Hi Thomas,
Joyclynn has not sent me her e-mail yet..............she is on Facebook though, and I'll post her once again.
As for Paulo Fujishiro...........our ancestor is John Kapena the Konohiki of Ukumehame and in the land docs there is a conflict that occurred with our ancestor and the Kamakakehau families and it is documented that our ancestor is the Konohiki of the area.
I am John Kapena's descendant from two (2) of his children: Keawe and Kekualoa (female).
We have ohana living on Maui a short distance from there.............
Just letting everyone know that we are here............cousin John Castro lives on Maui, he's also a descendant of John Kapena through Keawe, and Kekualoa (female)
John Kapena had son Keawe who had son David Keawe aka's who had Mele Keawe and who had Mary Kauweloa and who had Albert Castro/Sonny Castro(and siblings) who had John Castro and siblings.
John Kapena had daughter Kekualoa who had son Opunui who had Kapehe opio/Kapopo who married David Keawe aka's and had Mele Keawe and who had Mary Kauweloa and who had Albert Castro/Sonny Castro(and siblings) who had John Castro and siblings.
aloha.
p.s.. our Families remain the Konohiki........we are descendants of Kalaniopuu in 4 lines, Kamehameha in 4 lines, Kaumualii in 2 lines, John Kapena in 2 lines..etc...
this is the thread that Joycelynn posted which I shared to kanaka maoli/kanaka Hawaii maoli recently:
Sunday, April 22, 2018
Vol VI No. 699 Part 1aa - So Very IMPORTANT: "The Doctrine of Political Question" found within Separation of Powers Applies to All kanaka maoli/kanaka Hawaii maoli persons, lands, mineral rights, waters, etc.
Saturday, April 14, 2018
Updated: "The Doctrine of Political Question" Applies to All Land Cases.....Important, Mahalo Joyclynn Costa!
11 years ago on April 13th on a Friday myself and 3 others stood in front a Judge. We were accused of Criminal Trespass II reduced to Simple Trespass. The day we got arrested they put it on the 10 news about activist fighting for "Hawaiian" land. Wrong, we were standing for our rights and kuleana. After being looped in the system for months we had our day in court. The Prosecutor said if we could prove separation of jurisdiction and powers from both the State of Hawaii a...nd the United States the Judge could recognize our claim. Our point was they could not apply their authority on Hawaiian Nationals. There were 16 arrested that day. On April 13 on a Friday I delivered what the prosecutor requested. I handed the clerk, to hand to the Judge, a letter from the late Senator Inouye. He was a United State Senator for the State of Hawaii. (two birds w/ one stone) He could not come to our trial due to a mandated Constitutional Separation of Powers. I looked it up and found within the Separation of Powers was "The Doctrine of Political Question". In this doctrine it speaks of land if created by another Country can not be decided in court. It is of a political matter between the Executives. The Judge took a look at the letter asked a few questions flipped thru his books and accepted my oral motion to dismiss with prejudice. The prosecutor had nothing else to rebut and the Judge rendered a decision to grant the Dismissal with Prejudice. I know this was not of my doing but the grace of ke Akua that worked this case. You see we were not suppose to appear that because the case was already dismissed w/out prejudice. The Judge asked why our names were on the calendar and all they could say was it was a mistake. My dad stood with me and he had his say in court. A week later all others were also dismissed w/prejudice. All 16!!!! Since then we have lost a few of those warriors. This post is dedicated to them. I miss you Bradah Lonohiwa Kekahuna.
See More
See More
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 5:37 AM, Thomas Lenchanko <tlenchanko1@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
*****************************************************
aloha…AmeliaWould you forward my email address to Joyclynn with regard to konohiki Paulo “Pops” Kamakakehau Fujishiro, his Ukumehame Maui property and the political question doctrine.Thank you
*****************************************************
‘Treason is hereby deemed to be any plotting or attempt to dethrone or destroy the King, or the levying of war against the King's government, or the adhering to the enemies thereof, giving them aid and comfort, the same being done by a person owing allegiance to this kingdom.’ [Penal Codes of the Hawaiian Islands (1869), Article VI. Treason, Section 1.]
