Hawaiian Kingdom
or
Exposed: The United States, England, etc. Pirate
Eyes and Goals to Annex
a Neutral, Friendly, Non-Violent Nation
Review by Amelia Gora (2018)
The Hawaiian Kingdom has been wrongfully, criminally assumed by nations whose goals are to plunder, pillage, assume others properties, lands, assets, water, minerals, etc. in a lawless manner.
In reviewing the article below, you'll find that there are deliberate lies documented which makes it appear to be truthful, but it really is an ongoing indoctrination of lies pursued by the planners, usurpers of an honest nation vs. a bankrupt thieving alien population who arrived at our shores to assume, squat, pirate, pillage, a paradise on earth.
The following are some of the characters involved in illegally assuming a foreign nation well outside of legal limits and failing to follow rules of law, the Constitution of the Hawaiian Kingdom:
1820 - Mercenaries/Missionaries arrived with the intent to annex Hawaii to the United States.
1892 - The following U.S. Presidents and U.S. Secretaries of State desired to annex Hawaii to the United States:
U.S. President Tyler
U.S. President Taylor
U S. President Fillmore
U.S. President Pierce
U.S. President Johnson
U.S. President Grant
U.S. President Harrison
Secretaries of State:
Daniel Webster 1850 - 1852 under U.S. President Millard Fillmore
John C. Calhoun 1844 - 1845 under U.S. President John Tyler
James Buchanan 1845 - 1849 under U.S. President John Polk
John M. Clayton 1845 - 1849 under U.S. President John Polk
William L. Marcy 1853 - 1857 U.S. President Franklin Pierce
William H. Seward 1861 - 1865 U.S. President Abraham Lincoln and U.S. President Andrew
Johnson - (not found but documented in the news article)
Hamilton Fish 1869 - 1877 U.S. President Ulysses S. Grant and U.S. President Rutherford Hayes
Frederick Theodore Frelinghuysen 1881 - 1885 U.S. President Chester A. Arthur
James G. Blaine 1881 - 1881 U.S. President James A. Garfield and U.S. President Chester A. Arthur
John W. Foster/General John W. Foster, Secretary of State, 1892 - 1893 U.S. President Benjamin
Harrison
DISCUSSION
The use of lies are heavily applied in this article. This is called indoctrination or disinformation:
The 25 Rules of Disinformation
1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don’t discuss it — especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it’s not reported, it didn’t happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.
2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the “How dare you!” gambit.
3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such “arguable rumors”. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a “wild rumor” which can have no basis in fact.
4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent’s argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.
5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as “kooks”, “right-wing”, “liberal”, “left-wing”, “terrorists”, “conspiracy buffs”, “radicals”, “militia”, “racists”, “religious fanatics”, “sexual deviates”, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.
6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism reasoning — simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent’s viewpoint.
7. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could so taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.
8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough “jargon” and “minutiae” to illustrate you are “one who knows”, and simply say it isn’t so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.
9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues with denial they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.
10. Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with. Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually them be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues — so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source.
11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions. Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the “high road” and “confess” with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made — but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, “just isn’t so.” Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later. Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for “coming clean” and “owning up” to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues.
12. Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to loose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues.
13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards with an apparent deductive logic in a way that forbears any actual material fact.
14. Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best for items qualifying for rule 10.
15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions. This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place.
16. Vanishing evidence and witnesses. If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won’t have to address the issue.
17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can “argue” with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.
18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can’t do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how “sensitive they are to criticism”.
19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the “play dumb” rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon). In order to completely avoid discussing issues may require you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.
20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.
21. Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body. Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed an unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict (usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim) is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed.
22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.
23. Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes.
24. Silence critics. If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of their character by release of blackmail information, or merely by proper intimidation with blackmail or other threats.
25. Vanish. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen.
https://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/the-25-rules-of-disinformation/
Fraud, deceit, racketeering, piracy, pillaging, conspiracies, convoluted information where employed by Foster/General John Foster and many others over time.
The truth, applications of rule of laws, Constitutions are what keeps everything anchored.
Father Damien of Kalaupapa, Molokai, the priest who took care of the lepers said that the usurpers were a 'bunch of belials' and that's putting it in a nice way.
Research incomplete.
aloha.
