Translate

Sunday, September 25, 2016

Important Information - The Story of a Crime, Cleveland Gave Hawaii Back etc.

New York Times - The Learning Network Perpetuates and Promotes Erroneous Hawaiian History

January 17, 2012, 4:01 am

Jan. 17, 1893 | Hawaiian Monarchy Overthrown by America-Backed Businessmen

By THE LEARNING NETWORK
 Queen Liliuokalani, the last monarch of the Kingdom of Hawaii, is shown in this uncredited portrait taken around 1890.
Historic Headlines
Learn about key events in history and their connections to today.
On Jan. 17, 1893, Hawaii’s monarchy was overthrown when a group of businessmen and sugar planters forced Queen Liliuokalani to abdicate. The coup led to the dissolving of the Kingdom of Hawaii two years later, its annexation as a U.S. territory and eventual admission as the 50th state in the union.
The first European contact with Hawaii was made in 1778 by Capt. James Cook. In the 19th century, traders and missionaries came to the islands from Europe and the United States. They often opposed the Hawaiian monarchy, favoring instead a British-style constitutional monarchy where the monarch held little power.
In 1874, David Kalakaua became king and sought to reduce the power of the white Missionary Party (later Reform Party) in the government. In 1887, angered by King Kalakaua’s extravagant spending and his attempts to dilute their power, a small group of Missionary Party members, known as the Hawaiian League, struck back against the king.

Led by Lorrin A. Thurston and Sanford B. Dole, the Hawaiian League drafted a new constitution that reduced the power of the king and increased the power of the cabinet and Legislature. It also extended voting rights to wealthy noncitizens, while excluding Asians and restricting access for native Hawaiians through land-owning and literacy provisions. Backed by a militia, the group used the threat of violence to force King Kalakaua to sign the constitution, which became known as the Bayonet Constitution.
King Kalakaua died in 1891 and was succeeded by his sister, Liliuokalani, who proposed a new constitution that would restore powers of the monarchy and extend voting rights for native Hawaiians. The queen’s actions angered many of Hawaii’s white businessmen, who formed a 13-member Committee of Safety with the goal of overthrowing the monarchy and seeking annexation by the United States.
The Jan. 29, 1893 edition of The New York Times recounted the events of the coup. On Jan. 16, Hawaiian Marshal Charles B. Wilson attempted to arrest the committee members and declare martial law, but his attempts were turned down by other government officials who feared violence. The next day, after a police officer was shot and wounded trying to halt the distribution of weapons to the Committee of Safety’s militia, the committee decided to put its coup into action. Near the queen’s ʻIolani Palace in Honolulu, the committee’s militia gathered and were joined by 162 U.S. Marines and Navy sailors who were ordered by John L. Stevens, U.S. Minister to Hawaii, to protect the committee. The queen surrendered peacefully to avoid violence.
The Committee of Safety established a provisional government headed by Mr. Dole. U.S. President Grover Cleveland opposed the provisional government and called for the queen to be restored to power, but the Committee of Safety established the Republic of Hawaii and refused to cede power. In 1895, Hawaiian royalists began a coup against the republic, but it did not succeed. Queen Liliuokalani was arrested for her alleged role in the coup and convicted of treason; while under house arrest, the queen agreed to formally abdicate and dissolve the monarchy.
In 1898, the United States annexed Hawaii. Hawaii was administered as a U.S. territory until 1959, when it became the 50th state.
Connect to Today:
In 1993, Congress issued an apology to the people of Hawaii for the U.S. government’s role in the overthrow and acknowledged that “the native Hawaiian people never directly relinquished to the United States their claims to their inherent sovereignty.” And, since 2000, Senator Daniel K. Akaka of Hawaii, who is soon to retire, has repeatedly proposed to Congress the Native Hawaiian Government Reorganization Act, also known as the Akaka Bill, which would extend sovereignty to 400,000 native Hawaiians.
In 2005, The Times described the bill: “The measure would give [Native Hawaiians] equivalent legal standing to American Indians and native Alaskans and lead to the creation of a governing body that would make decisions on [their] behalf … The governing body would also have the power to negotiate with federal and state authorities over the disposition of vast amounts of land and resources taken by the United States when the islands were annexed in 1898.”
Supporters say the bill is necessary to protect native culture and redress Hawaiians for past injustices. Opponents say the bill is unworkable and would create a racially divided state.
What are your thoughts on legislation that gives native Hawaiians more control over the land, culture and resources of the islands? Given your understanding of history, would you support or oppose a bill that grants more autonomy to native Hawaiians? Why?
This post has been revised to reflect the following correction:
Correction: January 17, 2012
An earlier version of this post read "The next day, after a police officer was killed trying to halt the distribution of weapons to the Committee of Safety’s militia, the committee decided to put its coup into action. Near the queen’s ʻIolani Palace in Honolulu, the committee’s militia gathered and were joined by about 300 U.S. Marines and Navy sailors who were ordered by John L. Stevens, U.S. Minister to Hawaii, to protect the committee."
The police officer was shot and wounded, not killed. Though the Times article from Jan. 29, 1893, reported the number of U.S. Marines and sailors at around 300, the official number given by U.S. government investigations is 162. The post has been amended to reflect those changes.
Historic Headlines, Hawaii, monarchy, power, states, U.S. Constitution, U.S. History

