https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8hVOMAmY-s New York is scarey...only liked the lights, and the police on the horses....
I disagreed with Ron Williams and was responding to a question he posed, but he unfriended me before I could post it. My disagreement wasn't personal but I guess he took it that way. So I'll post my response here.
1. Breastfeeding is healthier as a medical fact. It would be ridiculous for anyone to disagree with that. That is what makes me think there is way more to the true story than what was written.
2. Without a link to the source document, i.e., the transcri...pts, we are left to the opinion of a biased media which says US blackmailed Equador. Seems ridiculous to do that over a mere policy statement of the UN, but if true, evidence should prove it. The author should have posted a link. If true, that would be alarming. I agree with Ron on that point.
1. Breastfeeding is healthier as a medical fact. It would be ridiculous for anyone to disagree with that. That is what makes me think there is way more to the true story than what was written.
2. Without a link to the source document, i.e., the transcri...pts, we are left to the opinion of a biased media which says US blackmailed Equador. Seems ridiculous to do that over a mere policy statement of the UN, but if true, evidence should prove it. The author should have posted a link. If true, that would be alarming. I agree with Ron on that point.
3. WHO IS an UN special agency. Minor research will confirm that. I'm sorry he didn't know that.
4. Yes, I did read the article and not just the headline. It doesn't make any sense to me. The article seems riduculous. Common sense requires skepticism in this case. Trump denies it.
5. Russia sponsored it? Good. So what? Russian mother's also breastfeed. No source of contention there.
6. There has to be more than meets the eye...attributing intent without evidence, i.e. US objected because it wanted to preserve corporate profits, is irresponsible. How about... some woman need formula... even those who breast feed, which is manufactured by a company.... common sense... people buy formula which is sold for a profit. Most "for profit" companies try to make a profit. I don't think Trump was protecting one out two companies. I think he wanted mother's to have access to formula... that's all.
7. Without links to transcripts or documents, this piece is written to be "sensationalized"... which the media does all the time. It is an anti-Trump article.
For someone who constantly reminds us all to seek out source evidence, I'm surprised Ron defended an author who provided none, at the expense of unfriending me.
Sorry for the loss of Ron's posts, I enjoyed them. Didn't think contrary opinion would get me unfriended, especially from an educator. Thought it was as encouraged, but I guess I thought wrong. I didn't even have time to give him the reason for my opinion. I was outta there so fast....I feel devalued and dismissed.
See More4. Yes, I did read the article and not just the headline. It doesn't make any sense to me. The article seems riduculous. Common sense requires skepticism in this case. Trump denies it.
5. Russia sponsored it? Good. So what? Russian mother's also breastfeed. No source of contention there.
6. There has to be more than meets the eye...attributing intent without evidence, i.e. US objected because it wanted to preserve corporate profits, is irresponsible. How about... some woman need formula... even those who breast feed, which is manufactured by a company.... common sense... people buy formula which is sold for a profit. Most "for profit" companies try to make a profit. I don't think Trump was protecting one out two companies. I think he wanted mother's to have access to formula... that's all.
7. Without links to transcripts or documents, this piece is written to be "sensationalized"... which the media does all the time. It is an anti-Trump article.
For someone who constantly reminds us all to seek out source evidence, I'm surprised Ron defended an author who provided none, at the expense of unfriending me.
Sorry for the loss of Ron's posts, I enjoyed them. Didn't think contrary opinion would get me unfriended, especially from an educator. Thought it was as encouraged, but I guess I thought wrong. I didn't even have time to give him the reason for my opinion. I was outta there so fast....I feel devalued and dismissed.
No comments:
Post a Comment