Invite all educators and those wondering how Hawaiians went from being among the most literate and educated people in the entire world during the Hawaiian kingdom to the most under- and un-educated ethnic population in Hawaiʻi under US rule - and the lowest readers in the entire US - to review the 1906 Programme for Patriotic Exercises in the Public Schools, which is an example of indoctrination at its finest.
This pamphlet appeared 10 years after Act 57, Sec. 30 of the 1896 Laws of the "Republic of Hawaii" banned the use of Hawaiian Language. This law, stated, “The English Language shall be the medium and basis of instruction in all public and private schools……. Any schools that shall not conform to the provisions of this section shall not be recognized by the Department.”
This pamphlet appeared 10 years after Act 57, Sec. 30 of the 1896 Laws of the "Republic of Hawaii" banned the use of Hawaiian Language. This law, stated, “The English Language shall be the medium and basis of instruction in all public and private schools……. Any schools that shall not conform to the provisions of this section shall not be recognized by the Department.”
#wearemaunakea #wearestillhere #nomeansno #aoletmt #goplanB #protectsacredplaces #protectmaunakea #seeyouonthemauna
The lone Supreme Court Justice opposed to the Thirty Meter Telescope issued his dissent Friday, accusing the court of opening the door to more deterioration of Hawaii’s natural and cultural resources.
Justice Michael Wilson, a former chairman of the state Land Board, took issue with the majority’s finding that because prior telescopes had already substantially impacted the summit, the addition of TMT was not a “substantial and adverse impact” that would have violated conservation law.
Wilson said that essentially means Mauna Kea is no longer protected by the conservation law.
[ State Supreme Court rules in favor of Thirty Meter Telescope’s construction ]
“Under this new principle of natural resource law,” Wilson wrote, “one of the most sacred resources of the Hawaiian culture loses its protection because it has previously undergone substantial adverse impact from prior development of telescopes.”
Wilson argued that the TMT project “eclipses all other telescopes in magnitude” and should not have been granted a permit.
Opponents have asked for more time to seek reconsideration of the Court’s 4-1 decision that upheld the permit, because they were waiting for Wilson to public his dissent.
Legal experts said if the court doesn’t reconsider, telescope opponents have very little hope of overturning the decision.
Justice Michael Wilson, a former chairman of the state Land Board, took issue with the majority’s finding that because prior telescopes had already substantially impacted the summit, the addition of TMT was not a “substantial and adverse impact” that would have violated conservation law.
Wilson said that essentially means Mauna Kea is no longer protected by the conservation law.
[ State Supreme Court rules in favor of Thirty Meter Telescope’s construction ]
“Under this new principle of natural resource law,” Wilson wrote, “one of the most sacred resources of the Hawaiian culture loses its protection because it has previously undergone substantial adverse impact from prior development of telescopes.”
Wilson argued that the TMT project “eclipses all other telescopes in magnitude” and should not have been granted a permit.
Opponents have asked for more time to seek reconsideration of the Court’s 4-1 decision that upheld the permit, because they were waiting for Wilson to public his dissent.
Legal experts said if the court doesn’t reconsider, telescope opponents have very little hope of overturning the decision.
#wearemaunakea #wearestillhere #nomeansno #aoletmt #goplanB #protectsacredplaces #protectmaunakea #seeyouonthemauna
The lone Supreme Court Justice opposed to the Thirty Meter Telescope issued his dissent Friday, accusing the court of opening the door to more deterioration of Hawaii’s natural and cultural resources.
Justice Michael Wilson, a former chairman of the state Land Board, took issue with the majority’s finding that because prior telescopes had already substantially impacted the summit, the addition of TMT was not a “substantial and adverse impact” that would have violated conservation law.
Wilson said that essentially means Mauna Kea is no longer protected by the conservation law.
[ State Supreme Court rules in favor of Thirty Meter Telescope’s construction ]
“Under this new principle of natural resource law,” Wilson wrote, “one of the most sacred resources of the Hawaiian culture loses its protection because it has previously undergone substantial adverse impact from prior development of telescopes.”
Wilson argued that the TMT project “eclipses all other telescopes in magnitude” and should not have been granted a permit.
Opponents have asked for more time to seek reconsideration of the Court’s 4-1 decision that upheld the permit, because they were waiting for Wilson to public his dissent.