References
United States Secretary of State John W. Foster "helped direct the overthrow of the Hawaiian Monarchy
United States Secretary of State John W. Foster "helped direct the overthrow of the Hawaiian Monarchy
or
JOHN W. FOSTER: LOADS OF LIES OUT OF WASHINGTON, D.C.
As Secretary of State, Foster "helped direct the overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy."[
Review by Amelia Gora (2018)
The following article shows Loads of Lies, Premeditation Evidence of the United States Secretary of State who did actively play a role in taking over a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation.
Failure to follow the rule of law and the U.S. Constitution is documented.
Appears that U.S. President Abraham Lincoln, U.S. President Grover Cleveland, U.S. President John F. Kennedy, and U.S. President Donald Trump moved to follow the rule of law and the U.S. Constitution.
The other U.S. Presidents did engage in the FAIL to follow rule of law and the U.S. Constitution and subject to charges of treason by the American people, other nations including the Royal Families of the Hawaiian Kingdom.
or
JOHN W. FOSTER: LOADS OF LIES OUT OF WASHINGTON, D.C.
As Secretary of State, Foster "helped direct the overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy."[
Review by Amelia Gora (2018)
The following article shows Loads of Lies, Premeditation Evidence of the United States Secretary of State who did actively play a role in taking over a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation.
Failure to follow the rule of law and the U.S. Constitution is documented.
Appears that U.S. President Abraham Lincoln, U.S. President Grover Cleveland, U.S. President John F. Kennedy, and U.S. President Donald Trump moved to follow the rule of law and the U.S. Constitution.
The other U.S. Presidents did engage in the FAIL to follow rule of law and the U.S. Constitution and subject to charges of treason by the American people, other nations including the Royal Families of the Hawaiian Kingdom.
References:
U.S. Presidents
U.S. Secretaries of State https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Secretaries_of_State_of_the_United_States
************
facebook:
https://iolani-theroyalhawk.blogspot.com/…/more-premeditati… Mercenaries or Missionaries were the beginnings of Greed, animosities against a neutral, friendly, non-violent nation...……..documented...…...
from Wikipedia:
Background of Foster who helped to direct the usurpation of Queen Liliuokalani:
John W. Foster
| John Foster | |
|---|---|
 | |
| 32nd United States Secretary of State | |
| In office June 29, 1892 – February 23, 1893 | |
| President | Benjamin Harrison |
| Preceded by | James G. Blaine |
| Succeeded by | Walter Q. Gresham |
| United States Minister to Spain | |
| In office June 16, 1883 – August 28, 1885 | |
| President | Chester A. Arthur Grover Cleveland |
| Preceded by | Hannibal Hamlin |
| Succeeded by | Jabez Curry |
| United States Minister to Russia | |
| In office June 11, 1880 – August 1, 1881 | |
| President | Rutherford B. Hayes James A. Garfield |
| Preceded by | Edwin W. Stoughton |
| Succeeded by | William H. Hunt |
| United States Minister to Mexico | |
| In office June 16, 1873 – March 2, 1880 | |
| President | Ulysses S. Grant Rutherford B. Hayes |
| Preceded by | Thomas H. Nelson |
| Succeeded by | Philip H. Morgan |
| Personal details | |
| Born | John Watson Foster March 2, 1836 Petersburg, Indiana, U.S. |
| Died | November 15, 1917 (aged 81) Washington, D.C., U.S. |
| Political party | Republican |
| Spouse(s) | Mary Parke McFerson (1859–1917) |
| Children | 2 |
| Education | Indiana University, Bloomington (BA) Harvard University |
| Military service | |
| Allegiance |  United States • Union |
| Service/branch |  United States Army • Union Army |
| Years of service | 1861–1865 |
| Rank |  Colonel |
| Battles/wars | American Civil War |
Contents
Early life[edit]
Foster was born on March 2, 1836, in Petersburg, Indiana, and raised in Evansville, Indiana. He was the son of Matthew Watson, an Indiana farmer, and the former Eleanor Foster (née Johnson). He graduated from the fledgling Indiana University in 1855, but decided not to become a preacher as his parents hoped. Instead, Foster attended Harvard Law School, then moved to Cincinnati, Ohio to begin his legal career.In 1861, Foster volunteered in the Union Army in the American Civil War.[1] Initially commissioned as a major, he rose to the rank of colonel, serving with the 25th Indiana Volunteer Infantry, the 65th Indiana Volunteer Mounted Infantry and the 136th Indiana Volunteer Infantry. Foster's troops became the first to enter Knoxville, Tennessee after the successful campaign by General Ambrose Burnside.
