Translate

Friday, February 10, 2017

Track Record of Undoing the Constitution Part 1

Track Record of UNDOING THE CONSTITUTION compiled by Amelia Gora (2012)


WHO’S UNDOING YOUR CONSTITUTION? 

R=view by Amelia Kuulei Gora, one Of Kamehameha’s, Queen Liliuokalan=’s, =rincess =oomaikelani’s, Kahekili of Maui, Kaumualii of Kauai, John Youn=, Isaac Davis, Mataio Kekuanaoa, Nuuanu’s, Akahi’s, John K=pena’s etals. descendant, a Royal person not subject to the laws (=006) 

Have you reviewed your U.S. Constitution recently? 

Ar=icle VI. 

All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before=the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United St=tes under this Constitution, as under the Confederation. 

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United State= which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which=shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supr=me Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, =ny Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwiths=anding. 

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the=Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial =fficers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bou=d by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious T=st shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust=under the United States. 
Notes and Comments: 

Raymond Aki, part=of the Wilcox family, retired Navy Ship Commander, opposed the U.S. courts=in Hawaii and stated to the Judge: “Your honor has no jurisdiction” (in Hawaii). 

Mr. Aki pointed out that Article=6, clause 2 and 3 requires all elected officials to support the Constituti=n. – Conversation at the Bureau of Conveyances – 2005. Read FORMATION OF THE UNITED STATES printed by Congress, Last printing=in 1968. 

Listen to Mr. Cottonmeier in regards to the “Viol=tion of the Constitution becomes second nature” by the Judges who =E2??slowly change law by their decisions’ = “corrupt=on in the courts”. 

Listen to Reverend Farakhan about the B=AST with 7 heads and 10 horns includes puppet GW Bush, etc. 

*** **= *** 

What does it mean when you have a Southern (Confederate State= Republican President named GW Bush who: stated that the U.S. Constitution=was “only a goddam piece of paper”, signs into law the Pat=iot’s act diminishing the rights of Americans, meaning he blatantl= disregards the U.S. Constitution, he continues the torturing of prisoners on Guantanamo, he’s performing self-serving rule over th= wrongful and criminal invasion of Iraq, supports and defends the ongoing =illing of more than 655,000 people, perpetuates fraud by supporting crimin=l Americans in Hawaii, disregards the admissions of wrongs by U.S. Preside=t Clinton in Public Law 103-150 signed in 1993; in continued violation of =reaties, criminal deceit in failing to inform the American public that he =E2??warred for EXXON (oil)”/ contrived reasons to kill for OIL= disregards the fact that he has no jurisdiction outside of 3-12 miles fro= the U.S. continent, operates under the Roman’s rule: “if =ou want peace, prepare for war”, and fellow Southern (Confederate =tate) Republican Newt Gingrich’s belief that “George Washi=gton echoed the same theme as the result of his lifetime struggle for the =ause of freedom. Peace through strength will work. Peace through weakness =s impossible. Frugal yes, foolish no---those should be our watchwords.” 

Failure to inform Am=ricans that George Washington was a Royal person who descended from King G=orge of England; 
Failure to inform Americans of his genealogies, ties =o England as well; General inept qualities in his inability to handle natu=al disasters such as New Orleans Hurricane disaster; Utilizing bully behav=or against other nations; 
Moving to WAR based on the CFR/Council on Fo=eign Relations “Pl under *ing List: The Weapon States include 'IRA= and SYRIA as regions, part of the larger Arab nation for which it reserve= the term.) 'NORTH KOREA ....is a candidate Weapon State: it has about as =uch legitimacy as a nation-state as the German Democratic Republic.' 
<=R>'The danger from the WEAPON State is posed today by IRAQ, tomorrow perha=s by NORTH KOREA or LIBYA....ARGENTINA, PAKISTAN, IRAN, SOUTH AFRICA...' <=R> 
REFERENCE: FOREIGN AFFAIRS - The Road to War America and the World, =age 31,Volume 70, No. 1 

In other words the following on the list to WA= with or TERRORIZE are: 

1. IRAQ (2003 – Iraq accused of ha=ing nuclear weapons – GW Bush moved to WAR for EXXON (oil) see: ar=icle THE BROWN STUFF by Greg Palast, www.gregpalast.com 

2. SYRIA <=R> 
3. ARAB NATION 

4. NORTH KOREA (October 2006 – underg=ound nuclear weapon set off) 

5. GERMAN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC 

7. ARGENTINA 

8. PAKISTAN 

For more, go to.=. 

http://www.kycbs.net/Impeac=-Bush.htm 
Views: 472
Replies are closed for this discussion.
Stop Following – Don't email me when people reply

Replies to This Discussion

Delete
Background:
911Review.org
Wiki
for links that do not work, try...   http://web.archive.org/web/

Disinformation Rule 1

Rules Of Disinformation Number 1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil Regardless of what you know, don't discuss it -- especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it's not reported, it didn't happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.
Example: Media was present in the courtroom (Hunt vs. Liberty Lobby) when CIA agent [WWW] Marita Lorenz 'confession' testimony regarding CIA direct participation in the planning and assassination of John Kennedy was revealed. All media reported was that E. Howard Hunt lost his libel case against Liberty Lobby (Liberty Lobby's newspaper, The Spotlight, had reported Hunt was in Dallas that day and were sued for the story). See Mark Lane's remarkable book, Plausible Denial, for the full confessional transcript.
Proper response: There is no possible response unless you are aware of the material and can make it public yourself.. In any such attempt, be certain to target any known silent party as likely complicit in a cover up. In this case, it would be the entire Time-Warner Media Group, among others. This author is relatively certain that reporters were hand-picked to cover this case from among those having intelligence community ties.


s
*****************************************
911Review.org archived (Wiki)for links that do not work, try... http://web.archive.org/web/

DisinformationRule2
RulesOfDisinformation Number 2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the 'How dare you!' gambit.
Example: 'How dare you suggest that the Branch Davidians were murdered! the FBI and BATF are made up of America's finest and best trained law enforcement, operate under the strictest of legal requirements, and are under the finest leadership the President could want to appoint.'
Proper response: You are avoiding the Waco issue with disinformation tactics. Your high opinion of FBI is not founded in fact. All you need do is examine Ruby Ridge and any number of other examples, and you will see a pattern of abuse of power that demands attention to charges against FBI/BATF at Waco. Why do you refuse to address the issues with disinformation tactics (rule 2 - become incredulous and indignant)?

http://www.911review.org: Home Page
Search.

911Review.org archived Wikifor links that do not work, try... http://web.archive.org/web/

DisinformationRule3
RulesOfDisinformation Number 3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method which works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such 'arguable rumors'. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a 'wild rumor' from a 'bunch of kids on the Internet' which can have no basis in fact.
Example: 'You can't prove his material was legitimately from French Intelligence. Pierre Salinger had a chance to show his 'proof' that flight 800 was brought down by friendly fire, and he didn't. All he really had was the same old baseless rumor that's been floating around the Internet for months.'
Proper response: You are avoiding the issue with disinformation tactics. The Internet charge reported widely is based on a single FBI interview statement to media and a similar statement by a Congressman, neither of which had actually seen Pierre's document. As the FBI is being accused in participating in a cover up of this matter and Pierre claims his material is not Internet sourced, it is natural that FBI would have reason to paint his material in a negative light. For you to assume the FBI to have no bias in the face of Salinger's credentials and unchanged stance suggests you are biased. At the best you can say the matter is in question. Further, to imply that material found on Internet is worthless is not founded. At best you may say it must be considered carefully before accepting it, which will require addressing the actual issues. Why do you refuse to address these issues with disinformation tactics (rule 3 - create rumor mongers)?

http://www.911review.org: Home Page
Search.

Delete

11Review.org Homepage


Rules Of Disinformation Number 4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.
Example: When trying to defeat reports by the Times of London that spy-sat images reveal an object racing towards and striking flight 800, a straw man is used. The disinformationalist, later identified as having worked for Naval Intelligence, simply stated: 'If these images exist, the public has not seen them. Why? They don't exist, and never did. You have no evidence and thus, your entire case falls flat.'
Proper response: 'You are avoiding the issue with disinformation tactics. You imply deceit and deliberately establish an impossible and unwarranted test. It is perfectly natural that the public has not seen them, nor will they for some considerable time, if ever. To produce them would violate national security with respect to intelligence gathering capabilities and limitations, and you should know this. Why do you refuse to address the issues with such disinformation tactics (rule 4 - use a straw man)?'

911Review.org archived Wikifor links that do not work, try... http://web.archive.org/web/

DisinformationRule5
RulesOfDisinformation Number 5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger' ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as 'kooks', 'right-wing', 'liberal', 'left-wing', 'terrorists', 'conspiracy buffs', 'radicals', 'militia', 'racists', 'religious fanatics', 'sexual deviates', and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.
Example: 'You believe what you read in the Spotlight? The Publisher, Willis DeCarto, is a well-known right-wing racist. I guess we know your politics -- does your Bible have a swastika on it? That certainly explains why you support this wild-eyed, right-wing conspiracy theory.'
Proper response: 'You are avoiding the issue with disinformation tactics. Your imply guilt by association and attack truth on the basis of the messenger. The Spotlight is well known Populist media source responsible for releasing facts and stories well before mainstream media will discuss the issues through their veil of silence. Willis DeCarto has successfully handled lawsuits regarding slanderous statements such as yours. Your undemonstrated charges against the messenger have nothing to do with the facts or the issues, and fly in the face of reason. Why do you refuse to address the issues by use of such disinformation tactics (rule 5 - sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule)?'