2. According to the Constitution and laws of the Hawaiian Islands, any actions done by the Provisional Government are ‘null and void’:
a. ‘All laws now in force in this Kingdom, shall continue and remain in full effect, until altered or repealed by the Legislature; such parts only excepted as are repugnant to this Constitution. All laws heretofore enacted or that may hereafter be enacted, which are contrary to this Constitution, shall be null and void.’ Article 79. Constitution of the Hawaiian Kingdom (1887)
b. The acts that were ‘contrary’ to the Constitution include:
1. ‘The Government of this Kingdom is that of a Constitutional Monarchy, under His Majesty Kalakaua, His Heirs and Successors’ Article 21. Constitution of the Hawaiian Islands. (1887, 1864)
2. ‘The person of the King is inviolable and sacred. His Ministers are responsible. To the King and the Cabinet belongs the Executive power. All laws that have passed the Legislature, shall require His Majesty's signature in order to their validity, except as provided in Article 48.’ Article 31, Constitution of the Hawaiian Islands. (1887, 1864)
c. The Acts of the Provisional Government are clearly ‘in contravention of a prohibitory law, namely by committing ‘Treason’[20] :
‘Whatever is done in contravention of a prohibitory law is void, although the nullity be not formally directed. The Civil Codes of the Hawaiian Islands (1859), Chapter II OF THE EFFECTS OF LAWS SECTION.8
Officials of the state of Hawaii continue to perpetuate ‘Fraud’[21] .
More often than not when a Hawaiian is confronted with violations of state of Hawaii laws, officials of the state of Hawaii will use a circular boilerplate defense related to its claims it has jurisdiction over Hawaiians, such as “The lack of subject matter jurisdiction is equally specious this court would have to find not only the Kingdom of Hawaii exists but the state of Hawaii does not”.
On November 25, 1892 the Hawaiian Kingdom Government with the approval of Queen Liliuokalani effectively locked the door and threw away the key to the sovereignty of the Hawaiian Kingdom and its ‘the Hawaiian Constitution or laws, or fixed by Hawaiian judicial precedent, or established by Hawaiian national usage’[22] , as of January 1, 1893 when this law took effect. This action was a well thought out strategy based on the ‘Historical Truths, Details of the Conspiracy that led to the overthrow of the Monarchy’ [23]
The facts are clear, the state of Hawaii was a creation of the Republic of Hawaii, it holds no sovereignty in the Hawaiian Islands, once you share the facts with those officials they become liable for perpetuating criminal ‘fraud’. [24]
2. According to the Constitution and laws of the Hawaiian Islands, any actions done by the Provisional Government are ‘null and void’:
a. ‘All laws now in force in this Kingdom, shall continue and remain in full effect, until altered or repealed by the Legislature; such parts only excepted as are repugnant to this Constitution. All laws heretofore enacted or that may hereafter be enacted, which are contrary to this Constitution, shall be null and void.’ Article 79. Constitution of the Hawaiian Kingdom (1887)
b. The acts that were ‘contrary’ to the Constitution include:
1. ‘The Government of this Kingdom is that of a Constitutional Monarchy, under His Majesty Kalakaua, His Heirs and Successors’ Article 21. Constitution of the Hawaiian Islands. (1887, 1864)
2. ‘The person of the King is inviolable and sacred. His Ministers are responsible. To the King and the Cabinet belongs the Executive power. All laws that have passed the Legislature, shall require His Majesty's signature in order to their validity, except as provided in Article 48.’ Article 31, Constitution of the Hawaiian Islands. (1887, 1864)
c. The Acts of the Provisional Government are clearly ‘in contravention of a prohibitory law, namely by committing ‘Treason’[20] :
‘Whatever is done in contravention of a prohibitory law is void, although the nullity be not formally directed. The Civil Codes of the Hawaiian Islands (1859), Chapter II OF THE EFFECTS OF LAWS SECTION.8
Officials of the state of Hawaii continue to perpetuate ‘Fraud’[21] .
More often than not when a Hawaiian is confronted with violations of state of Hawaii laws, officials of the state of Hawaii will use a circular boilerplate defense related to its claims it has jurisdiction over Hawaiians, such as “The lack of subject matter jurisdiction is equally specious this court would have to find not only the Kingdom of Hawaii exists but the state of Hawaii does not”.
On November 25, 1892 the Hawaiian Kingdom Government with the approval of Queen Liliuokalani effectively locked the door and threw away the key to the sovereignty of the Hawaiian Kingdom and its ‘the Hawaiian Constitution or laws, or fixed by Hawaiian judicial precedent, or established by Hawaiian national usage’[22] , as of January 1, 1893 when this law took effect. This action was a well thought out strategy based on the ‘Historical Truths, Details of the Conspiracy that led to the overthrow of the Monarchy’ [23]
The facts are clear, the state of Hawaii was a creation of the Republic of Hawaii, it holds no sovereignty in the Hawaiian Islands, once you share the facts with those officials they become liable for perpetuating criminal ‘fraud’. [24]
No comments:
Post a Comment