Legal experts said if the court doesn’t reconsider, telescope opponents have very little hope of overturning the decision.
Justice Michael Wilson, a former chairman of the state Land Board, took issue with the majority’s finding that because prior telescopes had already substantially impacted the summit, the addition of TMT was not a “substantial and adverse impact” that would have violated conservation law.
Wilson said that essentially means Mauna Kea is no longer protected by the conservation law.
[ State Supreme Court rules in favor of Thirty Meter Telescope’s construction ]
“Under this new principle of natural resource law,” Wilson wrote, “one of the most sacred resources of the Hawaiian culture loses its protection because it has previously undergone substantial adverse impact from prior development of telescopes.”
Wilson argued that the TMT project “eclipses all other telescopes in magnitude” and should not have been granted a permit.
Opponents have asked for more time to seek reconsideration of the Court’s 4-1 decision that upheld the permit, because they were waiting for Wilson to public his dissent.
Legal experts said if the court doesn’t reconsider, telescope opponents have very little hope of overturning the decision.
Fwd: No Treaty of Annexation
| x |
|
Wed, Nov 14, 9:20 AM (2 days ago)
|  | ||
| ||||
Aloha,
Did anyone call out the schools for not teaching history?
Mahalo,
Ruth
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Ruthie Caudill <ruthiejim13@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 1:58 PM
Subject: No Treaty of Annexation
To: claudia_asato-onaga@notes.k12.
From: Ruthie Caudill <ruthiejim13@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 1:58 PM
Subject: No Treaty of Annexation
To: claudia_asato-onaga@notes.k12.
Dear Hawaii Superintendent of Schools,
It has come to my attention that your students are Not being informed that the is NO Treaty of Annexation with the US.
In fact, there is a statue outside of McKinley High School with the Treaty of Annexation in President McKinley’s hand.
This is false.
Again, there is NO Treaty of Annexation between Hawaii and America.
Please change what Hawaii is teaching.
Regards,
Ruthann Caudill
4001 9th St. N. 1501
Arlington, VA 22203
https://www.healingcancernaturally.com/fluoride-cancer-oste… (quoted below)
CANCER AND FLUORIDE
By now we all know how cancer begins with one cell whose inner blueprint - its DNA - has been screwed with. Remember those velcro hydrogen bonds? Guess what other shape they hold together. The double helix - DNA. This turns out to be the exact mechanism of fluoride as a carcinogen. Austrian and Japanese researchers both found that a concentration of 1 PPM fluoride causes disruption of the body's ability to repair its own DNA. Without this most basic cell function, cancer is promoted, and tumor growth is accelerated. (Klein) (Tsutsui)
CANCER AND FLUORIDE
By now we all know how cancer begins with one cell whose inner blueprint - its DNA - has been screwed with. Remember those velcro hydrogen bonds? Guess what other shape they hold together. The double helix - DNA. This turns out to be the exact mechanism of fluoride as a carcinogen. Austrian and Japanese researchers both found that a concentration of 1 PPM fluoride causes disruption of the body's ability to repair its own DNA. Without this most basic cell function, cancer is promoted, and tumor growth is accelerated. (Klein) (Tsutsui)
That's standard fluoride level in U.S. city water: one part per million.
On p. 65 of his book, Dr. Yiamouyiannis provides an amazing chart of some 19 major scientific studies conducted in universities all over the world, together proving beyond a doubt that fluoride causes genetic damage. End of story. Except that on p 68, there is another list of world studies proving the same thing with plants and insects - genetic alteration from fluoride.
Chief chemist of the National Cancer Institute, Dr. Dean Burk when confronted with mountains of data, stated before Congress:
"In point of fact, fluoride causes more human cancer death, and causes it faster than any other chemical."
Congressional Record 21 July 1976
Congressional Record 21 July 1976
Aurora Light: Prepare for the Landings! Galactic Council intervene to stop nuclear conflagration!
•
38 Comments
VIEW
VIEW
VIEW
VIEW
VIEW
VIEW
VIEW
VIEW
VIEW
VIEW
VIEW
VIEW
VIEW
VIEW
VIEW
VIEW
VIEW
VIEW
VIEW
VIEW
VIEW
VIEW
VIEW
VIEW
VIEW
VIEW
VIEW
VIEW
VIEW
No comments:
Post a Comment