911Review.org



Rules Of Disinformation Number 6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism reasoning -- simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent's viewpoint.
Example: 'This stuff is garbage. Where do you conspiracy lunatics come up with this crap? I hope you all get run over by black helicopters.' Notice it even has a farewell sound to it, so it won't seem curious if the author is never heard from again.
Proper response: 'You are avoiding the issue with disinformation tactics. Your comments or opinions fail to offer any meaningful dialog or information, and are worthless except to pander to emotionalism, and in fact, reveal you to be emotionally insecure with these matters. If you do not like reading 'this crap', why do you frequent this NG which is clearly for the purpose of such discussion? Why do you refuse to address the issues by use of such disinformation tactics (rule 6 - hit and run)?'

911Review.org archived Wikifor links that do not work, try... http://web.archive.org/web/
DisinformationRule7
RulesOfDisinformation Number 7. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could be taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.
Example: 'With the talk-show circuit and the book deal, it looks like you can make a pretty good living spreading lies.'
Proper response: 'You are avoiding the issue with disinformation tactics. Your imply guilt as a means of attacking the messenger or his credentials, but cowardly fail to offer any concrete evidence that this is so. If you think what has been presented are 'lies', why not simply so illustrate? Why do you refuse to address the issues by use of such disinformation tactics (rule 6 - question motives)?'



911Review.org archived Wikifor links that do not work, try... http://web.archive.org/web/
DisinformationRule8
RulesOfDisinformation Number 8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough 'jargon' and 'minutia' to illustrate you are 'one who knows', and simply say it isn't so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.
Example: 'You obviously know nothing about either the politics or strategic considerations, much less the technicals of the SR-71. Incidentally, for those who might care, that sleek plane is started with a pair of souped up big-block V-8's (originally, Buick 454 C.I.D. with dual 450 CFM Holly Carbs and a full-race Isky cams -- for 850 combined BHP @ 6,500 RPM) using a dragster-style clutch with direct-drive shaft. Anyway, I can tell you with confidence that no Blackbird has ever been flown by Korean nationals nor have they ever been trained to fly it, and have certainly never overflown the Republic of China in a SR or even launched a drone from it that flew over China. I'm not authorized to discuss if there have been overflights by American pilots.'
Proper response: 'You are avoiding the issue with disinformation tactics. Your imply your own authority and expertise but fail to provide credentials, and you also fail to address issues and cite sources. You simply cite 'Jane's-like' information to make us think you know what you are talking about. Why do you refuse to address the issues by use of such disinformation tactics (rule 8 - invoke authority)?'
911Review.org archived Wikifor links that do not work, try... http://web.archive.org/web/
DisinformationRule9
RulesOfDisinformation Number 9. Play Dumb
No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues except with denials they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.
Example: 'Nothing you say makes any sense. Your logic is idiotic. Your facts nonexistent. Better go back to the drawing board and try again.'
Proper response: 'You are avoiding the issue with disinformation tactics. You evade the issues with your own form of nonsense while others, perhaps more intelligent than you pretend to be, have no trouble with the material. Why do you refuse to address the issues by use of such disinformation tactics (rule 9 - play dumb)?'

http://www.911review.org: Home Page
Search.
911Review.org archived Wikifor links that do not work, try... http://web.archive.org/web/
DisinformationRule10
RulesOfDisinformation Number 10. Associate opponent charges with old news A derivative of the straw man -- usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with - a kind of investment for the future should the matter not be so easily contained.) Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually then be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues -- so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source.
Example: 'Flight 553's crash was pilot error, according to the NTSB findings. Digging up new witnesses who say the CIA brought it down at a selected spot and were waiting for it with 50 agents won't revive that old dead horse buried by NTSB more than twenty years ago.'
Proper response: 'You are avoiding the issue with disinformation tactics. Your ignore the issues and imply they are old charges as if new information is irrelevant to truth. Why do you refuse to address the issues by use of such disinformation tactics (rule 10 - associate charges with old news)?'
911Review.org archived Wikifor links that do not work, try... http://web.archive.org/web/
DisinformationRule11
RulesOfDisinformation Number 11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the 'high road' and 'confess' with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made -- but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, 'just isn't so.' Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later, and even publicly 'call for an end to the nonsense' because you have already 'done the right thing.' Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for 'coming clean' and 'owning up' to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues.
Example: 'Reno admitted in hindsight she should have taken more time to question the data provided by subordinates on the deadliness of CS-4 and the likely Davidian response to its use, but she was so concerned about the children that she elected, in what she now believes was a sad and terrible mistake, to order the tear gas be used.'
Proper response: 'You are avoiding the issue with disinformation tactics. Your evade the true issue by focusing on a side issue in an attempt to evoke sympathy. Perhaps you did not know that CIA Public Relations expert Mark Richards was called in to help Janet Reno with the Waco aftermath response? How warm and fuzzy it makes us feel, so much so that we are to ignore more important matters being discussed. Why do you refuse to address the issues by use of such disinformation tactics (rule 11 - establish and rely upon fall-back positions)?'

Disinformation Rule 12

Rules Of Disinformation Number 12. Enigmas have no solution Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to loose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues.
Example: 'I don't see how you can claim Vince Foster was murdered since you can't prove a motive. Before you could do that, you would have to completely solve the whole controversy over everything that went on in the White House and in Arkansas, and even then, you would have to know a heck of a lot more about what went on within the NSA, the Travel Office, and the secret Grand Jury, and on, and on, and on. It's hopeless. Give it up.'
Proper response: 'You are avoiding the issue with disinformation tactics. Your completely evade issues and attempt others from daring to attempt it by making it a much bigger mountain than necessary. You eat an elephant one bite at a time. Why do you refuse to address the issues by use of such disinformation tactics (rule 12 - enigmas have no solution)?'

911Review.org 
911Review Wiki
for links that do not work, try... http://web.archive.org/web/

Disinformation Rule 13

Rules Of Disinformation Number 13. Alice in Wonderland Logic Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards or with an apparent deductive logic which forbears any actual material fact.
Example: 'The news media operates in a fiercely competitive market where stories are gold. This means they dig, dig, dig for the story -- often doing a better job than law enforcement. If there was any evidence that BATF had prior knowledge of the Oklahoma City bombing, they would surely have uncovered it and reported it. They haven't reported it, so there can't have been any prior knowledge. Put up or shut up.'
Proper response: 'You are avoiding the issue with disinformation tactics. Your backwards logic does not work here. Has media reported CIA killed Kennedy when they knew it? No, despite their presence at a [WWW] courtroom testimony 'confession' by CIA operative Marita Lornez in a liable trial between E. Howard Hunt and Liberty Lobby, they only told us the trial verdict. THAT, would have been the biggest story of the Century, but they didn't print it, did they? Why do you refuse to address the issues by use of such disinformation tactics (rule 13 - Alice in Wonderland logic)?'

911Review.org archived Wikifor links that do not work, try... http://web.archive.org/web/
DisinformationRule14
RulesOfDisinformation Number 14. Demand complete solutions Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best with issues qualifying for rule 10.
Example: 'Since you know so much, if James Earl Ray is as innocent as you claim, who really killed Martin Luther King, how was it planned and executed, how did they frame Ray and fool the FBI, and why?'
Proper response: You are avoiding the issue with disinformation tactics. It is not necessary to completely resolve any full matter in order to examine any relative attached issue. Discussion of any evidence of Ray's innocence can stand alone to serve truth, and any alternative solution to the crime, while it may bolster that truth, can also stand alone. Why do you refuse to address the issues by use of such disinformation tactics (rule 14 - demand complete solutions)?

911Review.org archived Wikifor links that do not work, try... http://web.archive.org/web/
DisinformationRule15
RulesOfDisinformation Number 15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place.
Example: 'The cargo door failed on Flight 800 and caused a catastrophic breakup which ruptured the fuel tank and caused it to explode.'
Proper response: The best definitive example of avoiding issues by this technique is, perhaps, Arlan Specter's Magic Bullet from the . This was eloquently defeated in court but media blindly accepted it without challenge. Thus rewarded, disinformationalists do not shrink from its application, even though today, thanks in part to the movie, JFK, most Americans do now understand it was fabricated nonsense. Thus the defense which works best may actually be to cite the Magic Bullet. 'You are avoiding the issue with disinformation tactics. Your imaginative twisting of facts rivals that of Arlan Specter's Magic Bullet in the Warren Report. We all know why the impossible magic bullet was invented. You invent a cargo door problem when there has been not one shred of evidence from the crash investigation to support it, and in fact, actual photos of the cargo door hinges and locks disprove you. Why do you refuse to address the issues by use of such disinformation tactics (rule 15 - fit facts to an alternate conclusion)?'
911Review.org archived Wikifor links that do not work, try... http://web.archive.org/web/

DisinformationRule16
RulesOfDisinformation Number 16. Vanish evidence and witnesses. If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won't have to address the issue.
Example: 'You can't say Paisley is still alive... that his death was faked and the list of CIA agents found on his boat deliberately placed there to support a purge at CIA. You have no proof. Why can't you accept the Police reports?' This is a good ploy, since the dental records and autopsy report showing his body was two inches too long and the teeth weren't his were lost right after his wife demanded inquiry, and since his body was cremated before she could view it -- all that remains are the Police Reports. Handy.
Proper response: There is no suitable response to actual vanished materials or persons, unless you can shed light on the matter, particularly if you can tie the event to a cover up other criminality. However, with respect to dialog where it is used against the discussion, you can respond... 'You are avoiding the issue with disinformation tactics. The best you can say is that the matter is in contention ONLY because of highly suspicious matters such as the simultaneous and mysterious vanishing of three sets of evidence. The suspicious nature itself tends to support the primary allegation. Why do you refuse to address the remaining issues by use of such disinformation tactics (rule 16 - vanish evidence and witnesses)?'