Foster was a member of the Military Order of the Loyal Legion of the United States - a military society of officers who had served in the Union armed forces during the Civil War.
After the war, Foster returned to Indiana and (in addition to his legal practice) edited the Evansville Daily Journal. He used the paper to promote the Republican Party from 1865 to 1869.
Washington career[edit]
Foster moved to Washington, D.C. under Republican President Ulysses S. Grant, as well as had a summer home in Watertown, New York. As a reward for his political service after the Republican Party split in 1872 as a result of scandals and rampant corruption in Grant's first administration (which even reached Vice President Schuyler Colfax and which had caused reformers to nominate Horace Greeley in futile opposition to Grant's second term), successive Republican Presidents Grant, Rutherford B. Hayes and James A. Garfield appointed Foster the U.S. Ambassador to Mexico (1873–1880), then to Russia (1880–1881). President Chester A. Arthur made Foster the United States Ambassador to Spain (1883–1885).In Benjamin Harrison's administration, Foster served as a State Department "trouble shooter" before becoming Secretary of State for the final six months of Harrison's term (from June 29, 1892, to February 23, 1893). As such, Foster replaced James Gillespie Blaine, who had succumbed to Bright's disease, of which he later died. As Secretary of State, Foster "helped direct the overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy."[2]:11
After leaving public office, Foster remained in Washington and invented a new type of legal practice, lobbying for large "corporations seeking favors in Washington and chances to expand abroad."[2]:12 Foster also used his government and political contacts to secure legal fees as counsel to several foreign legations. He also continued to serve Presidents part-time on diplomatic missions. As such, Foster negotiated trade agreements with eight countries, brokered a treaty with Britain and Russia concerning seal hunting in the Bering Sea, and negotiated the Treaty of Shimonoseki of 1895 (technically as legal consultant and commissioner for the Qing Dynasty in which China recognized Korean independence as well as ceded Taiwan to the victorious Japanese after the First Sino-Japanese War.[2]:12[3]
In 1903, Foster published American diplomacy in the Orient, followed in 1904 by Arbitration and the Hague Court. In 1906, he wrote The practice of diplomacy as illustrated in the foreign relations of the United States.[4] These are among the many books written by John Watson Foster.
Family[edit]
Three of Foster's children never reached adulthood. Foster sent his son to Princeton. Foster doted on his daughters' grandchildren, regaling them with tales of life on the frontier as well as in foreign lands (of which he retained many curios). His daughter Edith Foster married Presbyterian minister Allen Macy Dulles, and their children included John Foster Dulles (who also became a U.S. Secretary of State) and Allen Welsh Dulles, (Director of Central Intelligence). Foster's daughter Eleanor married State Department legal advisor Robert Lansing (who later also served as U.S. Secretary of State); their niece Eleanor Lansing Dulles became an economist and diplomat.[1] Foster is also the great-grandfather of the noted Catholic convert and theologian Cardinal Avery Dulles.Death and legacy[edit]
Foster died in Washington, D.C. on November 15, 1917. His body was returned to Evansville, Indiana, where it remains in Oak Hill Cemetery, which is listed on the National Register of Historic Places for Vanderburgh County. | Wikisource has original works written by or about: John W. Foster |
See also[edit]
- Devine, Michael (1981). John W. Foster: Politics and Diplomacy in the Imperial Era, 1837–1917. London: The Ohio University Press. ISBN 0-8214-0437-7.
References[edit]
- ^ Jump up to: a b "Biographies of the Secretaries of State: John Watson Foster". U.S. Department of State, Office of the Historian. Retrieved June 17, 2014.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c Kinzer, Steven (2013). The Brothers: John Foster Dulles, Allen Dulles, and Their Secret World War. Times Books.
- Jump up ^ "John W. Foster". Internet Accuracy Project. Retrieved June 17, 2014.
- Jump up ^ Foster, John Watson (1906). The practice of diplomacy as illustrated in the foreign relations of the United States. Boston, Massachusetts: Houghton, Mifflin and Company.
| Political offices | ||
|---|---|---|
| Preceded by James G. Blaine |
U.S. Secretary of State Served under: Benjamin Harrison 1892–1893 |
Succeeded by Walter Q. Gresham |
No comments:
Post a Comment