Related Posts

From The Learning Network

17 Comments

  1. 1. January 17, 2012 6:57 am Link
    Thank you for your excellent piece on the 1893 overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy. You asked how readers feel about the Akaka Bill that aims to give autonomy to Native Hawaiians.
    In Hawaii the Akaka Bill is opposed by a few white apologists for the American-sponsored overthrow and subsequent annexation–and by many Native Hawaiians who feel it’s not a reasonable alternative to the national independence that was wrongfully taken away and either (a) continues to exist in law, needing only to be lived out, or (b) must someday be restored.
    The argument for the Akaka Bill, also held by many Native Hawaiians, is that Hawaii today is clearly a part of the USA, with a huge American military presence, and that for the United States to recognize Native Hawaiians as something like American Indians is better than nothing and may have practical advantages.
    I’m an American who has lived most of his life in Hawaii. My wife and I are raising a Native Hawaiian son. My pro-Hawaiian bias will be obvious. I respect Senator Akaka and have voted for him at each opportunity. It’s hard for me to support or oppose the Akaka Bill.
    — John Swindle
  2. 2. January 17, 2012 11:08 am Link
    i think wate we did was rong but now it is a state now so it over
    — nick
  3. 3. January 17, 2012 12:41 pm Link
    Unfortunately this “learning network” article is delivering factual falsehoods and lousy interpretation to the readers.
    Here are a few errors of fact:
    FALSE “The coup led to the dissolving of the Kingdom of Hawaii two years later”
    TRUE: A revolutionary Provisional Government was put in place immediately, and given de facto recognition within 2 days by the local consuls of every nation with a consulate in Honolulu. Following a Constitutional Convention and election, the Republic of Hawaii was created in July 1894. Emperors, Kings, Queens, and Presidents of 20 nations on 4 continents personally signed letters in 11 languages giving full-fledged recognition de jure to the Republic as the rightful government. Photos of those letters are at
    http://tinyurl.com/4wtwdz
    Hawaii remained an independent nation for 4 more years. Hawaii offered a Treaty of Annexation in 1897 and the U.S. accepted the Treaty in 1898.
    MISLEADING HALF-TRUTH: [The Bayonet Constitution of 1887] “extended voting rights to wealthy noncitizens, while excluding Asians and restricting access for native Hawaiians through land-owning and literacy provisions.”
    FULL TRUTH: Noncitizens who owned property and/or held high positions in the government had were given “denization” papers and had voting rights long before 1887; and there were already property/income requirements for voting established under the previous Constitution of 1864, which had been unilaterally proclaimed by King Lot Kamehameha V after he failed to get it approved by the legislature.
    FALSE: “a police officer was killed trying to halt the distribution of weapons to the Committee of Safety’s militia”
    TRUE: The police officer was shot in the shoulder, went to hospital, and made a speedy recovery. He was visited in hospital the next day by President Dole and other leaders of the revolution, who gave him their well-wishes.
    NASTY FALSEHOOD: “joined by about 300 U.S. Marines and Navy sailors who were ordered by John L. Stevens, U.S. Minister to Hawaii, to protect the committee.”
    TRUE: There were 162 U.S. peacekeepers sent ashore by order of U.S. representative Stevens to protect American lives and property and to intervene if necessary to prevent arson and looting. But A Congressional investigation found that the troops were specifically ordered not to interfere or help either side in the revolution, did not take over any buildings or patrol the streets, stayed in barracks because they were not needed, and gave no materials or assistance to either side in the revolution. See the 808-page official report of the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs at
    http://morganreport.org
    UNSTATED TRUTH: The most important, most highly credible scientific survey on the Akaka bill was done by Zogby in November 2009. A press release and full report on Zogby stationery includes text of the questions along with statistical analysis and professional interpretation of the results. Once again it showed that a majority of Hawaii’s people oppose the Akaka bill, and an even larger majority want a ballot referendum on the question.
    http://grassrootinstitute.org/press-releases/2009_akakapoll
    FOR ADDITIONAL READING: “Hawaii Statehood — straightening out the history-twisters. A historical narrative defending the legitimacy of the revolution of 1893, the annexation of 1898, and the statehood vote of 1959.”
    http://tinyurl.com/n2zzeo
    and also
    “Hawaiian Apartheid: Racial Separatism and Ethnic Nationalism in the Aloha State”
    http://tinyurl.com/2a9fqa
    — Kenneth R. Conklin, Ph.D.
  4. 4. January 17, 2012 3:30 pm Link
    I want to correct a huge error in your blog post. The author states, “Queen Liliuokalani was arrested for her alleged role in the coup and convicted of treason; while under house arrest, the queen agreed to formally abdicate and dissolve the monarchy.” but agreeing to abdicate is very different from temporarily yielding her authority because of unjust circumstances.
    She did, indeed, yield her authority to avoid bloodshed but fully expected her authority to be returned after the President of the U.S. and congress had the opportunity to investigate the circumstances around the overthrow. That is far from the definition of “abdicate”!
    Here is the Queen’s statement yielding her authority and protesting the illegal overthrow on January 17, 1893:
    “I Liliʻuokalani, by the Grace of God and under the Constitution of the Hawaiian Kingdom, Queen, do hereby solemnly protest against any and all acts done against myself and the Constitutional Government of the Hawaiian Kingdom by certain persons claiming to have established a Provisional Government of and for this Kingdom.
    That I yield to the superior force of the United States of America whose Minister Plenipotentiary, His Excellency John L. Stevens, has caused United States troops to be landed at Honolulu and declared that he would support the Provisional Government.
    Now to avoid any collision of armed forces, and perhaps the loss of life, I do this under protest and impelled by said force yield my authority until such time as the Government of the United States shall, upon facts being presented to it, undo the action of its representatives and reinstate me in the authority which I claim as the Constitutional Sovereign of the Hawaiian Islands.”
    President Cleveland ordered an investigation and later declared, “Substantial wrong has thus been done which a due regard for our national character as well as the rights of the injured people requires we should endeavor to repair the monarchy.” Cleveland further stated in his 1893 State of the Union Address that, “Upon the facts developed it seemed to me the only honorable course for our Government to pursue was to undo the wrong that had been done by those representing us and to restore as far as practicable the status existing at the time of our forcible intervention.”
    As we all know, those were hollow words because justice was never enforced. To this day, there exists no formal treaty or legal document giving sovereignty of the Hawaiian Islands to the United States, and therefore, it is questionable whether Hawaii is legally even a part of the U.S. The basis of territorial annexation and later statehood cannot be founded upon a fraudulent foundation – that is, the notion that Queen Liliuokalani ceded Hawaii to the U.S.
    — Keith Hirata
  5. 5. January 17, 2012 4:06 pm Link
    This is a story that does not get told in most schools here in the Mainland US. I only learned of it in 1993 when I was a university student. Absolutely disgraceful.
    — Sabrina
  6. 6. January 17, 2012 8:13 pm Link
    At least this article gets the word out. Not much is said about Hawaii’s history in US History classes. When people wonder why America is so hated, this can be pointed at as one example.
    The Akaka Bill is a good start, but should not be the end all.
    — Josh
  7. 7. January 17, 2012 8:13 pm Link
    It’s over quit complaining. If Hawaii was not apart of the united states then it would be a third world country on par with all the other poor south east asain nations. Native Hawaiians should be thanking us for bringing them civilization. You will never be a sovereign nation again based on your strategic position in the middle of the pacific. If you were not taken by the U.S. Youbdoing be apart of China, RUssia, or Japan.
    — Rick