Delete


OOPS !  OOPS 911review.org gearge bush pic image satire
bad request.

You got it wrong !

Thats OK, so did George...

Bush got it wrong too pledge of allegience hand heart wrong


Looking for something ?
search September 11 related material.
9/11 sites, reference, videos, photos etc...


search helpuse the "QUOTES" to narrow your search.
instead of searching the words JOHN DOE
try searching for "JOHN DOE"
This will search for a phrase rather than searching for both words seperately


9-11 search engine

9-11 Review Faq, About Us, Donate

Also visit the Wiki index

and
September 11 Wiki

Articles by Alex Constantine
CIA NSA and government corruption


Articles By Alex Constantine

Exposing corruption.

NSA CIA Government and corporate corruption fraud waste spending
and ties to terror organizations.

Search Google without sending personel info to them

Search Articles by Alex Constantine

proxy private google search CIA spy privacy NSA spies data computer hacking information scroogle scraper

ADNAN KHASHOGGI

A Meta-Group Managing Drugs, Violence, and the State
Phonenix Program's Rep. Simmons: "The CIA Doesn't Torture!"

Michael Jackson Fellowship Foundation cult - CIA
Hopsicker's Own Key Sources on Mena Describe Him as a "Liar"

Dan Goldin, NASA's Creature from the Black Vault, Part One

Dan Goldin, NASA's Creature from the Black Vault, Part Two Orwell i...

Operation Lightning Strike at NASA Human Experimentation + Torture

PROJECT ANTHRAX (6 part series)

The Philippine Version of 9/11 - CIA Agent Crippled by His Own Bomb

Selections from SAIC's SEC Filings, 2000-2002

SAIC's Trinity Church TV/"Dad" Obit./Barry Glasser/Freedom Forum

Bijlmermeer air disaster - Israel - Sarin Gas + depleted uranium

SPOOKS AT MT. HOLYOKE

Questions on plane crashes JFK + Spooks at Holyok

Holyoke's "Understanding Government Project"

More Spooks at Mt. Holyoke

TV Fakery - Randy Hill, ICT, DARPA, AI, 9/11 videos etc.

Mockingbirds Cannistraro and McGovern - CIA - iran contra

Mind Control at MIT

Child-Torturing, Mind Control Cultist was Amabassador to Italy
Murder Case with Telltale Evidence of Mind Control 9/11 Predictions
Operation Lightning Strike at NASA Human Experimentation + Torture

FBI caught lying to reporters about Foley child sex predator scandal
Even the F.B.I. Lied to Cover Up Republicans' "Pervertgate"

Astronaut Brady Suicide

The Schmitz Family A Key Nazi Connection to 9/11

DynCorp a Partner of Porton International

Inland Northwest Space Alliance/U.S.-Asia Network, Iraq Qualcomm Co...

Stolen personal data computer theft - VA social security breach

Is There a COINTEL Smear Campaign Bent on Discrediting Jim Hoffman?

The 'Jewish Badge' PSYOPS Plot Thickens

How Thomas Kean Covered Up His OWN Crimes

The Bluegrass Conspiracy Patsy

Bluegrass Nazis: Tetra Tech, CIA, Reinhard Gehlen Network, etc.


Americans Should Watch What They Eat, Watch What They Chew! FDA



Open directory index for...
Alex Constantine



http://911review.org/

Search 911review

Delete

Forum: the Independent Argument Forum
Subject: The USA has gone mad
From: (HWNWAHINE)
To: (TURTLEDOVE5)
DateTime: 15/12/2003 01:19:20

hi turtledove5,

nice Peace-ful name......notice the kind of squirrels "government types" are beginning to make these kinds of remarks .... just responded to happeh at http://forums.delphiforums.com/id-argument/messages?msg=21517.162

.....who has a similar manner....

the following message will help many in observing "disinformers":

***It is the disinfo artist and those who may pull their strings (those who stand to suffer should the crime be solved) MUST seek to prevent rational and complete examination of any chain of evidence which would hang them. Since fact and truth seldom fall on their own, they must be overcome with lies and deceit. Those who are professional in the art of lies and deceit, such as the intelligence community and the professional criminal (often the same people or at least working together), tend to apply fairly well defined and observable tools in this process. However, the public at large is not well armed against such weapons, and is often easily led astray by these time-proven tactics. Remarkably, not even media and law enforcement have NOT BEEN TRAINED to deal with these issues. For the most part, only the players themselves understand the rules of the game.

This is why concepts from the film, Wag-The-Dog, actually work. If you saw that movie, know that there is at least one real-world counterpart to Al Pacino's character. For CIA, it is Mark Richards, who was called in to orchestrate the media response to Waco on behalf of Janet Reno. Mark Richards is the acknowledged High Priest of Disinformation. His appointment was extremely appropriate, since the CIA was VERY present at Waco from the very beginning of the cult to the very end of their days - just as it was at the People's Temple in Jonestown. Richards purpose in life is damage control.

For such disinformationalists, the overall aim is to avoid discussing links in the chain of evidence which cannot be broken by truth, but at all times, to use clever deceptions or lies to make select links seem weaker than they are, create the illusion of a break, or better still, cause any who are considering the chain to be distracted in any number of ways, including the method of questioning the credentials of the presenter. Please understand that fact is fact, regardless of the source. Likewise, truth is truth, regardless of the source. This is why criminals are allowed to testify against other criminals. Where a motive to lie may truly exist, only actual evidence that the testimony itself IS a lie renders it completely invalid. Were a known 'liar's' testimony to stand on its own without supporting fact, it might certainly be of questionable value, but if the testimony (argument) is based on verifiable or otherwise demonstrable facts, it matters not who does the presenting or what their motives are,
or

Moreover, particularly with respects to public forums such as newspaper letters to the editor, and Internet chat and news groups, the disinfo type has a very important role. In these forums, the principle topics of discussion are generally attempts by individuals to cause other persons to become interested in their own particular position, idea, or solution -- very much in development at the time. People often use such mediums as a sounding board and in hopes of pollination to better form their ideas. Where such ideas are critical of government or powerful, vested groups (especially if their criminality is the topic), the disinfo artist has yet another role -- the role of nipping it in the bud. They also seek to stage the concept, the presenter, and any supporters as less than credible should any possible future confrontation in more public forums result due to their early successes. You can often spot the disinfo types at work here by the unique application of 'higher standards' of discussion than neces
sar

So, as you read any such discussions, particularly so in Internet news groups (NG), decide for yourself when a rational argument is being applied and when disinformation, psyops (psychological warfare operations) or trickery is the tool. Accuse those guilty of the later freely. They (both those deliberately seeking to lead you astray, and those who are simply foolish or misguided thinkers) generally run for cover when thus illuminated, or -- put in other terms, they put up or shut up (a perfectly acceptable outcome either way, since truth is the goal.)
-*Here are the twenty-five methods and seven traits, some of which don't apply directly to NG application. Each contains a simple example in the form of actual (some paraphrased for simplicity) from NG comments on commonly known historical events, and a proper response. Accusations should not be overused -- reserve for repeat offenders and those who use multiple tactics. Responses should avoid falling into emotional traps or informational sidetracks, unless it is feared that some observers will be easily dissuaded by the trickery. Consider quoting the complete rule rather than simply citing it, as others will not have reference. Offer to provide a complete copy of the rule set upon request (see permissions statement at end):
------------------------------------------------------------
-* A must read site. Great and intersting information there:-http://www.911review.org/Wiki/DisinformationRule0.shtml


******
aloha.

**************************************
Kaohi -

this is an aged post but still applies............

aloha nui.

p.s. have to start documenting genocide activists within the claimed aboriginal Hawaiian people such as Walker, etc. many projects going on......and we remain a friendly, neutral, non-violent nation.......notice how Obama et. als. try to say that violence is in the back.........they wish............wicked...beyond wicked, beyond evil............absolutely DIABOLICAL!

let's post on FB every now and then too........malama and malama pono ;p
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/DisinformationRule0.shtml

DisinformationRule0

It is the disinfo artist and those who may pull their strings (those who stand to suffer should the crime be solved) MUST seek to prevent rational and complete examination of any chain of evidence which would hang them. Since fact and truth seldom fall on their own, they must be overcome with lies and deceit. Those who are professional in the art of lies and deceit, such as the intelligence community and the professional criminal (often the same people or at least working together), tend to apply fairly well defined and observable tools in this process. However, the public at large is not well armed against such weapons, and is often easily led astray by these time-proven tactics. Remarkably, not even media and law enforcement have NOT BEEN TRAINED to deal with these issues. For the most part, only the players themselves understand the rules of the game.

This why concepts from the film, Wag-The-Dog, actually work. If you saw that movie, know that there is at least one real-world counterpart to Al Pacino's character. For CIA, it is Mark Richards, who was called in to orchestrate the media response to Waco on behalf of Janet Reno. Mark Richards is the acknowledged High Priest of Disinformation. His appointment was extremely appropriate, since the CIA was VERY present at Waco from the very beginning of the cult to the very end of their days - just as it was at the People's Temple in Jonestown. Richards purpose in life is damage control.

