, were here at the time of the wrongful dethronement of Queen Liliuokalani in 1893, and we are peoples of genocide activities by belligerent, aggressive occupiers who have done wrong to our people over time through genocide, rape of our environment, mucking up our lands, water, etc.
This posting documents the facts that we are surrounded by Pirates occupying our neutral, friendly, non-violent nation.
The criminal occupation has affected our ancestors and our families over time and we continue to be surrounded by Pirates who have continued their lawless approach on a neutral nation whose gold, resources have been a gain to bankrupt nations namely the U.S., England supported by the J.P. Morgan bankers, the Bank of England, etc.
Rents and leases are due to the true land owners, the true Title owners who exists today, descendants of those who existed in 1884 (the death of Bernice Pauahi Bishop, etc.), etc.
No Rail. No GMO’s. No Depleted Uranium, No weaponry in a neutral non violent nation, No mucking up of lands, waters, seas, waterways, etc.
All of the above are true, correct to the best of my research, best of my knowledge.
aloha.
Reference:
Contact e-mail: theiolani@gmail.com
Contact address: P.O. Box 861781, Wahiawa, Oahu, Hawaii 96786
Reference: https://he-mokupuni-pae-aina-o-hawaii.blogspot.com/
*************************
see also: https://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/2019/06/treaties-plus-protectorates-does-not.html
****************
facebook:
No comments:
Post a Comment