  8. 8. January 17, 2012 8:19 pm Link
    I really like this article. Pretty basic and straightforward. Although, along with Keith Hirata’s correction, I’d like to point out that the original missionaries were not the ones who tried to overthrow the Hawaiian government, but their grandchildren. Yes, they tried to reform it a bit, and succeeded some, but were never opposed to a sovereign Hawaiian nation. They enjoyed the benefits of the Hawaiian Kingdom for about three generations.
    — Garrett “Ka’ili” Wells Jr.
  9. 9. January 17, 2012 9:26 pm Link
    What the US did was wrong. The Apology Resolution acknowledged that. Since the overthrow 119 years ago, Hawaiians have fought to regain their nation and control of their lands. Hawaiians signed 556 pages of Ku’e Petitions against annexation. The 1970s marked the beginning of the Hawaiian renaissance movement which resulted in the protection of Kaho`olawe from military bombing, the Hokule`a voyages, the recognition of Hawaiian cultural rights and the creation of the Office of Hawaiian Affairs. Just as in 1893, we have a new “Committee on Safety” made up of some descendants of those who overthrew Queen Lili‘uokalani, who have filled our courts system with legal attacks against Hawaiian programs. In order for Hawaiians to hold onto our programs, reclaim our heritage, culture, and identity, we must be allowed to control our own destiny. Federal recognition is a step toward Native Hawaiians not just surviving but thriving in our own homeland.
    — Jeannine Johnson
  10. 10. January 17, 2012 9:46 pm Link
    Aloha to the beautiful people of Hawaii. I support any compensation that the US can offer although as in the case of Native Americans, it is weak at best. What the US and whites in general have done to native cultures is appalling. Any restitution has my support but it is never enough. I think of Bruddah IZ and Hawaii ’78 and breaks my heart. I love Hawaii and the Hawaiian people. So Aloha and Mahalo to you my friends.
    — Alice Parker
  11. 11. January 18, 2012 12:33 am Link
    It is wrong to grant special rights and privileges to some Americans with less tha 1 percent native Hawaiian blood and to give the same unconditionally to future generations with a perpetually decreasing blood quantum. We are creating a future society divided by a magical racial tag. It is immoral and probably unconstitutional. Hawaiians were never an Indian tribe. At the time of the revolution most inhabitants of this multiracial society had no native blood. Now they seek to create a new racial naton within a nation which goes way beyond recognizing a tribe.
    — Paul de Silvan
  12. 12. January 18, 2012 2:35 am Link
    Here’s some good reading about the truth of Hawai`i’s history:
    — Brennan
  13. 13. January 18, 2012 3:47 am Link
    For you people getting your info out of a book, does it really matter which story is right? Hawaii was the homeland of Hawaiians. Did the foreigners come here due to the nice weather? No matter what the story, who is a native Hawaiian? I am considered a native, but I do not qualify for Hawaiian homestead! No, because I am not 50 percent. My kids don’t qualify for Hawaiian programs! So why does it matter what the true story is? We are suppose to step forward and be counted. The Akaka Bill, will us mixed-race people get a piece of the rock? You want our say, but there is nothing in it for us. Hawaii, no more!
    — Deb White
  14. 14. January 18, 2012 4:25 am Link
    The thing I wanted to clarify most was that Hawai`i was NOT annexed in 1898. It may sound like semantics, but I think it’s a crucial distinction. What was passed in 1898 was the Newlands Resolution, which was a joint-resolution passed by the US Congress. It was and is an internal/domestic resolution and has no power outside of America. At that time Hawai`i was very clearly it’s own country and it isn’t possible that the US ‘annexed’ Hawaii through a joint-resolution–they would need a treaty of annexation, which was never ratified. For example, America could not today pass legislation that makes another country part of the US, nor could the State of California say, “aaaaand, now Utah is also ours”–there has to be an agreement between parties. US claims in Hawai`i are dubious at best. And my fear with the Akaka bill is the appearance of acquiescence. It is an opportunity to further legitimize illegitimate claims to Hawai`i. It is a classic case of manufactured consent, a ploy to make it look like Hawaiians are saying ‘yes’ to being a part of America.
    — Shelley
  15. 15. January 18, 2012 7:15 am Link
    I’m 1/2 Hawaiian & 1/2 Irish, born & raised in Honolulu, Hawaii, currently relocated to Washington State. What happened to the Hawaiian Kingdom is a disgrace, the bottom line is Hawaii was taken illegally. This needs to be fixed.
    — Erin Gorai
  16. 16. January 18, 2012 4:00 pm Link
    I think that it’s important for people to consider the contemporary situation and the facts that surround this issue.
    Dr. Keanu Sai clears up some of the facts surrounding the issue of Hawaiian sovereignty. Kenneth R. Conklin states, “Unfortunately this “learning network” article is delivering factual falsehoods and lousy interpretation to the readers.” and then proceeds to list what he believes are “truths”. After reading this article it makes me question how credible these “truths” really are.
    I think it is important that an article like this is written to educate people who may not have learned of the Hawaiians plight. However, it is important to remember the facts.
    — Gavin Silva
  17. 17. January 19, 2012 10:11 am Link
    After the coup d’état on January 17, 1893, Queen Liliuokalani of the Kingdom of Hawai`i (also known as the Hawaiian Kingdom, Government of the Hawaiian Islands) made a formal protest to the superior forces of the United States of America and no other. President Cleveland states: “Should not the great wrong done to a feeble but independent State by an abuse of authority of the United States be undone by restoring the legitimate government? Anything short of that will not, I respectfully submit, satisfy the demands of justice.” “Can the United States consistently insist that other nations shall respect the independence of Hawaii while not respecting it themselves? Our Government was the first to recognize the independence of the Islands, and it should be the last to acquire sovereignty over them by force and fraud.”
    Due to admitted acts of insurgency, rebellion and the overthrow of the Constitutional Monarchy of the Kingdom of Hawai’i, the de jure Nation is under a continued impairment and is properly considered as an irregular state. The unlawful acts and seditious agreements between the United States Foreign Minister, John L. Stevens, the American and European sugar planters, descendants of missionaries, financiers, and naval representatives and armed forces to overthrow the sovereignty of the Kingdom of Hawai’i and establish and claim de facto Provisional Government status and capacity are void and of no effect from the very inception and implementation of their conspiratorial scheme until the end of time itself. No Sovereign dominion accrued to nor is extended to the usurpers, nor their heirs or assigns, and were and are destined by their unlawful acts and omissions to remain de facto forever.
    The acknowledged force and threat of force used to overthrow the Constitutional Government of the Kingdom of Hawai’i, in contravention of long recognized principles of international law, left the de jure Government in exile, and leaves the de facto Government in want of lawful authority and dominion. It is this plus the Newlands resolution, “a violation of the United States of America constitution” in which the self-declared Republic of Hawaii ceded sovereignty over the Hawaiian Islands to the United States.
    Today the State of Hawaii and its Office of Hawaiian Affairs move fourth in a manner not compliant to the rule of law, thus shrugging the burden of liberty and morality back onto to what it calls its predecessors the U.S.A. It is this type of disrespect that not only clouds the title “Authority” to land here in Hawaii but also keeps the people of Hawaii both native and non-native alike in a disenfranchised environment.
    It should be noted that this and things like federal recognition has only continued this fraudulent action, thus providing the means for revisionists to continue the fraud promoted by the usurpers some 100 plus ago….
    — Kealii Makekau
********************************************
Note:  The following is my post which has to be reviewed first......I'll be very shocked if they actually print it!  lol ;p
  1. One of the most valuable works that came off of the NEW YORK TIMES changes the entire view of of Hawaii's history due to premeditation activities.  See the following:

    http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F00617FD345B1A738DDD...

    PEARL HARBOR COALING STATION.; IMPERATIVE NECESSITY ...
     
    query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res...
    Pearl Harbor is regarded by these maritime as the best site for a war-supply depot in the Pacific. Onoe secured by Jingluud. it places her principal station 2700 ...
    You've visited this page 3 times. Last visit: 1/5/12
    Images for pearl harbor coaling station
     - Report images

         see the article that was posted in the actual newspaper which I pulled up after researcher Shane Lee found the online link above:

    https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/nGJiD73VvudrOxLNB3dUEg

    There's other premeditation issues found which affects what really happened... see articles, news at theiolani.blogspot.com and http://iolani.wordpress.com

    some of the following from the NEW YORK TIMES also affects the history as well:

     1895-
    President Cleveland Gave Hawaii Back to Queen Liliuokalani https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B6Gs4av5Se1wN2JkZjMxMzEtMDIyNi00YW…

    https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B6Gs4av5Se1wN2JkZjMxMzEtMDIyNi00YW…

     
     The Hawaiian Disgrace http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F70A1FF7345D11738…

    http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F70A1FF7345D11738…

     Shameful Conspiracy https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B6Gs4av5Se1wN2Y2YjAwOTItOTEwMC00Mz…

    https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B6Gs4av5Se1wN2Y2YjAwOTItOTEwMC00Mz…

    ********

    What does it mean when premeditation to dethrone the Queen is documented by your good newspaper?

    What does it mean when the Queen was under duress, usurpation, coercion, and usurpation due to armed men 162 men according to your information, with gatling guns, cannons who left the BOSTON two days before the wrongful, criminal dethronement?

    What does it mean when they dethroned the Queen, the Sovereign when the Hawaiian Government is made up of three (3) parts:  1) Sovereign -permanent part; 2) the House of Nobles - permanent part; and 3) the House of Representatives - the temporary voted in part which housed the treasonous persons, supported by the U.S. government,.....which turned into the Provisional government, then Republic, then Territory, and State of Hawaii with documented oppositions every step of the way.

    What does it mean when a fraud deed to Pearl Harbor was made by a King/King Kalakaua who had no rights to convey Private Property which was part of the alodio/ano alodio given by Kauikeouli/Kamehameha III?  I was in the court case and stated "Fraud"  --- King Kalakaua by the way became King with the help of treasonous banker Charles Reed Bishop and the armed American military who left their ship at the request of Charles Reed Bishop who was an American spy, a Rothschild banker, who married a wealthy member, one of the descendants of Kamehameha?

    What does it mean when the Akaka bill pursued nowadays perpetuate criminal deviance because Daniel Akaka's ancestor Thomas Akaka was in Washington DC in 1892 planning the overthrow with Dr. Mott-Smith, Lorrin Thurston, and secret letters with President Harrison ---

    The points being that premeditation, threat, duress, coercion, usurpation, fraud (1- Queen Emma was part of the permanent body of the Sovereign part of the government, was a Kamehameha heir ....King Kalakaua was a puppet supported by a pirate, treasonous banker Charles Reed Bishop;  2 - Pearl Harbor land deed signed in 1876 was a Fraud and documented so in court - First Circuit Court condemnation case - State of Hawaii vs. KSBE/Kamehameha Schools Bishop Estates, et. als.)... Oppositions to the criminals have been made every step of the way thru annexation opposition; thru Statehood opposition; thru ongoing oppositions to the Akaka Bill especially coming from members of the Royal Families who descend from the Sovereign - Kamehameha; heirs of Kauikeouli/Kamehameha III with documented Sovereignty, descendants/heirs of the House of Nobles the permanent body of the Hawaiian Government representing 2/3 of the Hawaiian Government de jure and defending the Crown Lands in Court - active case.

    The land owners exists, all actions made by those against the Queen and her subjects are null and void due to stress, duress, coercion, usurpation, fraud, treason, and genocide documented.  The U.S. remain documented occupiers, belligerent occupiers who planned the overthrow of a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation.  The State of Hawaii is operating illegally in the Hawaiian Islands and needs to be under the American Consulate or the American Embassy because the permanent treaties are and remain in place with many nations, including the U.S.

    I would like to read the true, correct, updated Hawaiian History based on your documented NEW YORK TIMES articles which includes the links given.  Thank you.

    aloha.

    additional reference about documented oppositions by Queen Liliuokalani

    1897 – Annexation Opposition by Queen Liliuokalani found by researcher Kiliwehi Kekumano:https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B6Gs4av5Se1wOGJmZjg4MmQtNWRjMS00NT…

    https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B6Gs4av5Se1wOGJmZjg4MmQtNWRjMS00NT…


    Annexation Opposition (page 2) https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B6Gs4av5Se1wNWVlMTc0MjEtZWZiZS00Y2…

    https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B6Gs4av5Se1wNWVlMTc0MjEtZWZiZS00Y2…


    Annexation Opposition (page 3) https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B6Gs4av5Se1wY2RjYzZmNjQtMjUxYi00Zm…

    https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B6Gs4av5Se1wY2RjYzZmNjQtMjUxYi00Zm…

    Annexation Opposition (page 4) https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B6Gs4av5Se1wNmY2Mzk3ZTctZDEyMy00Yz…

    https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B6Gs4av5Se1wNmY2Mzk3ZTctZDEyMy00Yz…


  4. PEARL HARBOR COALING STATION.; IMPERATIVE NECESSITY ...

     
    query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res...
    Pearl Harbor is regarded by these maritime as the best site for a war-supply depot in the Pacific. Onoe secured by Jingluud. it places her principal station 2700 ...
    You've visited this page 3 times. Last visit: 1/5/12

  5. Images for pearl harbor coaling station

     - Report images
    • You
    • One of the most
Views: 258
Replies are closed for this discussion.
Stop Following – Don't email me when people reply

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Amelia Gora on January 23, 2012 at 8:29am
Delete
June 18, 2011

Liliuo Free by Hawaiian Nation | Song | Free Music, Listen Now

 
www.myspace.com/hawaiination/music/songs/liliuo-free-24868538
Liliuo Free by Hawaiian Nation: Listen to, download, play and stream the song, Liliuo Free, on demand.
    Permalink Reply by Amelia Gora on January 28, 2012 at 6:10am
    Delete
    ********************************************Today's the 28th of January and the following was not posted on the NEW YORK TIMES website, and funny how there seems to be a problem now to get to the information at the links at NEW YORK TIMES...............genocide activities if this continues.........
    Note:  The following is my post which has to be reviewed first......I'll be very shocked if they actually print it!  lol ;p
    1. One of the most valuable works that came off of the NEW YORK TIMES changes the entire view of of Hawaii's history due to premeditation activities.  See the following:

      http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F00617FD345B1A738DDD...

      PEARL HARBOR COALING STATION.; IMPERATIVE NECESSITY ...
       
      query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res...
      Pearl Harbor is regarded by these maritime as the best site for a war-supply depot in the Pacific. Onoe secured by Jingluud. it places her principal station 2700 ...
      You've visited this page 3 times. Last visit: 1/5/12
      Images for pearl harbor coaling station
       - Report images

           see the article that was posted in the actual newspaper which I pulled up after researcher Shane Lee found the online link above:

      https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/nGJiD73VvudrOxLNB3dUEg

      There's other premeditation issues found which affects what really happened... see articles, news at theiolani.blogspot.com and http://iolani.wordpress.com

      some of the following from the NEW YORK TIMES also affects the history as well:

       1895-
      President Cleveland Gave Hawaii Back to Queen Liliuokalani https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B6Gs4av5Se1wN2JkZjMxMzEtMDIyNi00YW…

      https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B6Gs4av5Se1wN2JkZjMxMzEtMDIyNi00YW…

       
       The Hawaiian Disgrace http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F70A1FF7345D11738…

      http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F70A1FF7345D11738…

       Shameful Conspiracy https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B6Gs4av5Se1wN2Y2YjAwOTItOTEwMC00Mz…

      https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B6Gs4av5Se1wN2Y2YjAwOTItOTEwMC00Mz…

      ********

      What does it mean when premeditation to dethrone the Queen is documented by your good newspaper?