For such disinformationalists, the overall aim is to avoid discussing links in the chain of evidence which cannot be broken by truth, but at all times, to use clever deceptions or lies to make select links seem weaker than they are, create the illusion of a break, or better still, cause any who are considering the chain to be distracted in any number of ways, including the method of questioning the credentials of the presenter. Please understand that fact is fact, regardless of the source. Likewise, truth is truth, regardless of the source. This is why criminals are allowed to testify against other criminals. Where a motive to lie may truly exist, only actual evidence that the testimony itself IS a lie renders it completely invalid. Were a known 'liar's' testimony to stand on its own without supporting fact, it might certainly be of questionable value, but if the testimony (argument) is based on verifiable or otherwise demonstrable facts, it matters not who does the presenting or what their motives are, or if they have lied in the past or even if motivated to lie in this instance -- the facts or links would and should stand or fall on their own merit and their part in the matter will merely be supportive.

Moreover, particularly with respects to public forums such as newspaper letters to the editor, and Internet chat and news groups, the disinfo type has a very important role. In these forums, the principle topics of discussion are generally attempts by individuals to cause other persons to become interested in their own particular position, idea, or solution -- very much in development at the time. People often use such mediums as a sounding board and in hopes of pollination to better form their ideas. Where such ideas are critical of government or powerful, vested groups (especially if their criminality is the topic), the disinfo artist has yet another role -- the role of nipping it in the bud. They also seek to stage the concept, the presenter, and any supporters as less than credible should any possible future confrontation in more public forums result due to their early successes. You can often spot the disinfo types at work here by the unique application of "higher standards" of discussion than necessarily warranted. They will demand that those presenting arguments or concepts back everything up with the same level of expertise as a professor, researcher, or investigative writer. Anything less renders any discussion meaningless and unworthy in their opinion, and anyone who disagrees is obviously stupid -- and they generally put it in exactly those terms.

So, as you read any such discussions, particularly so in Internet news groups (NG), decide for yourself when a rational argument is being applied and when disinformation, psyops (psychological warfare operations) or trickery is the tool. Accuse those guilty of the later freely. They (both those deliberately seeking to lead you astray, and those who are simply foolish or misguided thinkers) generally run for cover when thus illuminated, or -- put in other terms, they put up or shut up (a perfectly acceptable outcome either way, since truth is the goal.) Here are the twenty-five methods and seven traits, some of which don't apply directly to NG application. Each contains a simple example in the form of actual (some paraphrased for simplicity) from NG comments on commonly known historical events, and a proper response. Accusations should not be overused -- reserve for repeat offenders and those who use multiple tactics. Responses should avoid falling into emotional traps or informational sidetracks, unless it is feared that some observers will be easily dissuaded by the trickery. Consider quoting the complete rule rather than simply citing it, as others will not have reference. Offer to provide a complete copy of the rule set upon request (see permissions statement at end):

Next: DisinformationRule1.

http://www.911review.org: Home Page
Search.
Brads batcave

Team 8 +
Physics911.org - Weblog
*******************
Delete

Obama Signs NDAA, ACLU Disgusted

President Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act into law despite 'serious reservations'. The Young Turks host Cenk Uygur breaks it ...
by TheYoungTurks  2 weeks ago  81,094 views

Obama Signs NDAA Martial Law in America 2012

Why This Is Important + Rate Comment + Subscribe ! [& Read Below ] President Barack Obama signed the controversial National Defense Authorization ...
by xBLACKxOPSxSECRETSx  1 month ago  50,311 views

Obama Signs Martial Law Bill

This is also in the bill to: www.dvorak.org ACLU: www.aclu.org Obama's NDAA Signing Statement: I have the power to detain Americans... but I won't ...
by HairNailsBeautytips  3 weeks ago  2,609 views

New Bill Passed [NDAA] The government can now KILL US citizens at w...

The NDAA is a bill that declares the United States as a battlefield, allowing military and government to negate our constitution and KILL US ...
by NuEraMusikBeats  3 weeks ago  744 views

Obama Signs NDAA!!!

My views on Obama signing the NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act.) Obama signs defense bill but balks at terrorism provisions www.latimes.com
by DEMCAD  2 weeks ago  14,143 views

Farrakhan on Obama's signing of NDAA (National Defense Authorizatio...

(FinalCall.com) - Minister Farrakhan comments on President Obama's signing of the the NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act) during Jan. 9 ...
by FCNN  1 week ago  21,797 views

Obama Signs NDAA Bill

01/01/2012 US President Barack Obama has put pen to paper on a $662 billion defense bill despite serious reservations from critics over the ...
by LeakSourceArchive  3 weeks ago  4,923 views

Obama to Sign NDAA Bill: Today is The Day America Truly Dies! 1/3

Alex also covers the latest news, including the passage yesterday in the House of the draconian National Defense Authorization Act that will allow ...
by TheAlexJonesChannel  1 month ago  30,487 views

NDAA: Obama Legalizing Tyranny - More Americans to be Killed Withou...

Alex covers Obama's signing of the National Defense Authorization Act, a draconian bill that will allow the military to arrest American citizens ...
by TheAlexJonesChannel  2 weeks ago  19,183 views

NDAA Indefinite Detention Bill Passed by Obama

Yesterday the US Congress voted to pass the National Defense Authorization Actfor Fiscal Year 2012. The 86 to 13 vote will allow the indefinite ...
by ExplosiveNews  1 month ago  18,371 views

Preview of Today's Show: Obama's NDAA Signing Statement, Collapse o...

On this first live show of 2012, Alex takes a large number of your calls and talks about the latest news, including the Iowa caucus tomorrow and ...
by TheAlexJonesChannel  2 weeks ago  16,295 views

NDAA: Obama Legalizing Tyranny - More Americans to be Killed Withou...

Alex covers Obama's signing of the National Defense Authorization Act, a draconian bill that will allow the military to arrest American citizens ...
by TheAlexJonesChannel  2 weeks ago  11,674 views

NDAA & Obama: Defenders Are Wrong - Here's Why

President Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act, a decision being defended by some partisan Democrats. The Young Turks host Cenk ...
by TheYoungTurks  2 weeks ago  46,946 views

Obama Signs NDAA Martial Law ∞ Justifying why U have no Rights ? Ro...

by coffeefication video from 2009 NDAA was planned along time ago ! Petition Arrest Rogue US Senators that support National Defense Authorization ...
by Rohbss2  2 weeks ago  11,078 views

Anonymous Message: Real Revolution is Here. The former US Governmen...

, you should've expected us. ... Occupy SD 99 ... "Anon Message" "Anonymous Message" NDAA "President Obama signs NDAA" opblackout "Occupy Wall Street" ...
by OccupySD99  2 weeks ago  15,634 views

Obama Supporters ACLU Slam Him For Signing NDAA Bill www.RightFace.us

www.RightFace.us Obama Supporters ACLU Slam Him For Signing NDAA Bill. National Defense Authorization Act signed by President ObamaNDAA
by rightface1  2 weeks ago  190 views
Delete
by drinkingwithbob  2 weeks ago  33,027 views

Obama Signs NDAA Bill : What is the NDAA Bill

NDAA Bill Nation Defense Authorization Act : Indefinite Detention of Americans without a charge or trial. - - - - - Ndda Arresting americans new ...
by ExplosiveNews  1 month ago  22,409 views

IM NOT A SMART DUDE, BUT PRESIDENT OBAMA SIGNING THE #NDAA IS NOT C...

www.naturalnews.com National Defense Authorization Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediThe National Defense Authorization Act is a United States ...
by TheNikbagtvZone  2 weeks ago  1,289 views

Proof Obama Will Sign NDAA 1031 Citizen Indefinite Detention Law in...

UPDATE 12/14/11 (5:18 PM) - White House issues statement saying it will not veto defense bill, www.washingtonpost.com Broadcast on C-SPAN
by Cincinnati911Truth  1 month ago  36,269 views

Search Results

  1. For 7 years DC has been slowly undoing the Constitution/Bill Of ...

     
    1 post - 1 author - Dec 1, 2011
    For 7 years DC has been slowly undoing the Constitution/Bill Of Rights to fight "terra:", blkmusclmachine, Dec-01-11 03:06 PM, #32 ...
  2. Independent voters make me nervous … by Guido. | Save America ...

     
    Jan 4, 2012 – Yet we elected Obama despite his predilection to undo the Constitution and Bill of Rights. No American who understands the reasons for the ...
  3. Why is the Bill of Rights Important? - Importance of the Bill of Rights ...

     
    civilliberty.about.com/od/historyprofiles/f/important.htm
    The importance of the Bill of Rights isn't as obvious as it might first appear. ... and rejected the idea of including a Bill of Rights in the original 1787 Constitution... so went the theory, then they could choose new representatives to undo the bad ...
  4. 'Repeal It' Group Vows to Undo Health Reform If It Becomes Law

     
    Mar 18, 2010 – South Dakota Governor Signs Tough Abortion Bill Into Law · - Politics Daily Staff ... Rarely have politicians signed up to undo a law before it takes effect, or has even passed. But dozens of .... 2011 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.
  5. Print-friendly format - Texas Politics - The Constitution

     
    texaspolitics.laits.utexas.edu/7_printable.html
    Unsurprisingly, the 1875 Convention sought to undo much of the work of its .... In contrast to the U.S. Constitution which included its Bill of Rights only as an ...
  6. United States Bill of Rights - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

     
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Bill_of_Rights
    The Bill of Rights was not included in the Constitution submitted to the states for ..... to pre-empt a second Constitutional Convention that might have undone the ...
  7. Undo the NDAA! Restore the Constitution! « #OccupyVermont

     
    occupyvermont.wordpress.com/.../undo-the-ndaa-restore-the-constitu...
    Jan 9, 2012 – The US Constitution and Bill of Rights are the birthright of every American. The liberties granted in ... 1 thought on “Undo the NDAA! Restore the ...
  8. Daybreak, Undoing the Imperial Presidency and Forming a More ...

