feeling positive with
Response to a letter I received by Senator Mazie Hirono:
Dear Senator Hirono,
A 'trial on the merits' or a 'merit trial' can be defined as a trial which is based purely on important facts and figures rather than technical practice rules or rules of procedure (these rules may include certain jurisdictional defects or failure to serve properly which would outrightly deny a trial). A judgment thru a 'trial on the merits' is made in merit trials after all the material evidence has been presented in a lawful court.
A trial on the merits or a merit trial can only be appealed after the judgment is issued, not before a trial has been conducted. This means that parties involved can’t appeal during the trial and have to wait until the final judgment. The main reason for this is to prevent unnecessary delays and/or forestalling, which would be inevitable if the parties are allowed to challenge every decision.
With the US Federal government issuing fraudulent edicts against public interest and forestalling daily causing false intimidation, false arrests and/or wrongful incarceration as in the case of medical benefits of marijuana, and where a trial on the merits as related to marijuana have consistently proven the US Federal stance on medical marijuana to be patently false and in favor of 'false' wars, do you support another day of false wars and harming others in furtherance of fraud? Or shall today be your choice to speak on behalf of the truth? Please share with me your preferred opportunity in sharing the truth. Thank you very much Senator Hirono.
Regards,
Haruko and I on a mish! Hair cuts and shopping for Tahiti vacay! Au revoir!
No comments:
Post a Comment