      What does it mean when the Queen was under duress, usurpation, coercion, and usurpation due to armed men 162 men according to your information, with gatling guns, cannons who left the BOSTON two days before the wrongful, criminal dethronement?

      What does it mean when they dethroned the Queen, the Sovereign when the Hawaiian Government is made up of three (3) parts:  1) Sovereign -permanent part; 2) the House of Nobles - permanent part; and 3) the House of Representatives - the temporary voted in part which housed the treasonous persons, supported by the U.S. government,.....which turned into the Provisional government, then Republic, then Territory, and State of Hawaii with documented oppositions every step of the way.

      What does it mean when a fraud deed to Pearl Harbor was made by a King/King Kalakaua who had no rights to convey Private Property which was part of the alodio/ano alodio given by Kauikeouli/Kamehameha III?  I was in the court case and stated "Fraud"  --- King Kalakaua by the way became King with the help of treasonous banker Charles Reed Bishop and the armed American military who left their ship at the request of Charles Reed Bishop who was an American spy, a Rothschild banker, who married a wealthy member, one of the descendants of Kamehameha?

      What does it mean when the Akaka bill pursued nowadays perpetuate criminal deviance because Daniel Akaka's ancestor Thomas Akaka was in Washington DC in 1892 planning the overthrow with Dr. Mott-Smith, Lorrin Thurston, and secret letters with President Harrison ---

      The points being that premeditation, threat, duress, coercion, usurpation, fraud (1- Queen Emma was part of the permanent body of the Sovereign part of the government, was a Kamehameha heir ....King Kalakaua was a puppet supported by a pirate, treasonous banker Charles Reed Bishop;  2 - Pearl Harbor land deed signed in 1876 was a Fraud and documented so in court - First Circuit Court condemnation case - State of Hawaii vs. KSBE/Kamehameha Schools Bishop Estates, et. als.)... Oppositions to the criminals have been made every step of the way thru annexation opposition; thru Statehood opposition; thru ongoing oppositions to the Akaka Bill especially coming from members of the Royal Families who descend from the Sovereign - Kamehameha; heirs of Kauikeouli/Kamehameha III with documented Sovereignty, descendants/heirs of the House of Nobles the permanent body of the Hawaiian Government representing 2/3 of the Hawaiian Government de jure and defending the Crown Lands in Court - active case.

      The land owners exists, all actions made by those against the Queen and her subjects are null and void due to stress, duress, coercion, usurpation, fraud, treason, and genocide documented.  The U.S. remain documented occupiers, belligerent occupiers who planned the overthrow of a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation.  The State of Hawaii is operating illegally in the Hawaiian Islands and needs to be under the American Consulate or the American Embassy because the permanent treaties are and remain in place with many nations, including the U.S.

      I would like to read the true, correct, updated Hawaiian History based on your documented NEW YORK TIMES articles which includes the links given.  Thank you.

      aloha.

      additional reference about documented oppositions by Queen Liliuokalani

      1897 – Annexation Opposition by Queen Liliuokalani found by researcher Kiliwehi Kekumano:https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B6Gs4av5Se1wOGJmZjg4MmQtNWRjMS00NT…

      https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B6Gs4av5Se1wOGJmZjg4MmQtNWRjMS00NT…


      Annexation Opposition (page 2) https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B6Gs4av5Se1wNWVlMTc0MjEtZWZiZS00Y2…

      https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B6Gs4av5Se1wNWVlMTc0MjEtZWZiZS00Y2…


      Annexation Opposition (page 3) https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B6Gs4av5Se1wY2RjYzZmNjQtMjUxYi00Zm…

      https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B6Gs4av5Se1wY2RjYzZmNjQtMjUxYi00Zm…

      Annexation Opposition (page 4) https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B6Gs4av5Se1wNmY2Mzk3ZTctZDEyMy00Yz…

      https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B6Gs4av5Se1wNmY2Mzk3ZTctZDEyMy00Yz…


    4. PEARL HARBOR COALING STATION.; IMPERATIVE NECESSITY ...

       
      query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res...
      Pearl Harbor is regarded by these maritime as the best site for a war-supply depot in the Pacific. Onoe secured by Jingluud. it places her principal station 2700 ...
      You've visited this page 3 times. Last visit: 1/5/12

    5. Images for pearl harbor coaling station

       - Report images 
      Permalink Reply by Amelia Gora on January 29, 2012 at 2:29pm
      Delete
      Someone's spamming to divert the important issues..............
        Permalink Reply by Amelia Gora on February 6, 2012 at 1:39am
        Delete
        As suspected, I checked once again to see if my post above was entered at the NEW YORK TIMES and it was not...........so therefore, the Premeditation Issues continue and seems to be pushed to the side because Premeditation is problematic for the U.S.
        Now, let's see the articles put out by the NEW YORK TIMES in regards to the Pearl Harbor Coaling Station:

        1. PEARL HARBOR COALING STATION ... - New York Times

           
          query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res...
          Pearl Harbor is regarded by these maritime as the best site for a war-supply depot in the Pacific. Onoe secured by Jingluud. it places her principal station 2700 ...
        Note:  This article was posted on January 9, 1893 or seven (7) days before wrongfully dethroning Queen Liliuokalani.  There appears to be a block on this page now.

        1. PEARL HARBOR COALING STATION. - IMPERATIVE NECESSITY ...

           
          query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res...
          WASHINGTON, Jan. 8. -- The United States, through the inactivity of the Navy Department and the indifference of the State Department, is likely to lose the only ...
        Note:  This article was posted on January 9, 1893 or seven (7) days before wrongfully dethroning Queen Liliuokalani.  There appears there seems to be a block on this page now.

        1. WOULD OCCUPY PEARL HARBOR.; President ... - New York Times

           
          query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res...
          ... disposal to establish coaling stations for the specific purpose of establishing a coaling station inPearl Harbor, Hawaii. Should he do this, the Hawaiians would ...
        Note:  This article was posted on March 21, 1894  http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F50916F73F5515738...

        1. TO BUY PEARL HARBOR.; PROBABLE ESTABLISHMENT OF A ...

           
          query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res...
          ... soon turn its attention to tbe purchase of Pearl Harbor In tne Hawaiian Islands. ... suitable for the establishment of a coaling station, can tie had for $250000.
        Note:  This article is dated October 27, 1892 see:  http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F50F1FFE385C17738...
        **************************
        Now, let's put all of this in Chronological Order which includes the Permanent Treaty with the U.S., the Conventions with the U.S. or the Reciprocity Treaty:
        1850 -
        Permanent Treaty signed:

        Article I

        There shall be perpetual peace and amity between the United States and the King of the Hawaiian Islands, his heirs and his successors.
        1861 -

        1. Affairs in the Sandwich Islands. - A ... - New York Times

           
          www.nytimes.com/.../news/affairs-sandwich-islands-proclamation-ne...
          Affairs in the Sandwich Islands.; A PROCLAMATION OF NEUTRALITY TROUBLE WITH THE FRENCH GOVERNMENT. Published: November 3, 1861. Sign In to ...
        1870 -

        1. WASHINGTON. - Rejection of the Sandwich ... - New York Times

           
          query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res...
          WASHINGTON.; Rejection of the Sandwich Island Treaty--Further Consideration of the Tax Bill--The Income Tax--Spotted Tail's Complaints--Arrival of Red Cloud ...

        WASHINGTON.; Rejection of the Sandwich Island Treaty--Further Consideration of the Tax Bill--The Income Tax--Spotted Tail's Complaints--Arrival of Red Cloud and his Chiefs and Grent Men--Their Appearance and Behavior.

        Special Dispatch to the New-York Times. ();
        June 02, 1870,
        , Section , Page 4, Column , words
        [ DISPLAYING ABSTRACT ]
        The Senate was almost wholly devoted to the consideration of the Sandwich Islands Reciprocity treaty, today, n Executive Session. Mr. CORBETT made a speech in its favor, and Mr. MORRILL, of Vermont, against it.
        view full article button pdf icon Note: This article will open in PDF format. Get Adobe Acrobat Reader or Learn More »

        1. SANDWICH ISLAND SUGAR.; DECISION OF THE ... - New York Times

           
          query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res...
          SANDWICH ISLAND SUGAR.; DECISION OF THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY AFFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT OF DUTY AT SAN FRANCISCO ON AN ...
        Note:  Was not able to access this article; however, it exists.
        1873 -

        SANDWICH ISLANDS.; Inaugural Address of King ... - New York Times

         
        query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res...
        SANDWICH ISLANDS.; Inaugural Address of King Lunalilo Reforms Proposed. E-MAIL. February 22, 1873, Wednesday. Page 1, 137 words. The first paragraph ..
        Note:  'The Commercial Advertiser wishes the King (Lunalilo) to visit the United States, to negotiate a treaty of Reciprocity with the Washington Government." http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9C0DE1DB1539EF34B...



        1875 - Hawaii - United States Treaty
        Ratified by the Hawaiian Islands April 17, 1875
        Ratified by the President of the United States, with amendments, May 31, 1875
        Ratifications exchanged at Washington, June 3, 1875
        Entered into force September 9, 1876
        Supplemented by Convention of December 6, 1884

        Convention of 1883 - with the U.S. Postal Service and Money Orders

        Convention - Having to do with Goods/Trade
        Ratified by the Hawaiian Islands April 17, 1875
        Ratified by the President of the United States, with amendments, May 31, 1875
        Ratifications exchanged at Washington, June 3, 1875
        Entered into force September 9, 1876
        Supplemented by Convention of December 6, 1884

        Note:  There is no "ceding Pearl Harbor to the U.S."....these are the words for the seven (7) year agreement which would expire in 1894:

        His Majesty the King of the Hawaiian Islands grants to the Govrnment of the United States the exclusive right to enter the harbor of the Pearl River in the Island of Oahu, and to establish and maintain there a coaling and repair station for the use of vessels of the United States, and to that end the United States may improve the entrance to said harbor and do all other things needful to the purpose aforesaid.



          Permalink Reply by Amelia Gora on February 6, 2012 at 2:03am
          Delete
          1887 - An article appeared in the NEW YORK TIMES, dated November 3, 1887, which does not appear on the internet:

          " THE SANDWICH ISLANDS. 
          San Francisco, Nov. 2 - Mail advices from the Hawaiian Islands are to the effect that the Hawaiian Government had decided to cede Pearl River Harbor to the United States as a coaling station, but provisions is made that in case the present reciprocity treaty is abrogated, the American Government shall relinquish the harbor.  The harbor in question is near Honolulu, and is regarded as the finest in the Hawaiian group.  Whether the harbor will be accepted with the conditions attached is not known."

          1889 -
          "To Extend the Treaty.  What the Hawaiian Cabinet Desires to Effect......"
          Note:  The U.S. sought to have further stipulations and "To enable the United States Government to do this without danger of complications with the other powers, we do agree not to negotiate treaties with other nations without the knowledge of the United States Government."

          Note:  This article does not appear on the web/ NEW YORK TIMES website.  Here it shows that the "Hawaiian Cabinet Desires to Effect...." therefore, this is further evidence of treasonous activities against the Sovereign, the House of Nobles.

          Reference:  NEW YORK TIMES, October 19, 1889, Main Library, Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaii.

          1890 -
          Note:  The Minister Austin was hoping to enter treaty negotiations to hasten Annexation to the United States  see:  http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F70A16F6395F10738...

          1892 -

          1. TO BUY PEARL HARBOR.; PROBABLE ESTABLISHMENT OF A ...

             
            query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res...
            ... soon turn its attention to tbe purchase of Pearl Harbor In tne Hawaiian Islands. ... suitable for the establishment of a coaling station, can tie had for $250000.
          Note:  This article is dated October 27, 1892 see: http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F50F1FFE385C17738...

          Note:  The author of the article promoted Annexation.  He documented the following regarding the treaty when King Kalakaua was alive:
          "The provision to land troops killed  the proposed treaty and produced a reaction by the natives, a reaction which the King himself secretly led."
          Reference:  PARADISE IN THE PACIFIC.... NEW YORK TIMES, November 6, 1892, Main Library, Honolulu, Oahu

          PARADISE IN THE PACIFIC; THE MANY ATTRACTIONS OF THE SANDWICH ISLANDS. SO SITUATED THAT THEY ARE BOUND TO INCREASE IN IMPORTANCE -- A GROWING BELIEF THAT THEY WILL EVENTUALLY BE ANNEXED BY THE UNITED STATES.

          A.R.C. ();
          November 06, 1892,
          , Section , Page 14, Column , words
          [ DISPLAYING ABSTRACT ]
          Copyrighted, 1892, by the the New-York Times. HONOLULU, Oct 1. -- Sailing for six days due Southwest from San Francisco, the steamers or the Union Steamsnip Company reach Honolulu, distant 2,100 miles. If you will glance at a map of the Pacific, you will be struck with the fact that the Sandwich Island group looks to be a half-way house of call for the three great continents of North America, Australia, and Asia.
          view full article button pdf icon Note: This article will open in PDF format. Get Adobe Acrobat Reader or Learn More »

          1. PEARL HARBOR COALING STATION. - IMPERATIVE NECESSITY ...

             
            query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res...
            WASHINGTON, Jan. 8. -- The United States, through the inactivity of the Navy Department and the indifference of the State Department, is likely to lose the only ...
          Note:  This article was posted on January 9, 1893 or seven (7) days before wrongfully dethroning Queen Liliuokalani.  There appears there seems to be a block on this page now.
          The most important part of this article is the last paragraph about "not mention the troops", etc.
          This article was found by researcher Shane Lee which shows PREMEDITATION TO ASSUME A Neutral, friendly, non violent nation.
          Note:  The article in the NEW YORK TIMES about the Hawaiian Cabinet Wavering appeared AFTER the Japanese Minister's article.  It was printed as two (2) SEPARATE articles.
          The following bit of information is important and shows PREMEDITATION because the date of the article was January 4, 1893:
          "a resolution of lack of confidence in the Hawaiian Cabinet would be passed by the Legislature and the Cabinet would resign.  The Queen is said to be in sympathy with this movement and, according to the letter, will appoint at least three natives to the Cabinet."
          "Nobles and representatives to the number of twenty-five, which is a little more than a majority of the members, are said to have signed the resolution.  It was intended to keep this move secret until after the Australia sailed for San Francis.  The correspondent, who claims to have inside information, says that in an hour after the steamer sailed the Legislature would be called together and the resolution adopted."
          Reference:  THE NEW YORK TIMES, January 14, 1893, Main Library, Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaii

          Japanese Minister's Guests.; The Hawaiian Cabinet Wavering. The Federation of Labor.

          [ DISPLAYING ABSTRACT ]
          WASHINGTON, Jan. 13 -- The Japanese Minister and Mme.Tateno gave a dinner party to-night, at which the guests of honor were the Secretary of State and Mrs. John W. Foster. The decorations were in the Japanese colors, red and white, of Jacqueminot and American Beauty roses. The guest cards were squares of thick card board, flecked with gold Japanese figures.
          view full article button pdf icon Note: This article will open in PDF format. Get Adobe Acrobat Reader or Learn More » 
          http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=FA0F17FF3C5515738...

          1893 - January 15. American Minister Stevens and men left the steamship -of-war BOSTON "to protect American lives and property," with their "three companies of bluejackets, one of artillery, one of marines, 154 mean and 10 officers; with 14,000 cartridges for rifles and the Gatling gun, 1,300 revolver cartridges, and 174 explosive shells for the revolving cannon.
          An 1876 Gatling gun preserved at Fort Laramie National Historic Site
          Ustroopshawaiirevolution.jpg
          The USS Boston's landing force on duty at the Arlington Hotel, Honolulu, at the time of the overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy, January 1893. Lieutenant Lucien Young, USN, commanded the detachment, and is presumably the officer at right. [ 1 ] picture from :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overthrow_of_the_Kingdom_of_Hawaii

          These forces were landed, on foreign soil, not at the request of the lawful Government - the Governor of Oahu promptly sent a formal note of protest to Minister Stevens - representing 88,000 of the population, but at the request of a committee of rebels representing 2,000 American residents."

          "One company was left at the legation where the "American life and property" were to be found, while the rest of the force was marched to 
          Arlon Hall, a structure close to the palace and just across the street from the Government Building, where, of course, the rebels would necessarily make their attack."

          1893. January 16. The Rear Admiral reported that "Arlon Hall was ill=chosen for the professed purpose for which the troops were landed. "Naturally," he adds, "if they were landed with a view to supporting the Provisional Government troops than occupying the Government Building, it was a wise choice."

          1893 - January 17. The American "conspirators signed their proclamation announcing that the Hawaiian monarchy had been "abrogated" and a Provisional Government established, with Sanford B. Dole as Chairman of the Executive Council."

          "They took this to the Government Building and there read it, within seventy-five yards of the point where the United States forces were stationed with their Gatling gun and small cannon."

          "With only the Government Building in their hands, the Queen being at the palace and her troops in possession of the police station, and but for the overawing force of United States troops in possession also of the city, the rebels posted off to the American Legation with a request for recognition. They got it with extraordinary promptness. The Provisional Government was proclaimed between 2 and 3 o'clock. Two hours later the new Government had received the following document, which, to our shame, will live in history:

          United States Legation.
          Honolulu, Hawaiian Islands, Jan. 17, 1893.

          A Provisional Government having been duly constituted in place of the recent Government of Queen Liliuokalani, and said Provisional Government being in full possession of the Government buildings, the archives, and the Treasury, and in control of the capital of the Hawaiian Islands. I hereby recognize said Provisional Government as the de facto Government of the Hawaiian Islands.

          JOHN L. STEVENS
          Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary of the United States.

          Noted by author of the NEW YORK TIMES article, "The Story of a Crime": 

          "The Dole conspirators were not "in full possession of the Government buildings." but of only one of them, which was occupied only by clerks and porters at the time of their raid..............it was still too early to apply the word "recent" to the Government of the Queen, for the rebels did not wait on the Queen with their treasonable proclamation until after Minister Stevens had recognized their Government."

          "The Queen yielded, of course,. She could do nothing else against a rebellion that was so manifestly backed up by the superior armed forces and by the Minister of the United States. She signed, under protest, a paper renouncing her rights."

          Queen Liliuokalani in 1895 was forced to sign an abdication by conspirators, treasonous persons, pirates, Sanford B. Dole, et. als. 

          Note:

          Queen Liliuokalani returned the government to a Monarchy government when she destroyed the Constitution affecting King Kalakaua's Bayonnet Constitution which was signed at gun point, and a Constitution that she had put together which did not appeal to the Americans in the Hawaiian Islands.

          Queen Liliuokalani utilized her Sovereign authority based on the following:

          1. Hanai/adopted relationship to the Kamehameha line, a leader who formed the monarchygovernment.
          2. Attending the Royal School - a School for Hawaiian leaders - based on genealogies for amonarchy government.
          3. Hanai/adopted daughter of a Kamehameha descendant, part of a monarchy government.

          and another reason taken as an excerpt from above:

          he American "conspirators signed their proclamation announcing that the Hawaiian monarchyhad been "abrogated" and a Provisional Government established, with Sanford B. Dole as Chairman of the Executive Council."

          4. The American's at the time of the wrongful dethronement did proclaim and announce that theHawaiian monarchy was "abrogated".

          In other words, the recognition of a monarchy form of government, not a Constitutional monarchy government was documented in 1893, and the fact that our Hawaiian Monarchy did go "underground", which means that our Hawaiian monarchy did not cease to exist!

          Queen Liliuokalani was under duress, stress, coercion, usurpation, and it was a documented fact found that the U.S. aided, planned the criminal assumption of a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation, and did cause the duress, stress, coercion, usurpation, planned the criminal assumption of private properties with their helpers, the Americans, the treasonous persons known as the PIRATES OF THE PACIFIC: CHARLES REED BISHOP AND FRIENDS and did breach the Laws of Nations, killed, caused genocide and PLUNDERED UPON INNOCENTS since their presence from the time of the arrival of their mercenaries, the missionaries in 1820.

          reference: NEW YORK TIMES articles (1) The Story of a Crime; and (2) Pearl Harbor Coaling Station - Imperative Necessity that the United States Take Possession; AFFAIRS IN ASIA, 1st Qtr 1897 - The Republic of Hawaii, an aged article purchased off the internet which came from GREECE! THE LIBERAL newspaper, January 28, 1893, genealogy, history researches, etc.

          1894 -

          1. WOULD OCCUPY PEARL HARBOR.; President ... - New York Times

             
            query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res...
            ... disposal to establish coaling stations for the specific purpose of establishing a coaling station in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. Should he do this, the Hawaiians would ...
          Note:  This article was posted on March 21, 1894 http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F50916F73F5515738...

          1901 - December 6. The Oahu Railway and Land Company deeded Halawa lands "for the purpose of condemning for naval purposes a certain tract of land situated in the District of Ewa, Island of Oahu, Territory of Hawaii.....Registered map #1739....635 acres, more or less." All of this "in pursuant of said agreement and in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10) in lawful money of the United States of America...." "Oahu Railway & Land Co. By S.C. Allen, President; by M.P. Robinson, Treasurer" signed.
          Note: This is the first deed recorded to the U.S. while the true land owners existed, while Queen Liliuokalani was still alive. This shows in part the criminal transactions of criminal deviants transferring lands that did not belong to them, and making it appear that it was a legal transaction.
          1901 - December 6. The Oahu Sugar Company Limited also a Corporation deeded to the United States of America "the sum of Ten (10) Dollars in lawful money of the United States of America............portion of that certain Island shown upon that certain Chart numbered 1800 published by the Hydrographic Office of the United States Navy Department, said Island being known and designated Mokuumeume or Ford Island and said portions ..........containing and including 23 acres, more or less.....". "Oahu Sugar Co. Limited by its 2nd Vice President M.P. Robinson, by its Treasurer H.A. Isenberg" signed the deed.
          Note: This is the second deed recorded to the U.S. while the true land owners existed, while Queen Liliuokalani was still alive. This shows in part the criminal transactions of criminal deviants transferring lands that did not belong to them, and making it appear that it was a legal transaction.
          1901 - U.S. - G. White, Civil Engineer, U.S. mapped Halawa lands , Mokuumeume (Ford Island) showing "Portion of H.O. Chart #1800 Showing Parcwels of Land to be required by the U.S. Government through the Secretary of the Navy by Condemnation Proceedings for Naval Purposes at Pearl Harbor Hawaii Territory Naval Appropriation Act March 3, 1901. Tracing by Ld. E. Newton."
          1902 - Kamehameha Schools Bishop Estates Trustees deeded lands of Halawa to the U.S.! The transaction amount was for $52,737.50 dollars "in lawful money of the United States of America" - the transaction was made "between Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop deceased and Joseph O. Carter, William F. Allen, William O. Smith, Samuel M. Damon, and Alfred W. Carter Trustees under the Will of Bernice Pauahi Bishop deceased and of the Estate of said Bernice Pauahi Bishop, parties of the first part and The United States of America, party of the second part".
          Attached to the deed:
          The map - The date on the map in entry 17) shows at the bottom "Recorded and Compared this 16th day of July A.D. 1902 at 3:40 o'clock P. 71_ " signed/stamped Thos. G. Thrum, Registrar of Conveyances.
          Note: The Territory of Hawaii entity made a condemnation case. The U.S. assumed lands of the Royal families, Grace Kamaikui's ahupuaa. The Trustees of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop were treasonous persons who did not have the rights to convey lands of the Royal families, etc. The claim that they appeared to be moving with was the King David Kalakaua deed which conveyed the Halawa Ahupuaa to Grace Kamaikui and Mataio Kekuanaoa. Grace Kamaikui was the owner of the Halawa Ahupuaa which was already conveyed to her by Kamehameha III - Kauikeouli in 1848. The Ahupuaa belonged to John Young, who left it to his heirs/descendants. John Young was a British counselor of Kamehameha.
          In other words, the claims by the Treasonous Bernice Pauahi Bishop/ Kamehameha Schools Bishop Estates Trustees were and are without right, they had no claims to the Halawa Ahupuaa because John Young's, Grace Kamaikui's descendants existed then, and their descendants exist today (including myself, Amelia Gora). These illegal transactions made by treasonous persons are null and void, the U.S. supported their conspiracy activities, treasonous activities...............see the Premeditation article showing that the U.S. President, and the U.S. Congress did make a standing order to assume the Hawaiian Islands, Pearl Harbor, which is part of the Halawa Ahupuaa, and dethroning Queen Liliuokalani from a neutral, friendly, non violent nation.
          The Roads to WAR with the criminal claims to Pearl Harbor, Halawa lands, Mokuumeume Island (Ford Island) is based on fraud, criminal deviance, piracy(ies), etc. Research incomplete.
          1916 - U.S. Congress perpetuates crimes against Monarchy governments through the Secret Treaty of Verona - 1822 and supports the One World Order/New World Order:
          5 min - Jan 16, 2009 - Uploaded by ForgottenHistoryUSA
          books.google.com Because I can find no official online primary source for the 1916 Congressional Record, I have linked to a copy of "Where is ...
          www.youtube.com/watch?v=_UBXHSFr4bw
          1917 - Queen Liliuokalani died.
          Background:
          Queen Liliuokalani was under duress, stress, coercion, usurpation, which makes the claims of the violators null and void.
          Queen Liliuokalani maintained that the U.S. breached the treaties, and breached the Law of Nations. The U.S., England, departed from the Law of Nations and with the bankers formed organizations which differed from the Law of Nations and move towards One World Order/New World Order.
          Oppositions to Annexation was documented by Queen Liliuokalani and her subjects (21,000+) - seehttp://libweb.hawaii.edu/digicoll/annexation/petition.html vs. 5,000 Americans and their paid off supporters - see PIRATES OF THE PACIFIC: CHARLES REED BISHOP AND FRIENDS athttp://myweb.ecomplanet/GORA8037
          Opposition to the deed of lands/trust of Queen Kapiolani was documented against Princes Kuhio and Kawananakoa who failed to follow the instructions of Queen Kapiolani.
          Opposition to the claimed Trust Deed by Queen Liliuokalani defended by treasonous person Samuel Damon, Curtis Iaukea, and William Smith was documented in the Will of Queen Liliuokalani. Colburn, administrator, failed to make corrections and did support the treasonous Prince Kuhio.
          Queen Liliuokalani's true trustee's descendants existed then and exist today. Issues remain unresolved.
          Families of Queen Liliuokalani existed then, and their descendants exists today.
          Kamehameha's descendants existed then, and their descendants exists today.
          Bernice Pauahi Bishop was NOT the last of the Kamehameha's. Her first cousins descendants existed then, and their descendants exists today.
          Reference:  http://www.opednews.com/Diary/More-Evidence-on-Pearl-Har-by-Amelia-... and other articles, books by Amelia Gora
          Auwe! Genocide Evidence folks.......Send to many....Premeditation by the U.S. against a neutral, friendly nation documented.........fyi.............aloha. 
          Reference:   Article by Amelia Gora (2012) EVEN MORE EVIDENCE ON PEARL HARBOR

          Even More Evidence on Pearl Harbor - Fraud Claim by the U.S. by Amelia Gora (2012)


            
            Permalink Reply by Amelia Gora on February 17, 2012 at 11:48pm
            Delete
              
            Current media activities...........fyi..........aloha.
            Posted by at

            No comments:

            Post a Comment

            Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)