     
    Undoing the Imperial Presidency and Forming a More Perfect Union ... the way American government works and deteriorated the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
  9. undo legal definition of undoundo synonyms by the Free Online ...

     
    legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/undo
    Definition of undo in the Legal Dictionary - by Free online English dictionary and encyclopedia. ... Meaning of undo as a legal term. What does undo mean in law?
  10. Amazon.com: James Madison and the Struggle for the Bill of Rights ...

     
     24 reviews - $28.00 - In stock
    Amazon.com: James Madison and the Struggle for the Bill of Rights (Pivotal ... for one as a pretext to call a second constitutional convention to undo the first.
Delete
The Truth by Farrakhan.................
*****************************************************************
TREASON!
War Criminals BUSH & BLAIR for Iraq War.............What does it mean when OBAMA perpetuated their actions?  Is that not the Iraq War, Iran War and the other nations listed above?
1. IRAQ (2003 – Iraq accused of ha=ing nuclear weapons – GW Bush moved to WAR for EXXON (oil) see: ar=icle THE BROWN STUFF by Greg Palast, www.gregpalast.com 

2. SYRIA <=R> 
3. ARAB NATION 

4. NORTH KOREA (October 2006 – underg=ound nuclear weapon set off) 

5. GERMAN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC 

7. ARGENTINA 

8. PAKISTAN 

For more, go to.=.
This came out of the article "ROAD TO WAR" by the CFR/Council on Foreign Relations....made up of the U.S., England, and the Morgan Bankers (which includes the Bank of England)..........
Together they created the United Nations moving towards One World Order/New World Order.
How did they get their financing?  From the Hawaiian Islands..........
Now, using the disinformation put out the media.............know that the FEMA branch was created to support One World Order/New World Order...
See the following:

FEMA - The Secret Government

By Harry V. Martin with research assistance from David Caul

Copyright FreeAmerica and Harry V. Martin, 1995

Some people have referred to it as the "secret government" of the United States. It is not an elected body, it does not involve itself in public disclosures, and it even has a quasi-secret budget in the billions of dollars. This government organization has more power than the President of the United States or the Congress, it has the power to suspend laws, move entire populations, arrest and detain citizens without a warrant and hold them without trial, it can seize property, food supplies, transportation systems, and can suspend the Constitution.

Not only is it the most powerful entity in the United States, but it was not even created under Constitutional law by the Congress. It was a product of a Presidential Executive Order. No, it is not the U.S. military nor the Central Intelligence Agency, they are subject to Congress. The organization is called FEMA, which stands for the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Originally conceived in the Richard Nixon Administration, it was refined by President Jimmy Carter and given teeth in the Ronald Reagan and George Bush Administrations.
FEMA had one original concept when it was created, to assure the survivability of the United States government in the event of a nuclear attack on this nation. It was also provided with the task of being a federal coordinating body during times of domestic disasters, such as earthquakes, floods and hurricanes. Its awesome powers grow under the tutelage of people like Lt. Col. Oliver North and General Richard Secord, the architects on the Iran-Contra scandal and the looting of America's savings and loan institutions. FEMA has even been given control of the State Defense Forces, a rag-tag, often considered neo-Nazi, civilian army that will substitute for the National Guard, if the Guard is called to duty overseas.
THE MOST POWERFUL ORGANIZATION IN THE UNITED STATES
Though it may be the most powerful organization in the United States, few people know it even exists. But it has crept into our private lives. Even mortgage papers contain FEMA's name in small print if the property in question is near a flood plain. FEMA was deeply involved in the Los Angeles riots and the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake in the San Francisco Bay Area. Some of the black helicopter traffic reported throughout the United States, but mainly in the West, California, Washington, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas and Colorado, are flown by FEMA personnel. FEMA has been given responsibility for many new disasters including urban forest fires, home heating emergencies, refugee situations, urban riots, and emergency planning for nuclear and toxic incidents. In the West, it works in conjunction with the Sixth Army.
FEMA was created in a series of Executive Orders. A Presidential Executive Order, whether Constitutional or not, becomes law simply by its publication in the Federal Registry. Congress is by-passed. Executive Order Number 12148 created the Federal Emergency Management Agency that is to interface with the Department of Defense for civil defense planning and funding. An "emergency czar" was appointed. FEMA has only spent about 6 percent of its budget on national emergencies, the bulk of their funding has been used for the construction of secret underground facilities to assure continuity of government in case of a major emergency, foreign or domestic. Executive Order Number 12656 appointed the National Security Council as the principal body that should consider emergency powers. This allows the government to increase domestic intelligence and surveillance of U.S. citizens and would restrict the freedom of movement within the United States and grant the government the right to isolate large groups of civilians. The National Guard could be federalized to seal all borders and take control of U.S. air space and all ports of entry.
Here are just a few Executive Orders associated with FEMA that would suspend the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. These Executive Orders have been on record for nearly 30 years and could be enacted by the stroke of a Presidential pen:
  • EXECUTIVE ORDER 10990 allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports.
  • EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 allows the government to seize and control the communication media.
  • EXECUTIVE ORDER 10997 allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals.
  • EXECUTIVE ORDER 10998 allows the government to take over all food resources and farms.
  • EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000 allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.
  • EXECUTIVE ORDER 11001 allows the government to take over all health, education and welfare functions.
  • EXECUTIVE ORDER 11002 designates the Postmaster General to operate a national registration of all persons.
  • EXECUTIVE ORDER 11003 allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.
  • EXECUTIVE ORDER 11004 allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for populations.
  • EXECUTIVE ORDER 11005 allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities.
  • EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.
  • EXECUTIVE ORDER 11310 grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.
  • EXECUTIVE ORDER 11049 assigns emergency preparedness function to federal departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative Executive Orders issued over a fifteen year period.
  • EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921 allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money in U.S. financial institution in any undefined national emergency. It also provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress cannot review the action for six months.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency has broad powers in every aspect of the nation. General Frank Salzedo, chief of FEMA's Civil Security Division stated in a 1983 conference that he saw FEMA's role as a "new frontier in the protection of individual and governmental leaders from assassination, and of civil and military installations from sabotage and/or attack, as well as prevention of dissident groups from gaining access to U.S. opinion, or a global audience in times of crisis."

FEMA's powers were consolidated by President Carter to incorporate:
  • the National Security Act of 1947, which allows for the strategic relocation of industries, services, government and other essential economic activities, and to rationalize the requirements for manpower, resources and production facilities;
  • the 1950 Defense Production Act, which gives the President sweeping powers over all aspects of the economy;
  • the Act of August 29, 1916, which authorizes the Secretary of the Army, in time of war, to take possession of any transportation system for transporting troops, material, or any other purpose related to the emergency; and
  • the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which enables the President to seize the property of a foreign country or national.

These powers were transferred to FEMA in a sweeping consolidation in 1979.

HURRICANE ANDREW FOCUSED ATTENTION ON FEMA
FEMA's deceptive role really did not come to light with much of the public until Hurricane Andrew smashed into the U.S. mainland. As Russell R. Dynes, director of the Disaster Research Center of the University of Delaware, wrote in The World and I, "...The eye of the political storm hovered over the Federal Emergency Management Agency. FEMA became a convenient target for criticism." Because FEMA was accused of dropping the ball in Florida, the media and Congress commenced to study this agency. What came out of the critical look was that FEMA was spending 12 times more for "black operations" than for disaster relief. It spent $1.3 billion building secret bunkers throughout the United States in anticipation of government disruption by foreign or domestic upheaval. Yet fewer than 20 members of Congress , only members with top security clearance, know of the $1.3 billion expenditure by FEMA for non-natural disaster situations. These few Congressional leaders state that FEMA has a "black curtain" around its operations. FEMA has worked on National Security programs since 1979, and its predecessor, the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency, has secretly spent millions of dollars before being merged into FEMA by President Carter in 1979.
FEMA has developed 300 sophisticated mobile units that are capable of sustaining themselves for a month. The vehicles are located in five areas of the United States. They have tremendous communication systems and each contains a generator that would provide power to 120 homes each, but have never been used for disaster relief.
FEMA's enormous powers can be triggered easily. In any form of domestic or foreign problem, perceived and not always actual, emergency powers can be enacted. The President of the United States now has broader powers to declare martial law, which activates FEMA's extraordinary powers. Martial law can be declared during time of increased tension overseas, economic problems within the United States, such as a depression, civil unrest, such as demonstrations or scenes like the Los Angeles riots, and in a drug crisis. These Presidential powers have increased with successive Crime Bills, particularly the 1991 and 1993 Crime Bills, which increase the power to suspend the rights guaranteed under the Constitution and to seize property of those suspected of being drug dealers, to individuals who participate in a public protest or demonstration. Under emergency plans already in existence, the power exists to suspend the Constitution and turn over the reigns of government to FEMA and appointing military commanders to run state and local governments. FEMA then would have the right to order the detention of anyone whom there is reasonable ground to believe...will engage in, or probably conspire with others to engage in acts of espionage or sabotage. The plan also authorized the establishment of concentration camps for detaining the accused, but no trial.
Three times since 1984, FEMA stood on the threshold of taking control of the nation. Once under President Reagan in 1984, and twice under President Bush in 1990 and 1992. But under those three scenarios, there was not a sufficient crisis to warrant risking martial law. Most experts on the subject of FEMA and Martial Law insisted that a crisis has to appear dangerous enough for the people of the United States before they would tolerate or accept complete government takeover. The typical crisis needed would be threat of imminent nuclear war, rioting in several U.S. cites simultaneously, a series of national disasters that affect widespread danger to the populous, massive terrorist attacks, a depression in which tens of millions are unemployed and without financial resources, or a major environmental disaster.
THREE TIMES FEMA STOOD BY READY FOR EMERGENCY
In April 1984, President Reagan signed Presidential Director Number 54 that allowed FEMA to engage in a secret national "readiness exercise" under the code name of REX 84. The exercise was to test FEMA's readiness to assume military authority in the event of a "State of Domestic National Emergency" concurrent with the launching of a direct United States military operation in Central America. The plan called for the deputation of U.S. military and National Guard units so that they could legally be used for domestic law enforcement. These units would be assigned to conduct sweeps and take into custody an estimated 400,000 undocumented Central American immigrants in the United States. The immigrants would be interned at 10 detention centers to be set up at military bases throughout the country.
REX 84 was so highly guarded that special metal security doors were placed on the fifth floor of the FEMA building in Washington, D.C. Even long-standing employees of the Civil Defense of the Federal Executive Department possessing the highest possible security clearances were not being allowed through the newly installed metal security doors. Only personnel wearing a special red Christian cross or crucifix lapel pin were allowed into the premises. Lt. Col. North was responsible for drawing up the emergency plan, which U.S. Attorney General William French Smith opposed vehemently. The plan called for the suspension of the Constitution, turning control of the government over to FEMA, appointment of military commanders to run state and local governments and the declaration of Martial Law. The Presidential Executive Orders to support such a plan were already in place. The plan also advocated the rounding up and transfer to "assembly centers or relocation camps" of a least 21 million American Negroes in the event of massive rioting or disorder, not unlike the rounding up of the Jews in Nazi Germany in the 1930s.
The second known time that FEMA stood by was in 1990 when Desert Storm was enacted. Prior to President Bush's invasion of Iraq, FEMA began to draft new legislation to increase its already formidable powers. One of the elements incorporated into the plan was to set up operations within any state or locality without the prior permission of local or state authorities. Such prior permission has always been required in the past. Much of the mechanism being set into place was in anticipation of the economic collapse of the Western World. The war with Iraq may have been conceived as a ploy to boost the bankrupt economy, but it only pushed the West into deeper recession.
The third scenario for FEMA came with the Los Angeles riots after the Rodney King brutality verdict. Had the rioting spread to other cities, FEMA would have been empowered to step in. As it was, major rioting only occurred in the Los Angeles area, thus preventing a pretext for a FEMA response.
On July 5, 1987, the Miami Herald published reports on FEMA's new goals. The goal was to suspend the Constitution in the event of a national crisis, such as nuclear war, violent and widespread internal dissent, or national opposition to a U.S. military invasion abroad. Lt. Col. North was the architect. National Security Directive Number 52 issued in August 1982, pertains to the "Use of National Guard Troops to Quell Disturbances."
The crux of the problem is that FEMA has the power to turn the United States into a police state in time of a real crisis or a manufactured crisis. Lt. Col. North virtually established the apparatus for dictatorship. Only the criticism of the Attorney General prevented the plans from being adopted. But intelligence reports indicate that FEMA has a folder with 22 Executive Orders for the President to sign in case of an emergency. It is believed those Executive Orders contain the framework of North's concepts, delayed by criticism but never truly abandoned.
The crisis, as the government now see it, is civil unrest. For generations, the government was concerned with nuclear war, but the violent and disruptive demonstrations that surrounded the Vietnam War era prompted President Nixon to change the direction of emergency powers from war time to times of domestic unrest. Diana Raynolds, program director of the Edward R. Murrow Center, summed up the dangers of FEMA today and the public reaction to Martial Law in a drug crisis: "It was James Madison's worst nightmare that a righteous faction would someday be strong enough to sweep away the Constitutional restraints designed by the framers to prevent the tyranny of centralized power, excessive privilege, an arbitrary governmental authority over the individual. These restraints, the balancing and checking of powers among branches and layers of government, and the civil guarantees, would be the first casualties in a drug-induced national security state with Reagan's Civil Emergency Preparedness unleashed. Nevertheless, there would be those who would welcome NSC (National Security Council) into the drug fray, believing that increasing state police powers to emergency levels is the only way left to fight American's enemy within. In the short run, a national security state would probably be a relief to those whose personal security and quality of life has been diminished by drugs or drug related crime. And, as the general public watches the progression of institutional chaos and social decay, they too may be willing to pay the ultimate price, one drug free America for 200 years of democracy."
The first targets in any FEMA emergency would be Hispanics and Blacks, the FEMA orders call for them to be rounded up and detained. Tax protesters, demonstrators against government military intervention outside U.S. borders, and people who maintain weapons in their homes are also targets. Operation Trojan Horse is a program designed to learn the identity of potential opponents to martial law. The program lures potential protesters into public forums, conducted by a "hero" of the people who advocates survival training. The list of names gathered at such meetings and rallies are computerized and then targeted in case of an emergency.
The most shining example of America to the world has been its peaceful transition of government from one administration to another. Despite crises of great magnitude, the United States has maintained its freedom and liberty. This nation now stands on the threshold of rule by non-elected people asserting non-Constitutional powers. Even Congress cannot review a Martial Law action until six months after it has been declared. For the first time in American history, the reigns of government would not be transferred from one elected element to another, but the Constitution, itself, can be suspended.
The scenarios established to trigger FEMA into action are generally found in the society today, economic collapse, civil unrest, drug problems, terrorist attacks, and protests against American intervention in a foreign country. All these premises exist, it could only be a matter of time in which one of these triggers the entire emergency necessary to bring FEMA into action, and then it may be too late, because under the FEMA plan, there is no contingency by which Constitutional power is restored.
 
*********************************************************
TREASON, TREASON, TREASON...............................
IMPEACH, IMPEACH, IMPEACH.............................
Your true President is JOE BIDEN...............
The People needs to take back their government.............
Read the legal issues........listen to the youtube.com  videos......
The Democratic system was only meant to be temporary, the intent was to maneuver towards Communism, supporting England and the Bank of England.......
see the 1822 Secret Treaty of Verona......
  1. Treaty of Verona - Secret Articles

     
    Senator Owen: I wish to put in the Record the secret treaty of Verona of November 22, 1822, showing what this ancient conflict is between the rule of the few and ...
  2. 1916 - Congress Record - Sen. Owen Treaty of Verona - YouTube

     
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=_UBXHSFr4bwJan 16, 2009 - 5 min - Uploaded by ForgottenHistoryUSA
    written in 1919 by Senator Owen, where he again warns of the Secret Treaty of Verona. Senator Robert L ...
  3. Secret Treaty Of Verona!

     
    members.foothills.net/ricefile/Jesuit%20secret%20instructions1.htm
    "Secret Instructions. of the. Society of Jesus". or the. JESUIT PRIESTS. Originally circulated in Manuscript until 1612. when it was published in Cracow, Poland.
  4. The Suppressed Truth about the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln ...

     
    The death of President Lincoln was the culmination of but one step in the attempt to carry out the Secret Treaty of Verona, of October, 1822, a pact entered into ...
  5. The Compleat Patriot: THE SECRET TREATY OF VERONA

     
    compleatpatriot.blogspot.com/2009/09/secret-treaty-of-verona.html
    Sep 30, 2009 – It is called the treatise of VERONA, I wish to put into the record of my blogs this secret treaty of Verona of November 22, 1822, Which was put ...
*********************************************

Delete
Read all the laws that OBAMA signed:
  1. Barack Obama Executive Orders Subjects

     
    30+ items – Barack Obama Executive Orders Subjects.
    Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, President's Advisory Commission on ...
    Automotive Communities and Workers, White House Council on; establishment ...
  2. 2011 Executive Orders Signed by Barack Obama

     
    Federal Register Disposition 2011 Executive Orders Signed by President Barack Obama.
  3. Obama uses executive actions instead of law – USATODAY.com

     
    www.usatoday.com/news/washington/.../obama-executive-orders/.../1
    Oct 26, 2011 – On recent initiatives, President Obama used his executive authority rather than seeking legislation.
  4. ABC News
    Las Vegas Review - Journal‎ - 2 days ago
    Obama issued an executive order seeking to boost tourist visa processing in China and Brazil, and to speed application handling for visitors generally. ...
    824 related articles
  5. Executive Orders | The White House

     
    President Barack Obama ... President Obama greets White House visitors ... Executive Order -- Establishing Visa and Foreign Visitor Processing Goals and the ...
  6. We Can't Wait: President Obama Takes Actions to Increase Travel ...

     
    3 days ago – This morning, President Obama will sign an Executive Order and announce new initiatives to significantly increase travel and tourism in the ...
  7. Obama's Executive Order 13575 Rural Council – Agenda 21 (video)

     
    Nov 29, 2011 – To: Nachum. Administration of Barack Obama, 2011. Executive Order 13575—Establishment of the White House Rural Council June 9, 2011 ...
  8. President Obama sidesteps Republican roadblocks with executive ...

     
    Oct 29, 2011 – While on a three-day Western trip this week, Obama issued executive orders to help students repay their loans, to keep struggling homeowners ...
  9. Obama's Student-Loan Order Saves the Average Grad Less Than ...

     
    www.theatlantic.com/business/.../10/obamas...order.../247411/
    Oct 26, 2011 – President Obama seeks to respond to this question with an executive order in the next part of his "We Can't Wait" unilateral stimulus effort.
  10. Current List of President Obama's Executive Orders - 1461 Days - Yes

     
    1461days.blogspot.com/2009/.../current-list-of-president-obamas.ht...
    Jan 24, 2009 – Help by sharing Obama's Executive Order list with your friends on FaceBook! Each item below has a link to the Executive Order or a PDF of the ...
  11. Obama Executive Order Will Cut Government Spending, Waste

     
    www.huffingtonpost.com/.../obama-executive-order-government-wa...
    Nov 9, 2011 – WASHINGTON — With the stroke of his pen, President Barack Obama has sacked souvenirs federal agencies buy with taxpayer money to ...
Delete
*********************
The Problematic Issues in American History are as follows:
1.  George Washington was not the first President....there were three (3+) others before him.
2.  The Rush Baggot Treaty is a permanent treaty with England ----England believes that the U.S. never really became separate as documented when Prince Philip and his long time fling married and prior to his visit to the U.S., he was announced on TV as visiting the U.S., the "colony of the Crown"....
3.  The Executive Order was utilized by George Washington and was continued as a "tradition" and not legal..............
4.  George Washington descended from the King of England, Charles........Royal persons are not subject to the laws.....and therefore he failed to inform the American people whose side he was really on, etc.
5.  As with all the other Presidents, they have a direct connect to the Royal Families of England, even OBAMA........
6.  The Federal Reserve was purchased by stockholders who run the banking systems today.............and it was due to President Cleveland's actions.  Cleveland's relatives in New York were bankers and in dire straits because the U.S. was bankrupt in 1893 and many of the banks, businesses were broken.
7.  The 1822 Secret Treaty of Verona is identified in the 1918 Congressional Records which occurred after Queen Liliuokalani died.
The intent of the Treaty was to extinguish Monarchy/Monarchical governments worldwide and create a One World Order/New World Order.
The intent was to maintain slavery everywhere......assume assets, lands, resources belonging to "PEOPLE OF COLOR"
8.  Progressives changes in the Constitution, Bill of Rights has been made over time.....TREASON documented.........the People, the Voters, American Citizens are the key......take back your government.......charge TREASON, IMPEACH, etc.

Review all the above and you will understand.......
  1. Monarchy- Queen Liliuokalani vs. Treasonous Persons, U.S. ...

     
    maoliworld.ning.com/.../monarchy-queen-liliuokalani-vs-treasonous-...
    Sep 23, 2011 – Treasonous Persons, U.S., Warmongers, Their Investors, One World Order Links to Hawaii researched by Amelia Gora (2011) Wa…
  2. Remembering Queen Liliuokalani on 11-11-11 Who Died on 11-11 1917 ...

     
    maoliworld.ning.com/.../remembering-queen-liliuokalani-on-11-11-...
    Nov 11, 2011 – Treasonous Persons, U.S., Warmongers, Their Investors, One World Order Links to Hawaii researched and amended by Amelia Gora (2011) ...
  3. One World Order = The Monroe Doctrine extended and pushed by ...

     
    maoliworld.ning.com/forum/topics/one-world-order-the-monroe
    May 30, 2011 – One World Order = The Monroe Doctrine extended and pushed by the CFR made up of the U.S., England, and Bankers. Posted by Amelia Gora ...
  4. IOLANI - The Royal Hawk

     
    5 days ago – Compiled by Amelia Gora (2012) ..... This Treaty also became a move towards One World Order, New World Order. PIRATE OF THE PACIFIC: ...
  5. OpEdNews - Diaries Content

     
    ... Communism/One World Order/New World Order goals set up since his birth. ... Amelia Gora: NOSTRODAMUS Prophecy or Conspiracy(ies) (Part 2 of 3) cont. ...
  6. OpEdNews - Diary: The Royal Families In The Hawaiian Islands and ...

     
    5 days ago – By Amelia Gora (about the author) ..... an arm of the One World Order/New World Order with moves to assume what is not theirs; eliminate the ...
  7. Hawaiian Kingdom Facts | Just another WordPress.com site

     
    ameliagora.wordpress.com/
    Oct 15, 2011 – Reply by Amelia Gora on July 5, 2010 at 8:18am ... move towards One World Order – comprised of Nations that All Nations should watch out for ...
  8. Amelia Gora-Kanaka Maoli/Aboriginal Hawaiian Truth: In Defense of ...

     
    amelia-gora.blogspot.com/.../in-defense-of-kanaka-maolihawaiian.ht...
    Nov 14, 2011 – Posted by Amelia Gora on May 31, 2011 at 2:05am in Politics ... governments worldwide and to start a New World OrderOne World Order was ...
  9. Uncategorized « IOLANI – The Royal Hawk

     
    iolani.wordpress.com/category/uncategorized/page/4/
    by KN Pua - Related articles
    Amelia Gora Permalink Reply by Amelia Gora 1 second ago ..... Presidents, Kings of England, and movers of the New World Order/One World Order.
  10. Lynette Cruz omg... | Facebook

     
    ... Genocide Activists/One World Order/New World Order supporters Akaka and Inouye ... Amelia Gora many folk are unaware of all of this...thank you Pono and ...
Delete
More References:
Tuesday, January 17:

Amelia Gora: *The Royal Families In The Hawaiian Islands and the Problematic Maso... Remembering the Criminal dethronement of Queen Liliuokalani by Americans in 1893 with the help of U.S. President Benjamin Harrison, U.S. Congress, England, and the Morgan bankers, et. als. "Wrongful Dethronement of Queen Liliuokalani Anniversary Special: THE ROYAL FAMILIES...and the Problematic Masons/Freemasons"
Sunday, January 8:
Cumhur Ozkaya: "Being daughter of Cannes winner Yilmaz Guney ruined me' Director Yilmaz Guney who made different and extraordinary movies in Turkey at history is still discussed with movies, articles, letters and family.
Saturday, October 22:
Amelia Gora: *Apec Is Dangerous To All In The Hawaiian Islands............. APEC members are dangerous to all in the Hawaiian Islands, in the World... aloha.
Sunday, October 16:
Mahdi Ibn-ziyad: Response to Note on Black Participation in Occupier Movement A Response to Note on Black Participation in Occupier Movement
Tuesday, October 11:
. .: winning the human race The Finnish Lion- universal jurisdiction 1 
Saturday, August 20:
Amelia Gora: EVIDENCE: WHY THE ENTITY STATE OF HAWAII IS NOT THE HAWAIIAN GOVERN...More Evidence/information.........aloha.
Friday, August 19:

Amelia Gora: *EVIDENCE: WHY THE ENTITY STATE OF HAWAII IS NOT THE HAWAIIAN GOVERN... A Monarchy form of government with a Pirate entity supported by the U.S. does not make it the Hawaiian government with rights to assume, criminally assume a neutral, non-violent, friendly nation recognized in the Law of Nations........
Tuesday, August 2:
Amelia Gora: Pirates Around Us in the Hawaiian Islands and our Sister Nations Taking a Real Look at our Hawaiian History takes on a different perspective towards the U.S., England, and the bankers.
Wednesday, July 20:
Amelia Gora: *Exposing BORIS ABRAMOV also known as BARACK OBAMA Exposing OBAMA article shows that he was not born in the Hawaiian Islands, his Social Security Number has surfaced, and news about his KGB activities add to his moves towards Communism/One World Order/New World Order goals set up since his birth. 1 
Wednesday, July 6:
Amelia Gora: PIRATES IN THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS - MORE EVIDENCE.... More Evidence of Piracy(ies), Racketeering has been found; additionally, the Governor has been served an Eviction Notice....aloha.
Saturday, July 2:
Amelia Gora: Remembering July 4 th etc.: "Americans Addicted to A--Holes" --- Ge... Truth About George Washington, including his heir Barack OBAMA...... from the Hawaiian Islands/Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii and updates. 1 
Monday, June 27:
Amelia Gora: The Hawaiian Islands ARE NOT Part of the United States....Here's WH... The Hawaiian Islands/Hawaiian archipelago/Ko Hawaii Pae Aina/Hawaiian Kingdom/Kingdom of Hawaii/Hawaiian government - The TRUE government exists...Piracy(ies) on the high seas, Premeditation by U.S. President, Congress and military assisted treasonous persons to criminally assume the Hawaiian Islands... 2 
Wednesday, June 1:
Amelia Gora: NOSTRODAMUS Prophecy or Conspiracy(ies) (Part 2 of 3)cont. from Part 1 of 3.

Amelia Gora: NOSTRODAMUS Prophecy or Conspiracy(ies) (Part 1 of 2) Part 1 - NOSTRODAMUS Prophecy appears to be part of a Conspiracy since World War I.
Saturday, May 14:
Cumhur Ozkaya: September 11, Director Martinelli and OttomansDo you (Americans) have any idea about relations between Vienna blockade of Ottoman and September 11? 3 
Amelia Gora: WARS AGAINST THE WORLD..................Since the Criminal Assumpti...WARS AGAINST THE WORLD..................Since the Criminal Assumption of a Neutral, Non-Violent, Friendly Nation, the Hawaiian Kingdom/Ko Hawaii Pae Aina and Background for all to see.........aloha.
Wednesday, April 13:
Cumhur Ozkaya: On Commune (Paris-1871) film As Paris Commune has a short time as Commune (Paris 1871) film has a long time.
Monday, November 22:
Lolwme: JESSE VENTURA'S JFK ASSASSINATION First hand account of day JFK was assassinated.
Friday, October 22:
Amelia Gora: *PARASITES IN PARADISE A Neutral Nation Hawaii/Hawaiian Kingdom was returned to Queen Liliuokalani by U.S. President Cleveland in 1895-96. Queen Liliuokalani was not able to obtain dispatches due to American conspirators/Pirates/Parasites supported by the U.S., England, and the Morgan bankers. A neutral nations monies, etc. are used for WARS which is not o.k. E ala E/Wake Up everyone. It's not OK to use a neutral nations monies,etc. STOP WARS NOW!
Sunday, January 31:
Mystic Wizard: Howard Zinn Intervewed by Bill Moyers About His Last Documentary,"T...Howard Zinn's discussion with Bill Moyers on Howard's documentary, based on his book A "Voices of People's History of the United States".
Sunday, December 13:
Sleeper: *We need accountability not escalationThe criminal acts that occured on 9/11/2001 led us to Afghanistan. They require credible investigations not escalation that scapegoats one participating organization.



TOP LIFE NEWS:
economy <=> ecology
by robert wolff
Pauline Searle's DAWN OVER OMAN
by Kevin Anthony Stoda
The Golden Age of Late-20th Century Photography
by GLloyd Rowsey
Why Fracking And Other Disasters Are So Hard to Stop
by Peter Montague
close your eyes & let me frack you
by e b bortz
Aquarius New Moon, Mars Retrograde and Chinese New Year 2012
by Cathy Lynn Pagano
Berkeley -- Red Baron link?
by Bob Patterson
To Error and Back Again, or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love...
by Ian Hansen
To Error and Back Again, or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love...
by Ian Hansen
To Error and Back Again, or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love...
by Ian Hansen
Bioidentical Hormones Prevent Osteoarthritis by Jeffrey Dach MD
by Jeffrey Dach
first arrest
by e b bortz
World Children's Choir Rocks MLK Birthday Celebration in Washington DC
by Jerry Nelson
President Obama Needs to Mourn (Review essay)
by Thomas Farrell
Breaking News: Monsanto To Face Biopiracy Charges In India
by Sayer Ji
Is Democracy D. O. A.?
by Bob Patterson
Our Psyche's Battle to Tame the Ego and End Class Warfare
by Peter Michaelson
Twelve 2012 Myths
by Paul Von Ward
earth note 166
by e b bortz
America becoming the sacrifice zone for world population overload
by Frosty Wooldridge
Time to say: "No way, San Jose!"?
by Bob Patterson
The Overlooked Factor in Criminal Behavior
by Peter Michaelson
Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZMwKPmsbWE  WHO MUCKED UP THE WORLD? hmmm.................  Jesus will be coming soon..............aloha.
Delete
1991 article by John Nelson:
 
Delete
repeated words of John Nelson:
I could go on but the story is long! I hope this information and research is of assistance to you. Much remains to be uncovered and disclosed, as it is necessary and imperative to secure the Lives, Liberties, Property, Peace and Dignity of the People and our Posterity. Good Hunting and the Good Lord be with you in all your endeavors.
God Bless John Nelson, Jure Soli Jure Sanguinis, Jure Coronea
P.S. In addition, I am yet expecting a copy of the “Service Agreement”[T.D.O. 91]. It was located in the Department of Treasury, office of the Assistant General Council (International Affairs), Russell L. Munk, 1500 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20220. Efforts are being made to obtain a copy, but so far have been obstructed by the Bar. If anyone knows where and how a copy can be obtained please do so immediately, the documents are necessary and imperative. It ought to be most informative! By the way, it’s against the law for an insolvent to make a loan or to try to fraudulently collect thereon [See: Neal et a. vs. Clark, 251 P.2d.903]. It should be further noted that an “Alien” or “Denizen” cannot sit on a Jury [See: 3 Am. Jur.2d Sec.40], nor hold a Public Office [See also: 50 U.S.C.A. 781(9) & 842].
The “out of court” summery determinations upon matters in issue is purely , “Administrative” procedure [see: 1 Am. Jur. 2d Sec. 78]. The jury, if any, is reduced to an “advisory jury” position, and is more than likely arrayed as a “homage” jury (Note: What Mr. Nelson means is that since all juries impaneled in American come from the “Registered Voter” list of United States citizens, and are Aliens to the State wherein they re sitting, they are not a Jury as defined in the Constitution, but are merely an advisory panel for the so-called judge, actually an Administrative Magistrate under the Executive branch of the federal government. As more and more of these hidden facts become clear to you, what is wrong in American becomes painfully clear).
5 U.S.C.A. 701-701 should be of interest concerning “Judicial Review” of Agency actions. It can be found in most States under such headings and Acts as the “Administrative Procedures Act” or the “Administrative Reorganization Act.”
All de facto Federal/International chartered “Institutions”, their Officers, Employees, Servants, Agents and Representative re subject to and should be turned over to a Court of Law for prosecution, trial and judgment according to law [See: Pope Mfg. Co. vs. Gormully, 144 U.S. 414, at pg. 419; see also, 22 U.S.C.A. 286g].
“FRAUD vitiates the most solemn Contracts, documents and even judgments” (U.S. vs. Throckmorton, 98 US61, at pg. 65).
I believe that the statement made in Cohen vs. Virginia, 6 Wheat 264, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821) is worthy of note:
“We (Courts) have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which is not given. THE ONE OR THE OTHER WOULD BE TREASON TO THE CONSTITUTION” (Also see: U.S. vs. Will, 449 US 200 66 L.Ed. 3d 392, at pg. 406).
"WHEN IN THE COURSE OF HUMAN EVENTS…WHENEVER ANY FORM OF GOVERNMENT BECOMES DESTRUCTIVE…WHEN A LONG TRAIN OF ABUSES AND USURPATIONS’S, PURSUING INVARIABLE THE SAME OBJECT, EVINCES A DESIGN TO REDUCE THEM UNDER ABSOLUTE DESPOTISM, IT IS THEIR RIGHT, IT IS THEIR DUTY…” [Declaration of Independence]
“No political truth is of greater intrinsic value….The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary in the same hands, whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may be justly pronounced the very definition of tyranny”[Federalist Papers No. 47]. (Author’s note: This refers to the Separation of Powers which forms the basis for freedom in our Republican form of government.)
“IF a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be. The functions of every government have propensities to command at will the liberties and property of ther constituents. There is no safe deposit for these but with the people themselves; nor can they be safe with them without information” [The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Albert E. Bergh Ed., vol. 14, pg. 384].
One cannot make agreements with Sodomites, Babylonians and/or Satanics. Their words, oaths or signatures are of no meaning or value; their intent and purpose is to deceive, cheat, steal, lie, defraud and destroy. The seditious overt conspiracy and collusion of certain Organizations, Corporations and Associations to damage, injure, oppress, threaten, intimidate and enforce their fraudulent, foreign, socialist, Communist, “Democracy” and foist their delusions upon the Citizens and children of this land, and to corrupt the de jure Public Offices established to accomplish the purposes set forth in the “Preamble” to the ordained and established Constitution is cause and necessity enough.
Once again finding our safety, happiness and liberties to be in imminent danger, it has become necessary and imperative to our rights, privileges, immunities, lives, liberties and property and that of our prosperity, to declare our separate and equal station, and exercise our Right and Duty to throw off and abolish the form and operation of thede facto, fraudulent, seditious “state” [See: Constitution For The State Of Colorado, Article II, Section 2; Declaration of Independence (1776); Constitution For The United States Of America, Amendments IX and X, C.R.S. 24-60-130], Article IV(h)].
Section 2. People may alter or abolish form of government – proviso. The people of this state have the sole and exclusive right of governing themselves, as a free, sovereign and independent state; and to alter or abolish their constitution and form of government whenever they deem it necessary to their safety and happiness, provided, such change be not repugnant to the constitution of the United States.
----IT IS HERBY DEEMED NECESSARY---
JURE CORONEA --- TESTE MEIPSO
Let Us Now Proceed With The Prosecutions
A Call For The Cleansing Of Our Nation Under God
(Note: For those of you who have read this document, if you are a Public Official, a police officer, a member of the Bar, a government employee at any level of government, a member of the armed forces of the United States, or a , forgive the use of the ‘word’, politician, and are involved in any manner in helping to subvert the Constitution of the United States of America as has been described in this work in general, you are, either knowingly or unknowingly, committing treason. To me, either knowingly or unknowingly makes no difference. This was clearly spelled out at the Nuremberg trials at the end of World War II.
Treason is Treason, and there will come a time, in the very near future, where you will be held accountable for your actions by your peers. If you escape that retribution, there will be a Final Judgment from a power far greater than any on the face of this Earth, and far more severe than any I or anyone of this earth could ever hand down onto you.)
“The greater the power, the more dangerous the abuse.” – Edmond Burke
“Man will ultimately be governed by God or by tyrants.” – Benjamin Franklin
“Society in every state is a blessing, but Government in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.” – Thomas Paine
“The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against the tyranny in government.”---Thomas Jefferson
(typed by A. Gora - completed Sat. morn. 3/15/2003...for the sake of our INNOCENTS, our babies, everyone's babies, "we are one in the spirit with our Lord.....")

No comments: